Literature DB >> 31728819

Mass grave complexity effects on the minimum number of individuals estimation.

Igor Vaduvesković1, Marija Djuric2.   

Abstract

This study analyses the accuracy of the minimum number of individuals (MNI) estimation in the context of commingled human remains recovered from secondary mass graves related to the war in Bosnia in 1995. It is based on data from five secondary mass grave sites of different sizes and different numbers of unassociated body parts. The study is centered on a comparison of MNI estimation from original excavations with the actual number of individuals buried in particular graves, obtained via DNA identification of excavated remains. The aim was to investigate how the complexity of a mass grave reflects on MNI estimation accuracy. In order to quantify mass grave complexity (level of commingling), a ratio between complete bodies and isolated body parts from the same context was introduced. Results show that, in the secondary mass graves involved in the study, MNI estimation inaccuracy varies in the range from 54% to 513% depending on the size of the grave itself and the amount of "loose elements" distributed in it. Correlation between MNI inaccuracy and body to body parts ratio shows a strong relationship indicating that MNI (in)accuracy is largely dependent on the number of loose elements related to complete bodies from the same context.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Commingled human remains; Forensic anthropology; Forensic science; Minimum number of individuals; Secondary mass graves

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31728819     DOI: 10.1007/s12024-019-00186-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Forensic Sci Med Pathol        ISSN: 1547-769X            Impact factor:   2.007


  6 in total

1.  Osteometric sorting of commingled human remains.

Authors:  John E Byrd; Bradley J Adams
Journal:  J Forensic Sci       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 1.832

2.  Estimation of the most likely number of individuals from commingled human skeletal remains.

Authors:  Bradley J Adams; Lyle W Konigsberg
Journal:  Am J Phys Anthropol       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 2.868

3.  Simple algorithms for the estimation of the initial number of individuals in commingled skeletal remains.

Authors:  Efthymia Nikita; Marta M Lahr
Journal:  Am J Phys Anthropol       Date:  2011-10-12       Impact factor: 2.868

4.  A typology of mass grave and mass grave-related sites.

Authors:  Erin Jessee; Mark Skinner
Journal:  Forensic Sci Int       Date:  2005-08-11       Impact factor: 2.395

5.  Keeping the pieces together: comparison of mass grave excavation methodology.

Authors:  Hugh Tuller; Marija Durić'
Journal:  Forensic Sci Int       Date:  2006-01-27       Impact factor: 2.395

6.  Tooth mark artifacts and survival of bones in animal scavenged human skeletons.

Authors:  W D Haglund; D T Reay; D R Swindler
Journal:  J Forensic Sci       Date:  1988-07       Impact factor: 1.832

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.