| Literature DB >> 31730006 |
Dandan Liu1,2, Hang Lv2,3, Qi Liu1,2, Yanli Sun1,2, Shenglong Hou1,2, Lu Zhang1,2, Mengyue Yang1,2, Baihe Han1,2, Gang Wang1,2, Xuedong Wang1,2, Wenjuan Du1,2, Honggang Nie1,2, Ruoxi Zhang1,2, Xingtao Huang1,2, Jingbo Hou4,5, Bo Yu1,2.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Atherosclerosis preferentially develops in regions of disturbed flow (DF). Emerging evidence indicates that yes-associated protein (YAP) and transcriptional co-activator with PDZ-binding motif (TAZ), which are both effectors of the Hippo pathway, sense different blood flow patterns and regulate atherosclerotic lesions. We previously found that methotrexate (MTX) reduces in-stent neoatherosclerosis, decreases the plaque burden, and has an effect on local fluid shear stress. Here, we investigated the atheroprotective effect of MTX under DF and the mechanisms underlying these properties.Entities:
Keywords: AMP-dependent kinase; Human umbilical vein endothelial cells; Methotrexate; Shear stress; YAP/TAZ
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31730006 PMCID: PMC6857284 DOI: 10.1186/s12967-019-02135-8
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Transl Med ISSN: 1479-5876 Impact factor: 5.531
Primers for qRT-PCR
| Gene | Forward | Reverse |
|---|---|---|
| TGATGTTGTAGTGACACCATTTAC | GAAGATGAGGGAAAGAATTAAGGG | |
| ACCGACTGGAAGACACGTTTG | CCAGGTCAGCTTCGCAAGG | |
| TGAAGCGGCTCCCTGTTTT | CGGGTTTCTTTCACAAGGCG | |
| CAGTAAGGCAGGCTGTAAAAGA | TGGAGCTGGTAGACCCTCG | |
| TTGGGCATAGAGACCCCGTT | GCACATTGCTCAGTTCATACACC | |
| CTCAATATTAGAGTCTCAACCCCCA | GAGAAGGCAACTGGACCGAA | |
| CCACCGGAGCACTCCATAAG | GATGGTTCCTTCCGGTGGTT | |
| GCTACAGTGTCCCTCGAACC | CCGGTGCATGTGTCTCCTTA | |
| ATCCCCAACAGACCCGTTTC | GAACGCAGGCTTGCAGAAAA | |
| ACGGATTTGGTCGTATTGGGC | TTGACGGTGCCATGGAATTTG |
Fig. 1Haemodynamic regulation of the activation and nuclear localisation of YAP/TAZ in HUVECs. a Western blot analysis of VCAM1, ICAM1, and YAP/TAZ subjected to USS (unidirectional shear stress), disturbed flow (DF), or static (STA) control. The histograms show quantitative protein levels. Data are presented as mean ± SD from triplicate experiments, *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001 vs. STA. b Western blot analysis of p-YAP and YAP in HUVECs subjected to DF for the indicated time. *p < 0.05, ****p < 0.0001 vs. control. c Immunofluorescence staining of p-YAP and YAP in HUVECs subjected to different flow patterns. YAP (red) and p-YAP (green) were visualised by immunostaining; nuclei were counterstained with propidium iodide (PI, blue). The graphic data are the YAP intensity ratios (nuclear/cytoplasmic) of cells randomly selected from three independent experiments. *p < 0.05, ***p < 0.001 vs. STA. d Representative images of THP1 cell (blue) adhesion to HUVECs for different flows (×50)
Fig. 2MTX treatment increases the level of p-YAP and alleviates the expression of YAP target genes and inflammatory factors. a HUVECs were treated with MTX (0–100 nM) and p-AMPK was quantified after 48 h by a western blot analysis. ***p < 0.001, ****p < 0.0001 vs. control. b qRT-PCR analysis of YAP/TAZ target genes and inflammatory factors for different flows. Results are presented as mean ± SD from three independent experiments from each group. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ****p < 0.0001 vs. STA (static), and #p < 0.05, ##p < 0.01 vs. DF. c HUVECs were treated with or without MTX (100 nM) under USS, and p-YAP (Ser127) was quantified by western blot analysis. **p < 0.01,***p < 0.001 vs. STA. d HUVECs were treated with or without MTX under STA or DF, and p-YAP (Ser127) was quantified by western blot analysis. *p < 0.05, ****p < 0.0001 vs. STA; #p < 0.05 vs. STA + MTX
Fig. 3MTX suppresses YAP activation, whereas silencing AMPKα abolishes this effect. a Representative western blots of p-YAP (Ser127), YAP, p-AMPK, total AMPK (AMPK), β-actin, ICAM-1, and VCAM-1 in HUVECs after each treatment. Values represent the mean ± SD from three independent experiments from each group. **p < 0.01, ****p < 0.0001 vs. DF; ##p < 0.01, ###p < 0.001 vs. DF + MTX. b Immunofluorescence staining of p-YAP and YAP in HUVECs. p-YAP (green) and YAP (red) were visualised by immunostaining; nuclei were counterstained with propidium iodide (PI, blue). Boxed regions are enlarged images. The graphic data are the YAP intensity ratios (nuclear/cytoplasmic) of cells randomly selected from three independent experiments. **p < 0.01 vs. DF, ####p < 0.0001 vs. DF + MTX. MTX decreased YAP nuclear localisation under DF; siAMPKα counteracted the effects. c Representative images of THP1 cell (blue) adhesion to the differently-treated HUVECs under DF. The graphic data show quantification of THP1 cells from three independent experiments. d AMPK, as measured by qRT-PCR (n = 3) and western blotting (n = 3), in HUVECs after transfection with siNC or siAMPKα for 36 h. ***p < 0.001, ****p < 0.0001 vs. siNC
Fig. 4Silencing YAP reduces adhesion molecule expression but does not alter p-AMPK expression under DF. a HUVECs were transfected with siYAP or siNC, subjected to DF for 24 h, and evaluated by western blotting to detect YAP, VCAM1, ICAM1, p-AMPK, and AMPK. *p < 0.05, ***p < 0.001, ****p < 0.0001 vs. DF. b YAP, as measured by qRT-PCR and western blotting, in HUVECs after transfection with siNC or siAMPKα for 36 h. All data are shown as mean ± SD of triplicate experiments and are representative of three independent experiments. **p < 0.01, ****p < 0.0001 vs. siNC
Fig. 5MTX has no effect on DF-induced HUVEC apoptosis and atorvastatin promotes YAP phosphorylation. a HUVECs were incubated with MTX for 48 h and subjected to biomechanical stretch for another 10 h. Apoptosis in HUVECs is shown as flow cytometry dot plots. b As quantified by flow cytometry, DF increased the total apoptosis rate compared to that under static (STA) conditions. However, treatment with MTX did not reduce apoptosis. The percentage of apoptotic cells is presented as the mean ± SD from triplicate experiments. ****p < 0.0001 vs. STA. c Western blotting results (left panel) and quantitative data (right panel) for the protein levels of p-YAP are presented. Values are presented as mean ± SD from three independent experiments. **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001 vs. DF
Fig. 6MTX-treated animals present with a lower plaque burden and lower relative YAP/TAZ expression levels in DF regions. a, b Representative H&E and Masson-stained normal left carotid artery (n = 3) sections from the upstream region of the cast (0.5 mm proximal from the cast) where DF was induced after 0.9% saline treatment for 4 weeks (n = 7) and sections after treatment with MTX (n = 8). c Representative immunofluorescence image of the normal left carotid artery treated with 0.9% saline or MTX. Sections were stained with YAP/TAZ (red) and DAPI (Blue). Sections are stained with anti-CD31 as an endothelial marker (green). MTX-treated animals showed lower relative YAP/TAZ expression levels in DF regions
Fig. 7Schematic diagram of the possible mechanism underlying methotrexate (MTX)-mediated protection of HUVECs against disturbed flow (DF) injury via the activation of AMPK-YAP/TAZ signalling