A Baltensperger1, D Mirsky2, J Maloney2, I Neuberger2, L Fenton2, T Bernard1, J Borgstede3, N Stence4. 1. From the Department of Pediatrics (A.B., T.B.). 2. Section of Child Neurology, Department of Radiology (D.M., J.M., I.N., L.F., N.S.). 3. Section of Pediatric Radiology, and Department of Radiology (J.B.), University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, Colorado. 4. Section of Child Neurology, Department of Radiology (D.M., J.M., I.N., L.F., N.S.) nicholas.stence@ucdenver.edu.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Cervical arterial dissection is one of the frequent causes of pediatric arterial ischemic stroke. Out of concern for missing cervical arterial dissection in patients in whom pediatric stroke is suspected, our tertiary children's hospital added contrast-enhanced 3D neck MR angiography to every pediatric stoke work-up. This research investigated whether the routine use of contrast-enhanced neck MRA in our MR imaging stroke protocol ever detected a cervical arterial abnormality when the DWI, SWI/gradient recalled-echo, or circle of Willis MRA findings from the brain MR imaging were reported as normal. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The institutional PACS data base was searched for stroke protocol MRIs that included DWI, gradient recalled-echo or SWI, circle of Willis MRA, and 3D contrast-enhanced neck MRA in patients younger than 18 years of age with examinations performed between September 2010 and June 2017. RESULTS: In only a single case (0.15%) were the DWI, SWI/gradient recalled-echo, or circle of Willis MRA findings all separately reported as normal and the contrast-enhanced neck MRA findings reported as abnormal. To reach these findings, we screened 681 patients, which would have resulted in an estimated >$200,000 in Medicare charges and $80,000 in of out-of-pocket cost to patients. CONCLUSIONS: In our large series, the addition of a routine contrast-enhanced neck MRA to our pediatric stroke MR imaging protocol was of extremely low yield. We believe the use of neck MRA should reasonably be limited to cases in which abnormalities are initially detected on standard brain sequences or to patients with atypical presentation or recurrent pathology.
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Cervical arterial dissection is one of the frequent causes of pediatric arterial ischemic stroke. Out of concern for missing cervical arterial dissection in patients in whom pediatric stroke is suspected, our tertiary children's hospital added contrast-enhanced 3D neck MR angiography to every pediatric stoke work-up. This research investigated whether the routine use of contrast-enhanced neck MRA in our MR imaging stroke protocol ever detected a cervical arterial abnormality when the DWI, SWI/gradient recalled-echo, or circle of Willis MRA findings from the brain MR imaging were reported as normal. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The institutional PACS data base was searched for stroke protocol MRIs that included DWI, gradient recalled-echo or SWI, circle of Willis MRA, and 3D contrast-enhanced neck MRA in patients younger than 18 years of age with examinations performed between September 2010 and June 2017. RESULTS: In only a single case (0.15%) were the DWI, SWI/gradient recalled-echo, or circle of Willis MRA findings all separately reported as normal and the contrast-enhanced neck MRA findings reported as abnormal. To reach these findings, we screened 681 patients, which would have resulted in an estimated >$200,000 in Medicare charges and $80,000 in of out-of-pocket cost to patients. CONCLUSIONS: In our large series, the addition of a routine contrast-enhanced neck MRA to our pediatric stroke MR imaging protocol was of extremely low yield. We believe the use of neck MRA should reasonably be limited to cases in which abnormalities are initially detected on standard brain sequences or to patients with atypical presentation or recurrent pathology.
Authors: Mark T Mackay; Max Wiznitzer; Susan L Benedict; Katherine J Lee; Gabrielle A Deveber; Vijeya Ganesan Journal: Ann Neurol Date: 2011-01 Impact factor: 10.422
Authors: Mark T Mackay; Zhi Kai Chua; Michelle Lee; Adriana Yock-Corrales; Leonid Churilov; Paul Monagle; Geoffrey A Donnan; Franz E Babl Journal: Neurology Date: 2014-03-21 Impact factor: 9.910
Authors: David M Mirsky; Lauren A Beslow; Catherine Amlie-Lefond; Pradeep Krishnan; Suzanne Laughlin; Sarah Lee; Laura Lehman; Mubeen Rafay; Dennis Shaw; Michael J Rivkin; Max Wintermark Journal: Pediatr Neurol Date: 2017-01-25 Impact factor: 3.372
Authors: Nicholas V Stence; Laura Z Fenton; Neil A Goldenberg; Jennifer Armstrong-Wells; Timothy J Bernard Journal: Curr Treat Options Neurol Date: 2011-12 Impact factor: 3.598
Authors: Michael Y Uohara; Lauren A Beslow; Lori Billinghurst; Brianna M Jones; Sudha K Kessler; Daniel J Licht; Rebecca N Ichord Journal: JAMA Neurol Date: 2017-03-01 Impact factor: 18.302
Authors: M Wintermark; N K Hills; G A DeVeber; A J Barkovich; T J Bernard; N R Friedman; M T Mackay; A Kirton; G Zhu; C Leiva-Salinas; Q Hou; H J Fullerton Journal: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol Date: 2017-10-05 Impact factor: 3.825
Authors: Heather J Fullerton; Max Wintermark; Nancy K Hills; Michael M Dowling; Marilyn Tan; Mubeen F Rafay; Mitchell S V Elkind; A James Barkovich; Gabrielle A deVeber Journal: Stroke Date: 2015-11-10 Impact factor: 7.914