Literature DB >> 31731025

Improving cell distribution on 3D additive manufactured scaffolds through engineered seeding media density and viscosity.

Maria Cámara-Torres1, Ravi Sinha1, Carlos Mota1, Lorenzo Moroni2.   

Abstract

In order to ensure the long-term in vitro and in vivo functionality of cell-seeded 3D scaffolds, an effective and reliable method to control cell seeding efficiency and distribution is crucial. Static seeding on 3D additive manufactured scaffolds made of synthetic polymers still remains challenging, as it often results in poor cell attachment, high cell sedimentation and non-uniform cell distribution, due to gravity and to the intrinsic macroporosity and surface chemical properties of the scaffolds. In this study, the biocompatible macromolecules dextran and Ficoll (Ficoll-Paque) were used for the first time as temporary supplements to alter the viscosity and density of the seeding media, respectively, and improve the static seeding output. The addition of these macromolecules drastically reduced the cell sedimentation velocities, allowing for homogeneous cell attachment to the scaffold filaments. Both dextran and Ficoll-Paque -based seeding methods supported human mesenchymal stromal cells viability and osteogenic differentiation post-seeding. Interestingly, the improved cell distribution led to increased matrix production and mineralization compared to scaffolds seeded by conventional static method. These results suggest a simple and universal method for an efficient seeding of 3D additive manufactured scaffolds, independent of their material and geometrical properties, and applicable for bone and various other tissue regeneration. STATEMENT OF SIGNIFICANCE: Additive manufacturing has emerged as one of the desired technologies to fabricate complex and patient-specific 3D scaffolds for bone regeneration. Along with the technology, new synthetic polymeric materials have been developed to meet processability requirements, as well as the mechanical properties and biocompatibility necessary for the application. Yet, there is still lack of methodology for a universal cell seeding method applicable to all additive manufactured 3D scaffolds regardless of their characteristics. We believe that our simple and reliable method, which is based on adjusting the cell settling velocity to aid cell attachment, could potentially help to maximize the efficiency, and therefore, functionality of cell-seeded constructs. This is of great importance when aiming for both in vitro and future clinical applications.
Copyright © 2019. Published by Elsevier Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  3D scaffolds; Additive manufacturing; Bone tissue engineering; Macromolecules; Static seeding; Stem cells

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31731025     DOI: 10.1016/j.actbio.2019.11.020

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Biomater        ISSN: 1742-7061            Impact factor:   8.947


  7 in total

1.  3D Culture Modeling of Metastatic Breast Cancer Cells in Additive Manufactured Scaffolds.

Authors:  Afroditi Nanou; Ivan Lorenzo-Moldero; Kyriakos D Gazouleas; Barbara Cortese; Lorenzo Moroni
Journal:  ACS Appl Mater Interfaces       Date:  2022-06-10       Impact factor: 10.383

2.  Application of Hexanoyl Glycol Chitosan as a Non-cell Adhesive Polymer in Three-Dimensional Cell Culture.

Authors:  Da-Eun Kim; Yu Bin Lee; Hye-Eun Shim; Jin Jung Song; Ji-Seok Han; Kyoung-Sik Moon; Kang Moo Huh; Sun-Woong Kang
Journal:  ACS Omega       Date:  2022-05-26

3.  Additive manufactured, highly resilient, elastic, and biodegradable poly(ester)urethane scaffolds with chondroinductive properties for cartilage tissue engineering.

Authors:  S Camarero-Espinosa; C Tomasina; A Calore; L Moroni
Journal:  Mater Today Bio       Date:  2020-04-13

4.  A hybrid additive manufacturing platform to create bulk and surface composition gradients on scaffolds for tissue regeneration.

Authors:  Ravi Sinha; Maria Cámara-Torres; Paolo Scopece; Emanuele Verga Falzacappa; Alessandro Patelli; Lorenzo Moroni; Carlos Mota
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2021-01-21       Impact factor: 14.919

5.  Tuning Cell Behavior on 3D Scaffolds Fabricated by Atmospheric Plasma-Assisted Additive Manufacturing.

Authors:  Maria Cámara-Torres; Ravi Sinha; Paolo Scopece; Thomas Neubert; Kristina Lachmann; Alessandro Patelli; Carlos Mota; Lorenzo Moroni
Journal:  ACS Appl Mater Interfaces       Date:  2021-01-15       Impact factor: 9.229

Review 6.  3D Printing and Bioprinting to Model Bone Cancer: The Role of Materials and Nanoscale Cues in Directing Cell Behavior.

Authors:  Tiziana Fischetti; Gemma Di Pompo; Nicola Baldini; Sofia Avnet; Gabriela Graziani
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2021-08-12       Impact factor: 6.639

7.  A Poly-(ethylene glycol)-diacrylate 3D-Printed Micro-Bioreactor for Direct Cell Biological Implant-Testing on the Developing Chicken Chorioallantois Membrane.

Authors:  Eric Lutsch; Andreas Struber; Georg Auer; Thomas Fessmann; Günter Lepperdinger
Journal:  Micromachines (Basel)       Date:  2022-07-31       Impact factor: 3.523

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.