Literature DB >> 31729636

Radiation chronotherapy-clinical impact of treatment time-of-day: a systematic review.

Dorela D Shuboni-Mulligan1,2, Ghislain Breton3, DeeDee Smart4, Mark Gilbert5, Terri S Armstrong5.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Many brain tumor patients suffer from radiation-induced toxicities. Chronotherapy is a treatment modality that utilizes circadian rhythms to optimize the effect on tumor while minimizing negative outcomes on healthy tissue. This review aims to systematically examine the literature on the application of a radiation chronotherapeutic for all cancers and determine the possible advantages of incorporating a circadian-based fixed time-of-day for radiotherapy into CNS cancers.
METHODS: A systematic review of the literature was conducted in two electronic databases from inception to February 1, 2019. Primary research manuscripts were screened for those related to adult human subjects exposed to ionizing radiation using the chronotherapy technique.
RESULTS: Nine manuscripts were included in the review from 79 eligible articles. Three were prospective randomized trails and 6 were retrospective reviews. This survey revealed that overall survival and tumor control do not have consistent effects with only 60% and 55.5% of paper which included the variables having some significance, respectively. Treatment symptoms were the primary endpoint for both the prospective trials and were examined in 3 of the retrospective reviews; effects were observed in sensitive tissue for all 5 studies including mucosal linings and skin basal layer.
CONCLUSIONS: Existing literature suggests that the application of radiation chronotherapy may reduce negative symptom outcome within highly proliferative tissues. Further examination of radiation chronotherapy in well-designed prospective trials and studies in brain tumor patients are merited.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Chronotherapy; Outcomes; Radiation; Radiotherapy; Symptom burden

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31729636      PMCID: PMC8130840          DOI: 10.1007/s11060-019-03332-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurooncol        ISSN: 0167-594X            Impact factor:   4.130


  82 in total

1.  A DNA damage response screen identifies RHINO, a 9-1-1 and TopBP1 interacting protein required for ATR signaling.

Authors:  Cecilia Cotta-Ramusino; E Robert McDonald; Kristen Hurov; Mathew E Sowa; J Wade Harper; Stephen J Elledge
Journal:  Science       Date:  2011-06-10       Impact factor: 47.728

2.  Cell-intrinsic, Bmal1-dependent Circadian Regulation of Temozolomide Sensitivity in Glioblastoma.

Authors:  Emily A Slat; Jasmin Sponagel; Luciano Marpegan; Tatiana Simon; Najla Kfoury; Albert Kim; Andrea Binz; Erik D Herzog; Joshua B Rubin
Journal:  J Biol Rhythms       Date:  2017-03-16       Impact factor: 3.182

3.  Gamma knife radiosurgery for brain metastasis of nonsmall cell lung cancer: is there a difference in outcome between morning and afternoon treatment?

Authors:  Douglas A Rahn; Dibyendu K Ray; David J Schlesinger; Ladislau Steiner; Jason P Sheehan; John M O'Quigley; Tyvin Rich
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2010-09-09       Impact factor: 6.860

Review 4.  Circadian clock control of the cellular response to DNA damage.

Authors:  Aziz Sancar; Laura A Lindsey-Boltz; Tae-Hong Kang; Joyce T Reardon; Jin Hyup Lee; Nuri Ozturk
Journal:  FEBS Lett       Date:  2010-03-15       Impact factor: 4.124

5.  The symptom burden of primary brain tumors: evidence for a core set of tumor- and treatment-related symptoms.

Authors:  Terri S Armstrong; Elizabeth Vera-Bolanos; Alvina A Acquaye; Mark R Gilbert; Harshad Ladha; Tito Mendoza
Journal:  Neuro Oncol       Date:  2015-08-19       Impact factor: 12.300

6.  Time-dependent sensitivity of rat CFU-GM to total body irradiation.

Authors:  P A Bernabei; M Balzi; R Saccardi; A Becciolini; P R Ferrini
Journal:  Haematologica       Date:  1992 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 9.941

7.  Influence of cigarette smoking on the efficacy of radiation therapy in head and neck cancer.

Authors:  G P Browman; G Wong; I Hodson; J Sathya; R Russell; L McAlpine; P Skingley; M N Levine
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1993-01-21       Impact factor: 91.245

8.  PER2 variation is associated with diurnal preference in a Korean young population.

Authors:  Heon-Jeong Lee; Leen Kim; Seung-Gul Kang; Ho-Kyoung Yoon; Jung-Eun Choi; Young-Min Park; Seog Ju Kim; Daniel F Kripke
Journal:  Behav Genet       Date:  2010-10-08       Impact factor: 2.805

Review 9.  Molecular Aspects of Circadian Pharmacology and Relevance for Cancer Chronotherapy.

Authors:  Narin Ozturk; Dilek Ozturk; Ibrahim Halil Kavakli; Alper Okyar
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2017-10-17       Impact factor: 5.923

10.  Analysis of DNA-damage response to ionizing radiation in serum-shock synchronized human fibroblasts.

Authors:  Samantha Corrà; Riccardo Salvadori; Leonardo Bee; Vito Barbieri; Maddalena Mognato
Journal:  Cell Biol Toxicol       Date:  2017-05-03       Impact factor: 6.691

View more
  12 in total

Review 1.  Circadian Rhythms, Disease and Chronotherapy.

Authors:  Yool Lee; Jeffrey M Field; Amita Sehgal
Journal:  J Biol Rhythms       Date:  2021-09-22       Impact factor: 3.649

Review 2.  The circadian clock and diseases of the skin.

Authors:  Junyan Duan; Elyse Noelani Greenberg; Satya Swaroop Karri; Bogi Andersen
Journal:  FEBS Lett       Date:  2021-09-29       Impact factor: 3.864

3.  Histological analysis of sleep and circadian brain circuitry in cranial radiation-induced hypersomnolence (C-RIH) mouse model.

Authors:  Dorela D Shuboni-Mulligan; Demarrius Young; Julianie De La Cruz Minyety; Nicole Briceno; Orieta Celiku; Amanda L King; Jeeva Munasinghe; Herui Wang; Kendra A Adegbesan; Mark R Gilbert; DeeDee K Smart; Terri S Armstrong
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-07-01       Impact factor: 4.996

Review 4.  Novel Approaches for Assessing Circadian Rhythmicity in Humans: A Review.

Authors:  Derk-Jan Dijk; Jeanne F Duffy
Journal:  J Biol Rhythms       Date:  2020-07-23       Impact factor: 3.182

5.  Reduction of pTau and APP levels in mammalian brain after low-dose radiation.

Authors:  Diego Iacono; Erin K Murphy; Soundarya S Avantsa; Daniel P Perl; Regina M Day
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-01-26       Impact factor: 4.996

Review 6.  Clock at the Core of Cancer Development.

Authors:  Sonal A Patel; Roman V Kondratov
Journal:  Biology (Basel)       Date:  2021-02-14

Review 7.  New Insights Into Cancer Chronotherapies.

Authors:  Jingxuan Zhou; Jiechen Wang; Xiaozhao Zhang; Qingming Tang
Journal:  Front Pharmacol       Date:  2021-12-13       Impact factor: 5.810

8.  Does timing matter in radiotherapy of hepatocellular carcinoma? An experimental study in mice.

Authors:  Soha A Hassan; Amira A H Ali; Dennis Sohn; Ulrich Flögel; Reiner U Jänicke; Horst-Werner Korf; Charlotte von Gall
Journal:  Cancer Med       Date:  2021-09-20       Impact factor: 4.452

Review 9.  Neuroprotective agents effective against radiation damage of central nervous system.

Authors:  Mária Lalkovicova
Journal:  Neural Regen Res       Date:  2022-09       Impact factor: 5.135

Review 10.  Chronoradiobiology of Breast Cancer: The Time Is Now to Link Circadian Rhythm and Radiation Biology.

Authors:  Nicolas Nelson; Joseph Lombardo; Lauren Matlack; Alexandria Smith; Kamryn Hines; Wenyin Shi; Nicole L Simone
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2022-01-25       Impact factor: 5.923

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.