Jianyuan Zhang1,2, Xinming Zhao3, Yan Zhao4, Jingmian Zhang1, Zhaoqi Zhang1, Jianfang Wang1, Yingchen Wang1, Meng Dai1, Jingya Han1. 1. Department of Nuclear Medicine, The Fourth Hospital of Hebei Medical University, 12 Jiankang Road, Shijiazhuang, 050011, Hebei, China. 2. Department of Nuclear Medicine, Baoding No. 1 Central Hospital, Baoding, 071000, Hebei, China. 3. Department of Nuclear Medicine, The Fourth Hospital of Hebei Medical University, 12 Jiankang Road, Shijiazhuang, 050011, Hebei, China. xinm_zhao@163.com. 4. Department of Medical Oncology, The Fourth Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, 050011, Hebei, China.
Abstract
PURPOSE: To assess the predictive power of pre-therapy 18F-FDG PET/CT-based radiomic features for epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutation status in non-small cell lung cancer. METHODS: Two hundred and forty-eight lung cancer patients underwent pre-therapy diagnostic 18F-FDG PET/CT scans and were tested for genetic mutations. The LIFEx package was used to extract 47 PET and 45 CT radiomic features reflecting tumor heterogeneity and phenotype. The least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) algorithm was used to select radiomic features and develop a radiomics signature. We compared the predictive performance of models established by radiomics signature, clinical variables, and their combinations using receiver operating curves (ROCs). In addition, a nomogram based on the radiomics signature score (rad-score) and clinical variables was developed. RESULTS: The patients were divided into a training set (n = 175) and a validation set (n = 73). Ten radiomic features were selected to build the radiomics signature model. The model showed a significant ability to discriminate between EGFR mutation and EGFR wild type, with area under the ROC curve (AUC) equal to 0.79 in the training set, and 0.85 in the validation set, compared with 0.75 and 0.69 for the clinical model. When clinical variables and radiomics signature were combined, the AUC increased to 0.86 (95% CI [0.80-0.91]) in the training set and 0.87 (95% CI [0.79-0.95]) in the validation set, thus showing better performance in the prediction of EGFR mutations. CONCLUSION: The PET/CT-based radiomic features showed good performance in predicting EGFR mutation in non-small cell lung cancer, providing a useful method for the choice of targeted therapy in a clinical setting.
PURPOSE: To assess the predictive power of pre-therapy 18F-FDG PET/CT-based radiomic features for epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutation status in non-small cell lung cancer. METHODS: Two hundred and forty-eight lung cancerpatients underwent pre-therapy diagnostic 18F-FDG PET/CT scans and were tested for genetic mutations. The LIFEx package was used to extract 47 PET and 45 CT radiomic features reflecting tumor heterogeneity and phenotype. The least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) algorithm was used to select radiomic features and develop a radiomics signature. We compared the predictive performance of models established by radiomics signature, clinical variables, and their combinations using receiver operating curves (ROCs). In addition, a nomogram based on the radiomics signature score (rad-score) and clinical variables was developed. RESULTS: The patients were divided into a training set (n = 175) and a validation set (n = 73). Ten radiomic features were selected to build the radiomics signature model. The model showed a significant ability to discriminate between EGFR mutation and EGFR wild type, with area under the ROC curve (AUC) equal to 0.79 in the training set, and 0.85 in the validation set, compared with 0.75 and 0.69 for the clinical model. When clinical variables and radiomics signature were combined, the AUC increased to 0.86 (95% CI [0.80-0.91]) in the training set and 0.87 (95% CI [0.79-0.95]) in the validation set, thus showing better performance in the prediction of EGFR mutations. CONCLUSION: The PET/CT-based radiomic features showed good performance in predicting EGFR mutation in non-small cell lung cancer, providing a useful method for the choice of targeted therapy in a clinical setting.
Authors: Yong-Il Kim; Jin Chul Paeng; Young Sik Park; Gi Jeong Cheon; Dong Soo Lee; June-Key Chung; Keon Wook Kang Journal: AJR Am J Roentgenol Date: 2018-03-16 Impact factor: 3.959
Authors: Subba R Digumarthy; Atul M Padole; Roberto Lo Gullo; Lecia V Sequist; Mannudeep K Kalra Journal: Medicine (Baltimore) Date: 2019-01 Impact factor: 1.889
Authors: Wei Mu; Evangelia Katsoulakis; Christopher J Whelan; Kenneth L Gage; Matthew B Schabath; Robert J Gillies Journal: Br J Cancer Date: 2021-04-07 Impact factor: 7.640
Authors: Erica L Carpenter; Despina Kontos; Bardia Yousefi; Michael J LaRiviere; Eric A Cohen; Thomas H Buckingham; Stephanie S Yee; Taylor A Black; Austin L Chien; Peter Noël; Wei-Ting Hwang; Sharyn I Katz; Charu Aggarwal; Jeffrey C Thompson Journal: Sci Rep Date: 2021-05-11 Impact factor: 4.379
Authors: Radouane El Ayachy; Nicolas Giraud; Paul Giraud; Catherine Durdux; Philippe Giraud; Anita Burgun; Jean Emmanuel Bibault Journal: Front Oncol Date: 2021-05-05 Impact factor: 6.244