Literature DB >> 31729141

Climate change disrupts local adaptation and favours upslope migration.

Jill T Anderson1,2, Susana M Wadgymar3.   

Abstract

Contemporary climate change is proceeding at an unprecedented rate. The question remains whether populations adapted to historical conditions can persist under rapid environmental change. We tested whether climate change will disrupt local adaptation and reduce population growth rates using the perennial plant Boechera stricta (Brassicaceae). In a large-scale field experiment conducted over five years, we exposed > 106 000 transplants to historical, current, or future climates and quantified fitness components. Low-elevation populations outperformed local populations under simulated climate change (snow removal) across all five experimental gardens. Local maladaptation also emerged in control treatments, but it was less pronounced than under snow removal. We recovered local adaptation under snow addition treatments, which reflect historical conditions. Our results revealed that low elevation populations risk rapid decline, whereas upslope migration could enable population persistence and expansion at higher elevation locales. Local adaptation to historical conditions could increase vulnerability to climate change, even for geographically widespread species.
© 2019 John Wiley & Sons Ltd/CNRS.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Common garden; elevational gradient; integral projection model; local adaptation; population growth rate; reciprocal transplant

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31729141     DOI: 10.1111/ele.13427

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ecol Lett        ISSN: 1461-023X            Impact factor:   9.492


  10 in total

1.  Plant adaptation to climate change - Where are we?

Authors:  Jill Anderson; Bao-Hua Song
Journal:  J Syst Evol       Date:  2020-06-18       Impact factor: 4.098

2.  Recruitment Traits Could Influence Species' Geographical Range: A Case Study in the Genus Saxifraga L.

Authors:  Vera Margreiter; Francesco Porro; Andrea Mondoni; Brigitta Erschbamer
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2022-05-13       Impact factor: 6.627

3.  The genetic architecture and evolution of life-history divergence among perennials in the Mimulus guttatus species complex.

Authors:  Jenn M Coughlan; Maya Wilson Brown; John H Willis
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2021-04-07       Impact factor: 5.349

4.  Genetic architecture and adaptation of flowering time among environments.

Authors:  Wenjie Yan; Baosheng Wang; Emily Chan; Thomas Mitchell-Olds
Journal:  New Phytol       Date:  2021-02-25       Impact factor: 10.151

5.  Forest fires and climate-induced tree range shifts in the western US.

Authors:  Avery P Hill; Christopher B Field
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2021-11-15       Impact factor: 14.919

6.  DNA Methylation Can Mediate Local Adaptation and Response to Climate Change in the Clonal Plant Fragaria vesca: Evidence From a European-Scale Reciprocal Transplant Experiment.

Authors:  Iris Sammarco; Zuzana Münzbergová; Vít Latzel
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2022-02-28       Impact factor: 5.753

7.  Linking ecological niche models and common garden experiments to predict phenotypic differentiation in stressful environments: Assessing the adaptive value of marginal populations in an alpine plant.

Authors:  Javier Morente-López; Jamie M Kass; Carlos Lara-Romero; Josep M Serra-Diaz; José Carmen Soto-Correa; Robert P Anderson; José M Iriondo
Journal:  Glob Chang Biol       Date:  2022-04-20       Impact factor: 13.211

8.  Non-reproducible signals of adaptation to elevation between open and understorey microhabitats in snapdragon plants.

Authors:  Anaïs Gibert; Sara Marin; Pierick Mouginot; Juliette Archambeau; Morgane Illes; Gabriel Ollivier; Alice Gandara; Benoit Pujol
Journal:  J Evol Biol       Date:  2021-12-20       Impact factor: 2.516

Review 9.  Small spaces, big impacts: contributions of micro-environmental variation to population persistence under climate change.

Authors:  Derek A Denney; M Inam Jameel; Jordan B Bemmels; Mia E Rochford; Jill T Anderson
Journal:  AoB Plants       Date:  2020-02-18       Impact factor: 3.276

10.  Ecological factors influence balancing selection on leaf chemical profiles of a wildflower.

Authors:  Lauren N Carley; Julius P Mojica; Baosheng Wang; Chia-Yu Chen; Ya-Ping Lin; Kasavajhala V S K Prasad; Emily Chan; Che-Wei Hsu; Rose Keith; Chase L Nuñez; Carrie F Olson-Manning; Catherine A Rushworth; Maggie R Wagner; Jing Wang; Pei-Min Yeh; Michael Reichelt; Kathryn Ghattas; Jonathan Gershenzon; Cheng-Ruei Lee; Thomas Mitchell-Olds
Journal:  Nat Ecol Evol       Date:  2021-06-17       Impact factor: 15.460

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.