| Literature DB >> 31731646 |
Yanping Shi1, Chao Sun1, Xiaoqi Gao1, Wei Zhao2, Nan Zhou1.
Abstract
In this paper, we designed a new quantitative and qualitive detectionEntities:
Keywords: Ag+ complex; IFE; RLS technique; biothiols; carbon quantum dots
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31731646 PMCID: PMC6891520 DOI: 10.3390/molecules24224136
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Molecules ISSN: 1420-3049 Impact factor: 4.411
Figure 1(a) The TEM images of C/N-dots; (b) UV-vis absorption (black line) and excitation (blue line) and emission (red line) spectra of the aqueous dispersion of the C/N-dots.
Figure 2(a) The full-scale XPS spectrum of C/N-dots. High-resolution C1s (b) N1s (c) XPS spectra of C/N-dots. (d) FTIR spectrum of C/N-dots.
Figure 3(a) Response of FL intensity in C/N-dots aqueous with the addition of different metal ions; (b) Effects of metal ions on the FL intensity of C/N-dots; (c) Response of RLS intensity with the addition of different metals ions; (d) Effects of metal ions on the RLS intensity of C/N-dots. F and F0 correspond to the FL intensities of the C/N-dots–Ag+ complex system with and without metal ions (33.3 μM), respectively.
Figure 4(a) The RLS intensity of the C/N-dots–Ag+ complex system with the addition of Cys and GSH; the insets corresponded to FL changes; (b) The corresponding UV-Vis absorption spectra of the above solution.
Figure 5(a) The effect of pH (6.0 (a), 7.0 (b), 8.0 (c), Phosphate buffer solution) on the intensity of both the RLS and FL of the C/N-dots–Ag+ complex system by adding Cys and GSH; the insets corresponded to FL changes; the corresponding columnar changes of fluorescence intensity (d) and RLS intensity (e).
Figure 6(a) The selectivity of the C/N-dots–Ag+ complex system to different AA (100 μM), the insets show (F2-F1/F1) of the C/N-dots–Ag+ complex system with the addition of different AAs; (b) The selectivity of RLS to the C/N-dots–Ag+ system with the addition of various kinds of AA (100 μM), F2 and F1 refer to the intensity of the C/N-dots–Ag+ complex system with and without AAs (100 μM), respectively.
Figure 7(a) The fluorescence spectra of C/N-dots with different concentration of Cys. The insets in (a) illustrate FL intensity against concentration of Cys. The RLS spectra in the presence of different concentration of Cys (b) and GSH (c) respectively. The insets in (b) and (c) illustrate FL intensity of scattering peak against concentration Cys of and GSH, respectively.
Comparison of recently reported fluorescent CDs for detection of Cys and GSH.
| Sample Detection | Linear Range (μM) | LOD (nM) | R2 | Ref. |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cys | 0.1–100 | 80 | 0.998 | [ |
| 1.0–110 | 160 | 0.998 | [ | |
| 0–24 | 140 | 0.985 | [ | |
| 0–167 | 64 | 0.997 | This work | |
| GSH | 0.5–48 | 87 | 0.986/0.984 | [ |
| 1–10 | 300 | 0.997 | [ | |
| 1–200 | 10 | 0.983 | [ | |
| 0–200 | 74 | 0.995 | This work |
Analytical results of Cys in FBS serum sample.
| Sample | Added (μM) | Founded (μM) | Recovery (%) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Serum | 0 | 16.2 | - |
Analytical results of GSH in FBS serum sample.
| Sample | Added (μM) | Founded (μM) | Recovery (%) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Serum | 0 | 78.2 | - |
Figure 8(a) Fluorescence microscope image of C/N-dots and the corresponding bright field transmission image (b) and merged image (c) of Hela-229 cells.