Literature DB >> 31730842

Incidence of Strabismus and Amblyopia Among Children Initially Diagnosed With Pseudostrabismus Using the Optum Data Set.

Won Yeol Ryu1, Scott R Lambert2.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To determine the frequency of strabismus among children initially diagnosed with pseudostrabismus using big data.
DESIGN: Population-based retrospective cohort study.
METHODS: Setting: Population-based retrospective cohort study using claims data. StudyPopulation: 17,885 children diagnosed with pseudostrabismus at age ≤3 years who were later diagnosed with strabismus using the Optum deidentified Clinformatics Data Mart Database (2003-2016). We excluded patients diagnosed with strabismus before the diagnosis of pseudostrabismus or diagnosed simultaneously with strabismus and pseudostrabismus. OBSERVATIONS: We assessed age, refractive error, and presence of amblyopia. Patients with pseudostrabismus were compared to a group of patients from the Optum data set diagnosed with esotropia, exotropia, and unspecified heterotropia who had not been previously diagnosed with pseudostrabismus. MainOutcomeMeasures: Incidence of strabismus, among patients initially diagnosed with pseudostrabismus vs those without an initial diagnosis of pseudostrabismus.
RESULTS: Strabismus was diagnosed in 9.6% (n = 1,725) of children initially diagnosed with pseudostrabismus at a median age of 1.65 years (IQR: 1.17-2.46) compared to 1.7% (136,047 of 7,787,743) of children in the control group (P < .001). Strabismus was diagnosed more than a year later in the pseudostrabismus group (3.32 years; IQR: 2.28-4.74) compared with the control group (2.28 years, IQR: 1.43-3.16) (P < .001). Esotropia was the most common type of strabismus in both groups (pseudostrabismus, 69.7%; control, 62.1%). A total of 377 children (21.9%) in the pseudostrabismus group underwent strabismus surgery compared with 12.1% of children in the control group (P < .001).
CONCLUSIONS: Young children diagnosed with pseudostrabismus are at increased risk of developing strabismus and undergoing strabismus surgery.
Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31730842      PMCID: PMC7073278          DOI: 10.1016/j.ajo.2019.10.036

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol        ISSN: 0002-9394            Impact factor:   5.258


  21 in total

1.  Factors associated with a previous diagnosis of strabismus in a population-based sample of 12-year-old Australian children.

Authors:  Dana Robaei; Annette Kifley; Paul Mitchell
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  2006-08-02       Impact factor: 5.258

2.  Early alignment versus delayed alignment in patients with hyperopia and esotropia.

Authors:  Kyung-Ah Park; Sei Yeul Oh
Journal:  J AAPOS       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 1.220

3.  The natural history of surgically untreated intermittent exotropia-looking into the distant future.

Authors:  Kenneth G Romanchuk; Stephanie A Dotchin; Jocelyn Zurevinsky
Journal:  J AAPOS       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 1.220

4.  Pseudostrabismus: an audit.

Authors:  H B Jacobs
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  1978-11       Impact factor: 4.638

5.  The long-term follow-up of accommodative esotropia in a population-based cohort of children.

Authors:  Brian G Mohney; Chrystia C Lilley; Amy E Green-Simms; Nancy N Diehl
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2010-09-29       Impact factor: 12.079

6.  Manifest strabismus following pseudostrabismus diagnosis.

Authors:  Cindy Pritchard; George S Ellis
Journal:  Am Orthopt J       Date:  2007

7.  Prevalence of amblyopia and strabismus in white and African American children aged 6 through 71 months the Baltimore Pediatric Eye Disease Study.

Authors:  David S Friedman; Michael X Repka; Joanne Katz; Lydia Giordano; Josephine Ibironke; Patricia Hawse; James M Tielsch
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2009-09-16       Impact factor: 12.079

8.  Development of Strabismus in Children Initially Diagnosed with Pseudostrabismus.

Authors:  Nazife Sefi-Yurdakul; Betül Tuğcu
Journal:  Strabismus       Date:  2016-05-24

9.  Long-term Surgical Outcomes for Large-angle Infantile Esotropia.

Authors:  Michael J Wan; Hedva Chiu; Ankoor S Shah; David G Hunter
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  2018-02-19       Impact factor: 5.258

10.  Long-term development of refractive error in refractive, nonrefractive and partially accommodative esotropia.

Authors:  Paolo Esposito Veneruso; Dario Bruzzese; Adriano Magli
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-09-24       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  3 in total

1.  Macular and Optic Disc Parameters in Children with Amblyopic and Nonamblyopic Eyes under Optical Coherence Tomography Fundus Images.

Authors:  Dan Zhu; Qiang Sun; Hong Yang; Yangcheng Zou; Chunmei Liu; Yan Xu
Journal:  Comput Math Methods Med       Date:  2022-06-15       Impact factor: 2.809

2.  Accuracy of the International Classification of Diseases, 9th Revision for Identifying Infantile Eye Disease.

Authors:  Timothy T Xu; Cole E Bothun; Tina M Hendricks; Sasha A Mansukhani; Erick D Bothun; Launia J White; Brian G Mohney
Journal:  Ophthalmic Epidemiol       Date:  2021-11-25

3.  Pseudostrabismus in the First Year of Life and the Subsequent Diagnosis of Strabismus.

Authors:  Timothy T Xu; Cole E Bothun; Tina M Hendricks; Sasha A Mansukhani; Erick D Bothun; David O Hodge; Brian G Mohney
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  2020-06-10       Impact factor: 5.258

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.