| Literature DB >> 31729372 |
N Auvray1, B Loret1, S Benhabib1, M Cazayous1, R D Zhong2, J Schneeloch2, G D Gu2, A Forget3, D Colson3, I Paul1, A Sacuto1, Y Gallais4.
Abstract
Establishing the presence and the nature of a quantum critical point in their phase diagram is a central enigma of the high-temperature superconducting cuprates. It could explain their pseudogap and strange metal phases, and ultimately their high superconducting temperatures. Yet, while solid evidences exist in several unconventional superconductors of ubiquitous critical fluctuations associated to a quantum critical point, in the cuprates they remain undetected until now. Here using symmetry-resolved electronic Raman scattering in the cuprate [Formula: see text], we report the observation of enhanced electronic nematic fluctuations near the endpoint of the pseudogap phase. While our data hint at the possible presence of an incipient nematic quantum critical point, the doping dependence of the nematic fluctuations deviates significantly from a canonical quantum critical scenario. The observed nematic instability rather appears to be tied to the presence of a van Hove singularity in the band structure.Entities:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31729372 PMCID: PMC6858346 DOI: 10.1038/s41467-019-12940-w
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Nat Commun ISSN: 2041-1723 Impact factor: 14.919
Fig. 1Dynamical nematic fluctuations in a Temperature-doping generic phase diagram of hole-doped cuprates. The pseudogap phase ends at a putative quantum critical point (QCP) located at the doping . b Nematic order breaking the rotational symmetry of the Cu square lattice down to symmetry. The corresponding order parameter has symmetry: in reciprocal space it transforms as − and switches sign upon 90 degrees rotation x y (color scale is defined as blue: negative values, red: positive values and white: 0). c Temperature dependence of the Raman spectrum in the normal state for several doping levels in . The symmetry is obtained using cross-photon polarizations at 45 degrees of the Cu–O–Cu direction (see insets)
Fig. 2Symmetry resolved static susceptibilities. a Temperature dependences of the static susceptibility in 3 different symmetries, , and , as a function of doping. The form factors for each symmetry are depicted in reciprocal space in insets. They are given in terms of the lowest order Brillouin zone harmonics: cos() − cos() for , sin()sin() for , cos() + cos() and cos()cos() for . The error bars correspond to the standard error of the low energy fits used for the low energy extrapolation (see supplementary note 1). b Curie-Weiss fits of the inverse nematic susceptibility for temperatures above max(). The inset shows the full temperature dependence of the inverse susceptibility of OD74 and UD85 where deviation from Curie-Weiss law are observed at , and an additional upturn is observed at . Full and open symbol correspond to data above and below , respectively
Fig. 3Phase diagram of critical nematic fluctuations. Color-coded plot summarizing the evolution of the nematic susceptibility as a function of doping and temperature in Bi2212. The nematic Curie-Weiss temperature is also shown along with the superconducting and pseudogap temperatures. The lines are guide to the eye. The error bars for correspond to the standard error of the Curie-Weiss fits. The inset shows the Fermi surface deformation associated to the incipient Pomeranchuk instability which breaks the symmetry