| Literature DB >> 31729984 |
Mi Yeon Lee1,2, Ga Eun Nam3, Kyungdo Han4, Da Hye Kim4, Yang Hyun Kim5, Kyung Hwan Cho5, Yong Gyu Park6.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Previous studies reported that stature is inversely related to the risk of cardiovascular disease. However, there is limited evidence on the association between height and lipid profiles. We aimed to examine the association of height with total cholesterol and hypercholesterolemia based on the nationally representative dataset of Korean adults.Entities:
Keywords: Adults; Height; Hypercholesterolemia; Total cholesterol
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31729984 PMCID: PMC6858681 DOI: 10.1186/s12944-019-1148-7
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Lipids Health Dis ISSN: 1476-511X Impact factor: 3.876
Characteristics of study participants
| Hypercholesterolemia | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| No | Yes | ||
| N | 11,377 | 2324 | |
| Age (years) | 43.7 ± 0.2 | 54.8 ± 0.4 | < 0.001 |
| Sex (male) | 50.5 (0.5) | 44.5 (1.1) | < 0.001 |
| Current smoker | 22.9 (0.5) | 19.8 (1.1) | 0.009 |
| Alcohol drinker | 60.9 (0.6) | 51.4 (1.2) | < 0.001 |
| Regular exerciser | 50.8 (0.6) | 44.4 (1.3) | < 0.001 |
| Income (the lowest quartile) | 12.6 (0.5) | 20.3 (1.1) | < 0.001 |
| Education (≤middle school graduate) | 21.2 (0.6) | 40.8 (1.3) | < 0.001 |
| Height (cm) | 165.0 ± 0.1 | 161.5 ± 0.3 | < 0.001 |
| Weight (kg) | 64.4 ± 0.1 | 65.5 ± 0.3 | 0.001 |
| BMI (kg/m2) | 23.5 ± 0.0 | 25.0 ± 0.1 | < 0.001 |
| Waist circumference (cm) | 80.5 ± 0.1 | 85.0 ± 0.2 | < 0.001 |
| Systolic blood pressure (mmHg) | 115.2 ± 0.2 | 122.7 ± 0.4 | < 0.001 |
| Diastolic blood pressure (mmHg) | 74.8 ± 0.2 | 77.4 ± 0.3 | < 0.001 |
| Fasting glucose (mg/dL) | 97.1 ± 0.2 | 106.4 ± 0.7 | < 0.001 |
| Total cholesterol (mg/dL) | 183.0 ± 0.3 | 219.6 ± 1.4 | < 0.001 |
| Triglycerides (mg/dL)b | 104.9 (103.5–106.4) | 149.1 (144.7–153.6) | < 0.001 |
| HDL-C (mg/dL) | 51.1 ± 0.1 | 51.9 ± 0.3 | 0.016 |
| LDL-C (mg/dL) | 106.3 ± 0.3 | 130.5 ± 1.3 | < 0.001 |
| Hypertension | 20.3 (0.5) | 45.3 (1.3) | < 0.001 |
| Diabetes mellitus | 7.0 (0.3) | 21.3 (1.0) | < 0.001 |
| Lipid-lowering medication | . | 45.5 (1.3) | |
Data were presented as mean ± standard error or percentage (standard error)
a P-values were obtained using an independent t-test for continuous variables and a chi-square test for categorical variables
b Log transformation was performed for the analysis and presented as geometric mean (95% confidence interval)
Adjusted mean values of total cholesterol according to the quartile groups of height
| Total cholesterol (mg/dL) | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Quartiles of height | Model 1a | Model 2b | Model 3c |
| Q1 | 188.80 ± 0.71 | 190.22 ± 0.70 | 190.41 ± 0.68 |
| Q2 | 188.96 ± 0.72 | 190.43 ± 0.71 | 190.11 ± 0.70 |
| Q3 | 188.40 ± 0.70 | 189.93 ± 0.67 | 189.75 ± 0.66 |
| Q4 | 186.74 ± 0.76 | 188.51 ± 0.73 | 188.38 ± 0.73 |
| P for trend | 0.032 | 0.066 | 0.035 |
Data were presented as mean ± standard error
Values were obtained using multivariable linear regression analysis
a Model 1 was unadjusted
b Model 2 was adjusted for age and sex
c Model 3 was adjusted for age, sex, body mass index, smoking status, alcohol consumption, physical activity, income, education, hypertension, and diabetes mellitus
Odds ratios (95% confidence intervals) of hypercholesterolemia according to quartile groups of height
| Quartiles of height | Model 1a | Model 2b | Model 3c |
|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 | 1 (ref.) | 1 (ref.) | 1 (ref.) |
| Q2 | 0.92 (0.80–1.07) | 0.92 (0.79–1.08) | 0.91 (0.78–1.06) |
| Q3 | 0.83 (0.71–0.96) | 0.83 (0.71–0.98) | 0.83 (0.71–0.99) |
| Q4 | 0.78 (0.67–0.91) | 0.81 (0.69–0.95) | 0.81 (0.69–0.95) |
| P for Trend | 0.001 | 0.006 | 0.007 |
Values were obtained using multivariable logistic regression analysis
a Model 1 was unadjusted
b Model 2 was adjusted for age and sex
c Model 3 was adjusted for age, sex, body mass index, smoking status, alcohol consumption, physical activity, income, education, hypertension, and diabetes mellitus
Fig. 1Adjusted odds ratios of hypercholesterolemia in decile groups of height compared with the lowest decile group (P for trend = 0.020 in total participants, 0.028 in men, and 0.099 in women)
Subgroup analysis
| Subgroup | OR (95% CI) | P for interaction |
|---|---|---|
| Age (years) | 0.101 | |
| 19–39 | 0.62 (0.41–0.95) | |
| 40–64 | 0.87 (0.74–1.03) | |
| ≥65 | 1.09 (0.88–1.36) | |
| Sex | 0.019 | |
| Male | 0.75 (0.62–0.92) | |
| Female | 1.00 (0.85–1.19) | |
| Smoking status | 0.064 | |
| Nonsmoker | 0.88 (0.76–1.01) | |
| Current smoker | 0.94 (0.69–1.26) | |
| Body mass index (kg/m2) | 0.079 | |
| < 25 | 0.87 (0.75–1.02) | |
| ≥25 | 0.91 (0.74–1.13) | |
| Hypertension | 0.044 | |
| No | 0.84 (0.71–0.996) | |
| Yes | 0.97 (0.79–1.19) | |
| Diabetes mellitus | 0.040 | |
| No | 0.87 (0.76–1.00) | |
| Yes | 1.01 (0.75–1.37) |
Values were obtained using multivariable logistic regression analysis after adjusting for age, sex, body mass index, smoking status, alcohol consumption, physical activity, income, education, hypertension, and diabetes mellitus