Literature DB >> 31730874

Incorporating tick feeding behaviour into R0 for tick-borne pathogens.

Simon P Johnstone-Robertson1, Maria A Diuk-Wasser2, Stephen A Davis3.   

Abstract

Tick-borne pathogens pose a considerable disease burden in Europe and North America, where increasing numbers of human cases and the emergence of new tick-borne pathogens has renewed interest in resolving the mechanisms underpinning their geographical distribution and abundance. For Borrelia burgdorferi and tick-borne encephalitis (TBE) virus, transmission of infection from one generation of ticks to another occurs when older nymphal ticks infect younger larval ticks feeding on the same host, either indirectly via systemic infection of the vertebrate host or directly when feeding in close proximity. Here, expressions for the basic reproduction number, R0, and the related tick type-reproduction number, T, are derived that account for the observation that larval and nymphal ticks tend to aggregate on the same minority of hosts, a tick feeding behaviour known as co-aggregation. The pattern of tick blood meals is represented as a directed, acyclic, bipartite contact network, with individual vertebrate hosts having in-degree, kin, and out-degree, kout, that respectively represent cumulative counts of nymphal and larval ticks fed over the lifetime of the host. The in- and out-degree are not independent when co-aggregation occurs such that [Formula: see text] where 〈.〉 indicates expected value. When systemic infection in the vertebrate host is the dominant transmission route R02=T, whereas when direct transmission between ticks co-feeding on the same host is dominant then R0=T and the effect of co-aggregation on R0 is more pronounced. Simulations of B. burgdorferi and TBE virus transmission on theoretical tick-mouse contact networks revealed that aggregation and co-aggregation have a synergistic effect on R0 and T, that co-aggregation always increases R0 and T, and that aggregation only increases R0 and T when larvae and nymphs also co-aggregate. Co-aggregation has the greatest absolute effect on R0 and T when the mean larval burden of hosts is high, and the largest relative effect on R0 for pathogens sustained by co-feeding transmission, e.g. TBE virus in Europe, compared with those predominantly spread by systemic infection, e.g. B. burgdorferi. For both pathogens, though, co-aggregation increases the mean number of ticks infected per infectious tick, T, and so too the likelihood of pathogen persistence.
Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Aggregation; Basic reproduction number; Co-aggregation; Next generation matrix; Tick-borne pathogen transmission network; Tick-host contact network

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31730874      PMCID: PMC6983347          DOI: 10.1016/j.tpb.2019.10.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Theor Popul Biol        ISSN: 0040-5809            Impact factor:   1.570


  40 in total

1.  On the definition and the computation of the basic reproduction ratio R0 in models for infectious diseases in heterogeneous populations.

Authors:  O Diekmann; J A Heesterbeek; J A Metz
Journal:  J Math Biol       Date:  1990       Impact factor: 2.259

2.  Elasticity analysis in epidemiology: an application to tick-borne infections.

Authors:  Amy Matser; Nienke Hartemink; Hans Heesterbeek; Alison Galvani; Stephen Davis
Journal:  Ecol Lett       Date:  2009-09-08       Impact factor: 9.492

Review 3.  Patterns of macroparasite aggregation in wildlife host populations.

Authors:  D J Shaw; B T Grenfell; A P Dobson
Journal:  Parasitology       Date:  1998-12       Impact factor: 3.234

4.  The effects of connectivity on metapopulation persistence: network symmetry and degree correlations.

Authors:  Elad Shtilerman; Lewi Stone
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2015-05-07       Impact factor: 5.349

5.  Seasonal variation in the role of grey squirrels as hosts of Ixodes ricinus, the tick vector of the Lyme disease spirochaete, in a British woodland.

Authors:  N G Craine; S E Randolph; P A Nuttall
Journal:  Folia Parasitol (Praha)       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 2.122

6.  Duration of tick attachment and Borrelia burgdorferi transmission.

Authors:  J Piesman; T N Mather; R J Sinsky; A Spielman
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1987-03       Impact factor: 5.948

7.  Phenology of the tick, Ixodes ricinus, in its southern distribution range (central Spain).

Authors:  A Estrada-Peña; J M Martinez; C Sanchez Acedo; J Quilez; E Del Cacho
Journal:  Med Vet Entomol       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 2.739

8.  Efficient transmission of tick-borne encephalitis virus between cofeeding ticks.

Authors:  M Labuda; L D Jones; T Williams; V Danielova; P A Nuttall
Journal:  J Med Entomol       Date:  1993-01       Impact factor: 2.278

9.  The basic reproduction number for complex disease systems: defining R(0) for tick-borne infections.

Authors:  N A Hartemink; S E Randolph; S A Davis; J A P Heesterbeek
Journal:  Am Nat       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 3.926

10.  Transovarially acquired Lyme disease spirochetes (Borrelia burgdorferi) in field-collected larval Ixodes dammini (Acari: Ixodidae).

Authors:  J Piesman; J G Donahue; T N Mather; A Spielman
Journal:  J Med Entomol       Date:  1986-03-31       Impact factor: 2.278

View more
  1 in total

1.  The Role of Movement Patterns in Epidemic Models on Complex Networks.

Authors:  Alfonso Ruiz-Herrera; Pedro J Torres
Journal:  Bull Math Biol       Date:  2021-08-19       Impact factor: 1.758

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.