| Literature DB >> 31728456 |
Min Wei1, Fei Zhao1, Shuo Feng1, Huali Jin1.
Abstract
In this work, using DNA and exonuclease-I (Exo-I) as signal amplification strategy, a novel and facile electrochemical aptasensor was constructed for fumonisin B1 (FB1) detection. The G-rich complementary DNA (cDNA) was immobilized onto the electrode surface. Then, aptamer of FB1 was hybridized with cDNA to form double-stranded DNA. In the absence of FB1, double-stranded DNA and G-rich cDNA on the electrode surface promoted effectively methylene blue (MB) enrichment and amplified the initial electrochemical response. In the presence of FB1, the combination of aptamer and FB1 led to the release of aptamer from the electrode surface and the expose of 3' end of single-stranded cDNA. When Exo-I was added onto the electrode surface, the single-stranded cDNA was degraded in the 3'-5' direction. The decrease of double-stranded DNA and G-rich cDNA resulted in the less access of MB to the electrode surface, which decreased the electrochemical signal. The experimental conditions including incubation time of FB1, the amount of Exo-I and incubation time of Exo-I were optimized. Under the optimal conditions, the linear relationship between the change of peak current and the logarithmic concentration of FB1 was observed in the range of 1.0 × 10-3-1000 ng mL-1 with a low limit of detection of 0.15 pg mL-1. The experimental results showed that the prepared aptasensor had acceptable specificity, reproducibility, repeatability and stability. Therefore, this proposed aptasensor has a potential application in the food safety detection.Entities:
Keywords: Electrochemical aptasensor; Exonuclease-I; Fumonisin B1; G-rich DNA; Methylene blue
Year: 2019 PMID: 31728456 PMCID: PMC6842194 DOI: 10.1186/s13065-019-0646-z
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Chem ISSN: 2661-801X
Fig. 1The fabrication and mechanism of the aptasensor
Fig. 2EIS of 10 mM [Fe(CN)6]3−/4− containing 0.1 M KCl on the AuE (a), the cDNA/AuE (b), and the Apt/cDNA/AuE before (c) and after (d) addition of FB1 and Exo-I
Fig. 3The DPV results of MB on the Exo-I/Apt/cDNA/AuE (a), FB1/Apt/cDNA/AuE (b) and Exo-I/FB1/Apt/cDNA/AuE (c) in Tris–HCl buffer
Fig. 4The effect of FB1 incubation time (a), Exo-I amount (b) and Exo-I incubation time (c) on the electrochemical signal
Fig. 5The linear relationship between ∆I and Lg[CFB1] with FB1 concentration in the range of 1 × 10−3 ~ 1000 ng mL−1
Comparison with other reported methods for FB1 detection
| Method | Amplification strategy | Linearity, (ng mL−1) | LOD, (ng mL−1) | Refs. |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Chemiluminescence and enzyme-linked immunosorbent | ECL-ELISA based on anti-FB1 IgG and HRP | 0.14–0.9 | 0.09 | [ |
| Chemiluminescence | Charge-coupled device | 2.5–500 | 2.5 | [ |
| Fluorescence | Anti apt/Apt-NH2/TiO2-PSi | 0.001–10 | 0.21 × 10−3 | [ |
| Fluorescence resonance energy transfer | AuNPs-MB-UCNPs | 0.01–100 | 0.01 | [ |
| Electrochemiluminescence | MIP/Ru@SiO2/CS/AuNPs/GCE | 1 × 10−3 ~ 100 | 0.35 × 10−3 | [ |
| Electrochemical immunosensor | AP-anti-antibody/anti-FB1/FB1-BSA-SWNTs/CS/GCE | 0.01–1000 | 2 × 10−3 | [ |
| Electrochemical immunosensor | Ab-AuNPs-PPy/ErGO-SPE | 200–4500 | 4.2 | [ |
| Electrochemical magneto immunosensor | FB1-HRP/Ab-FB1/MB&protein G/CSPE | 0.73–11.2 | 0.33 | [ |
| Electrochemical aptasensor | Apt-AuNPs-SPCE | 1 × 10−2~50 | 3.4 × 10−3 | [ |
| Electrochemical aptasensor | GS-TH/S2/S1/Au/GCE | 1 × 10−3~1000 | 1 × 10−3 | [ |
| Electrochemical aptasensor | Exo-I/Apt/cDNA/AuE | 1 × 10−3~1000 | 0.15 × 10−3 | This work |
Fig. 6The peak current of aptasensor incubated in different toxins with the same concentration of 1 ng mL−1. a FB1, b OTA, c ZEA, d AFB1, e Blank
Recovery of FB1 in food samples
| Sample | Added (ng mL−1) | Average found (ng mL−1) | Average recovery (%) | RSD (%), n = 3 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beer | 100 | 88.5 | 88.5 | 1.75 |
| 1 | 0.961 | 96.1 | 2.25 | |
| 1 × 10−2 | 0.986 × 10−2 | 98.6 | 5.65 | |
| Corn | 100 | 91.4 | 91.4 | 4.76 |
| 1 | 0.873 | 87.3 | 7.79 | |
| 1 × 10−2 | 1.068 × 10−2 | 106.8 | 6.34 |