Thomas Grüter1, Anthonina Ott2, Wolfgang Meyer2, Sven Jarius3, Markus Kinner1, Jeremias Motte1, Kalliopi Pitarokoili1, Ralf Gold1, Lars Komorowski2, Ilya Ayzenberg4,5. 1. Department of Neurology, St. Josef Hospital, Ruhr-University Bochum, Gudrunstr. 56, 44791, Bochum, Germany. 2. Institute for Experimental Immunology, Lübeck, Germany. 3. Molecular Neuroimmunology Group, Department of Neurology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany. 4. Department of Neurology, St. Josef Hospital, Ruhr-University Bochum, Gudrunstr. 56, 44791, Bochum, Germany. ilya_ayzenberg@yahoo.com. 5. Department of Neurology, I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University, Moscow, Russia. ilya_ayzenberg@yahoo.com.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Therapy of autoimmune diseases of the central and peripheral nervous system with intravenous IgG immunoglobulin (IVIg) is well established. Since IVIg is produced from pooled human plasma, autoantibodies can be found in IVIg products and, accordingly, in patient sera after transfusion. The de novo evidence or disappearance of anti-neural autoantibodies after IVIg treatment has so far not been systematically examined. METHODS: We screened 50 neurological patients before and after IVIg treatment for classical onconeural and the most common neurological surface autoantibodies as well as for ganglioside autoantibodies and 23 different antinuclear autoantibodies using immunoblot or cell-based indirect immunofluorescence assays. Furthermore, we screened 31 neurological patients with previously known seropositivity for disappearance of the corresponding antibody after treatment. RESULTS: After IVIg treatment, 90% of all sera were de novo positive for antinuclear antibodies, especially for Ro-52. In contrast, 94% of all sera did not show any de novo-positive anti-neural antibodies. In the remaining three cases, titers were very low. Importantly, 12.9% of all tested sera of patients with known antibody positivity turned false negative after IVIg treatment and titers were falsely low in 37% of the remaining sera. CONCLUSIONS: Here, we present for the first time results of a broad screening for clinically relevant autoantibodies before and after IVIg treatment in neurological patients. We identified a high specificity but reduced sensitivity for anti-neural antibody testing after IVIg transfusion. In contrast, antinuclear antibody testing is not reliable after IVIg treatment. These results are of high practical importance for diagnostic of neuroimmunological diseases.
BACKGROUND: Therapy of autoimmune diseases of the central and peripheral nervous system with intravenous IgG immunoglobulin (IVIg) is well established. Since IVIg is produced from pooled human plasma, autoantibodies can be found in IVIg products and, accordingly, in patient sera after transfusion. The de novo evidence or disappearance of anti-neural autoantibodies after IVIg treatment has so far not been systematically examined. METHODS: We screened 50 neurological patients before and after IVIg treatment for classical onconeural and the most common neurological surface autoantibodies as well as for ganglioside autoantibodies and 23 different antinuclear autoantibodies using immunoblot or cell-based indirect immunofluorescence assays. Furthermore, we screened 31 neurological patients with previously known seropositivity for disappearance of the corresponding antibody after treatment. RESULTS: After IVIg treatment, 90% of all sera were de novo positive for antinuclear antibodies, especially for Ro-52. In contrast, 94% of all sera did not show any de novo-positive anti-neural antibodies. In the remaining three cases, titers were very low. Importantly, 12.9% of all tested sera of patients with known antibody positivity turned false negative after IVIg treatment and titers were falsely low in 37% of the remaining sera. CONCLUSIONS: Here, we present for the first time results of a broad screening for clinically relevant autoantibodies before and after IVIg treatment in neurological patients. We identified a high specificity but reduced sensitivity for anti-neural antibody testing after IVIg transfusion. In contrast, antinuclear antibody testing is not reliable after IVIg treatment. These results are of high practical importance for diagnostic of neuroimmunological diseases.
Authors: S Jarius; F Paul; O Aktas; N Asgari; R C Dale; J de Seze; D Franciotta; K Fujihara; A Jacob; H J Kim; I Kleiter; T Kümpfel; M Levy; J Palace; K Ruprecht; A Saiz; C Trebst; B G Weinshenker; B Wildemann Journal: Nervenarzt Date: 2018-12 Impact factor: 1.214
Authors: Olwen C Murphy; Kevin Messacar; Leslie Benson; Riley Bove; Jessica L Carpenter; Thomas Crawford; Janet Dean; Roberta DeBiasi; Jay Desai; Matthew J Elrick; Raquel Farias-Moeller; Grace Y Gombolay; Benjamin Greenberg; Matthew Harmelink; Sue Hong; Sarah E Hopkins; Joyce Oleszek; Catherine Otten; Cristina L Sadowsky; Teri L Schreiner; Kiran T Thakur; Keith Van Haren; Carolina M Carballo; Pin Fee Chong; Amary Fall; Vykuntaraju K Gowda; Jelte Helfferich; Ryutaro Kira; Ming Lim; Eduardo L Lopez; Elizabeth M Wells; E Ann Yeh; Carlos A Pardo Journal: Lancet Date: 2020-12-23 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: Peter D Burbelo; Riccardo Castagnoli; Chisato Shimizu; Ottavia M Delmonte; Kerry Dobbs; Valentina Discepolo; Andrea Lo Vecchio; Alfredo Guarino; Francesco Licciardi; Ugo Ramenghi; Emma Rey-Jurado; Cecilia Vial; Gian Luigi Marseglia; Amelia Licari; Daniela Montagna; Camillo Rossi; Gina A Montealegre Sanchez; Karyl Barron; Blake M Warner; John A Chiorini; Yazmin Espinosa; Loreani Noguera; Lesia Dropulic; Meng Truong; Dana Gerstbacher; Sayonara Mató; John Kanegaye; Adriana H Tremoulet; Eli M Eisenstein; Helen C Su; Luisa Imberti; Maria Cecilia Poli; Jane C Burns; Luigi D Notarangelo; Jeffrey I Cohen Journal: Front Immunol Date: 2022-03-11 Impact factor: 7.561
Authors: Catharina C Gross; Andreas Schulte-Mecklenbeck; Lohith Madireddy; Marc Pawlitzki; Christine Strippel; Saskia Räuber; Julia Krämer; Leoni Rolfes; Tobias Ruck; Carolin Beuker; Antje Schmidt-Pogoda; Lisa Lohmann; Tilman Schneider-Hohendorf; Tim Hahn; Nicholas Schwab; Jens Minnerup; Nico Melzer; Luisa Klotz; Sven G Meuth; Gerd Meyer Zu Hörste; Sergio E Baranzini; Heinz Wiendl Journal: Brain Date: 2021-10-22 Impact factor: 13.501