Literature DB >> 31731037

The RISKSUR EVA tool (Survtool): A tool for the integrated evaluation of animal health surveillance systems.

Marisa Peyre1, Linda Hoinville2, James Njoroge3, Angus Cameron4, Daniel Traon5, Flavie Goutard6, Clémentine Calba6, Vladimir Grosbois6, Alexis Delabouglise7, Viktor Varant3, Julian Drewe2, Dirk Pfeiffer2, Barbara Häsler8.   

Abstract

Information about infectious diseases at the global level relies on effective, efficient and sustainable national and international surveillance systems. Surveillance systems need to be regularly evaluated to ensure their performance, the quality of the data and information provided, as well as to allocate resources efficiently. Currently available frameworks for evaluation of surveillance systems in animal or human health often treat technical, process and socio-economic aspects separately instead of integrating them. The surveillance evaluation (EVA) tool, a support tool for the evaluation of animal health surveillance systems, was developed to provide guidance for integrated evaluation of animal health surveillance including economic evaluation. The tool was developed by international experts in surveillance and evaluation in an iterative process of development, testing and revision taking into account existing frameworks and guidance, scientific literature and expert opinion. The EVA tool encompasses a web interface for users to develop an evaluation plan, a Wiki classroom to provide theoretical information on all required concepts and a generic evaluation work plan to facilitate implementation and reporting of outputs to decision makers. The tool was tested by planning and conducting epidemiological and economic evaluations of surveillance for classical and African swine fever, bovine virus diarrhoea, avian influenza, and Salmonella Dublin in five European countries. These practical applications highlighted the importance of a comprehensive evaluation approach to improve the quality of the evaluation outputs (economic evaluation; multiple attributes assessment) and demonstrated the usefulness of the guidance provided by the EVA tool. At the same time they showed that comprehensive evaluations might be constrained by practical issues (e.g. confidentiality concerns, data availability) and resource scarcity. In the long term, the EVA tool is expected to increase professional evaluation capacity and help optimising animal health surveillance system efficiency and resource allocation for both public and private actors of the surveillance systems.
Copyright © 2019 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Animal health; Animal health economics; Assessment; Decision tool; Disease; Evaluation; Surveillance

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31731037     DOI: 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2019.104777

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Prev Vet Med        ISSN: 0167-5877            Impact factor:   2.670


  6 in total

1.  Existence and Quality of Data on Control Programs for EU Non-regulated Cattle Diseases: Consequences for Estimation and Comparison of the Probability of Freedom From Infection.

Authors:  Egle Rapaliute; Annika van Roon; Gerdien van Schaik; Inge Santman-Berends; Xhelil Koleci; Madalina Mincu; Jörn Gethmann; Beate Conrady; Tanja Knific; Jaka Jakob Hodnik; John Berezowski; Luís Pedro Carmo; Aurélien Madouasse; Attila Tarpai; Anton Gerilovych; Alvydas Malakauskas; Blagica Sekovska; Christine Fourichon; Emmanouil Kalaitzakis; Franz-Ferdinand Roch; Hans Houe; Katarzyna Dudek; Kerli Mõtus; László Ózsvári; Lina Costa; Maria Guelbenzu-Gonzalo; Madeleine K Henry; Mentor Alishani; Nicola Pozzato; Petter Hopp; Ramon Juste; Sam Strain; Rene Mandelik; Štefan Vilček; Tiina Autio; Lena-Mari Tamminen; Céline Faverjon
Journal:  Front Vet Sci       Date:  2021-07-19

2.  Mechanisms and Contextual Factors Affecting the Implementation of Animal Health Surveillance in Tanzania: A Process Evaluation.

Authors:  Janeth George; Barbara Häsler; Erick V G Komba; Mark Rweyemamu; Sharadhuli I Kimera; James E D Mlangwa
Journal:  Front Vet Sci       Date:  2022-01-13

3.  Review and Analysis of National Monitoring Systems for Antimicrobial Resistance in Animal Bacterial Pathogens in Europe: A Basis for the Development of the European Antimicrobial Resistance Surveillance Network in Veterinary Medicine (EARS-Vet).

Authors:  Rodolphe Mader; Cristina Muñoz Madero; Birgit Aasmäe; Clémence Bourély; Els M Broens; Luca Busani; Bénédicte Callens; Lucie Collineau; Paloma Crespo-Robledo; Peter Damborg; Maria-Eleni Filippitzi; William Fitzgerald; Annet Heuvelink; Jobke van Hout; Heike Kaspar; Madelaine Norström; Karl Pedersen; Tarja Pohjanvirta; Lucie Pokludova; Fabiana Dal Pozzo; Rosemarie Slowey; Cristiana Teixeira Justo; Anne Margrete Urdahl; Alkiviadis Vatopoulos; Christos Zafeiridis; Jean-Yves Madec; Jean-Philippe Amat
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2022-04-07       Impact factor: 6.064

4.  Assessment of Evaluation Tools for Integrated Surveillance of Antimicrobial Use and Resistance Based on Selected Case Studies.

Authors:  Marianne Sandberg; Ayla Hesp; Cécile Aenishaenslin; Marion Bordier; Houda Bennani; Ursula Bergwerff; Ilias Chantziaras; Daniele De Meneghi; Johanne Ellis-Iversen; Maria-Eleni Filippizi; Koen Mintiens; Liza R Nielsen; Madelaine Norström; Laura Tomassone; Gerdien van Schaik; Lis Alban
Journal:  Front Vet Sci       Date:  2021-07-08

5.  Quantification of the sensitivity of early detection surveillance.

Authors:  A R Cameron; A Meyer; C Faverjon; C Mackenzie
Journal:  Transbound Emerg Dis       Date:  2020-05-14       Impact factor: 4.521

6.  The effectiveness of bovine tuberculosis surveillance in Dutch badgers.

Authors:  Mario Orrico; Gerdien van Schaik; Ad Koets; Jan van den Broek; Margriet Montizaan; Maurice La Haye; Jolianne M Rijks
Journal:  Transbound Emerg Dis       Date:  2021-07-12       Impact factor: 4.521

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.