OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to compare the efficacy of radiotherapy (RT) combined with transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (TACE) with RT alone for the treatment of bone metastases from renal cell carcinoma (RCC). METHODS: We included in this retrospective study 25 RCC patients (28 bone metastases), who were treated with RT at our institution. Patients were divided into two groups: patients treated with RT alone (monotherapy group; n = 17) and those treated with RT combined with TACE (combined therapy group; n = 11). The administered median RT dose was 30 Gy in 10 fractions. Anti-cancer agents used in TACE were cisplatin (median dose, 50 mg) and carboplatin (median dose, 240 mg) for patients with reduced renal function. We evaluated the objective response, post-RT-skeletal-related event (PR-SRE)-free rate, and adverse events associated with treatment for each group. RESULTS: The objective response rates for bone metastases in the monotherapy and combined therapy groups were 33% and 82%, respectively (p = 0.009). The 2-year PR-SRE-free rate in the monotherapy and combined therapy groups was 41.8% and 100%, respectively (p = 0.009). The objective response and PR-SRE-free rates were significantly superior in the combined therapy than in the monotherapy group. There were no significant differences in adverse events or survival between the two groups. CONCLUSION: RT combined with TACE is a promising treatment for bone metastases from RCC, as it results in higher objective response, and PR-SRE-free rates compared with RT alone. KEY POINTS: • Skeletal-related events (SREs) are common in patients with bone metastases from renal cell carcinoma (RCC). • Radiotherapy (RT) provides pain relief in patients with bone metastases from RCC, but rarely achieves objective response. • Combination of RT with transcatheter arterial chemoembolization results in higher objective response and post-RT-SRE-free rates compared with RT alone and is a promising treatment for bone metastases from RCC, as it.
OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to compare the efficacy of radiotherapy (RT) combined with transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (TACE) with RT alone for the treatment of bone metastases from renal cell carcinoma (RCC). METHODS: We included in this retrospective study 25 RCCpatients (28 bone metastases), who were treated with RT at our institution. Patients were divided into two groups: patients treated with RT alone (monotherapy group; n = 17) and those treated with RT combined with TACE (combined therapy group; n = 11). The administered median RT dose was 30 Gy in 10 fractions. Anti-cancer agents used in TACE were cisplatin (median dose, 50 mg) and carboplatin (median dose, 240 mg) for patients with reduced renal function. We evaluated the objective response, post-RT-skeletal-related event (PR-SRE)-free rate, and adverse events associated with treatment for each group. RESULTS: The objective response rates for bone metastases in the monotherapy and combined therapy groups were 33% and 82%, respectively (p = 0.009). The 2-year PR-SRE-free rate in the monotherapy and combined therapy groups was 41.8% and 100%, respectively (p = 0.009). The objective response and PR-SRE-free rates were significantly superior in the combined therapy than in the monotherapy group. There were no significant differences in adverse events or survival between the two groups. CONCLUSION: RT combined with TACE is a promising treatment for bone metastases from RCC, as it results in higher objective response, and PR-SRE-free rates compared with RT alone. KEY POINTS: • Skeletal-related events (SREs) are common in patients with bone metastases from renal cell carcinoma (RCC). • Radiotherapy (RT) provides pain relief in patients with bone metastases from RCC, but rarely achieves objective response. • Combination of RT with transcatheter arterial chemoembolization results in higher objective response and post-RT-SRE-free rates compared with RT alone and is a promising treatment for bone metastases from RCC, as it.
Entities:
Keywords:
Bone neoplasm; Radiotherapy; Renal cell carcinoma; Therapeutic embolization
Authors: E Calvo; B Escudier; R J Motzer; S Oudard; T E Hutson; C Porta; S Bracarda; V Grünwald; J A Thompson; A Ravaud; D Kim; A Panneerselvam; O Anak; R A Figlin Journal: Eur J Cancer Date: 2011-12-30 Impact factor: 9.162
Authors: Justin Lee; David Hodgson; Edward Chow; Andrea Bezjak; Pamela Catton; Debbie Tsuji; Mary O'Brien; Cyril Danjoux; Charles Hayter; Padraig Warde; Mary K Gospodarowicz Journal: Cancer Date: 2005-11-01 Impact factor: 6.860
Authors: Bernard Escudier; Tim Eisen; Walter M Stadler; Cezary Szczylik; Stéphane Oudard; Michael Staehler; Sylvie Negrier; Christine Chevreau; Apurva A Desai; Frédéric Rolland; Tomasz Demkow; Thomas E Hutson; Martin Gore; Sibyl Anderson; Gloria Hofilena; Minghua Shan; Carol Pena; Chetan Lathia; Ronald M Bukowski Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2009-05-18 Impact factor: 44.544