Literature DB >> 31727415

Evaluation of the efficacy, safety, and clinically recommended dose of dienogest in the treatment of primary dysmenorrhea: a randomized, double-blind, multicenter, placebo-controlled study.

Yutaka Osuga1, Koichi Hayashi2, Shingo Kanda2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy, safety, and clinically recommended dose of dienogest (DNG; 0.5 mg/d, 1 mg/d, and 2 mg/d) in the treatment of primary dysmenorrhea.
DESIGN: A phase II, randomized, double-blind, multicenter, placebo-controlled study.
SETTING: Twenty study sites. PATIENTS: A total of 235 patients with primary dysmenorrhea. INTERVENTION(S): Patients were randomized to receive orally a placebo, DNG (0.5 mg/d, 1 mg/d, or 2 mg/d) or ethinylestradiol 0.02 mg/drospirenone 3 mg (an open-label reference drug) for 12 weeks. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): The primary endpoint was the change from baseline in the dysmenorrhea score at week 12 of treatment. The secondary endpoint was the change from baseline in the visual analogue scale at week 12 of treatment. Subjects were assessed for lower abdominal pain and/or low back pain.
RESULTS: All DNG arms were superior to the placebo arm in terms of the change from baseline in the dysmenorrhea score. The results suggest an equal or greater effect of DNG 1 and 2 mg/d in relieving pain, when compared to the reference drug. In the safety profile of DNG, including irregular uterine bleeding, there was no obvious difference among the doses of DNG. A significant decrease in the serum estradiol concentration compared to that in the placebo arm was not observed in the DNG 1 mg/d arm but was observed in the DNG 2 mg/d arm. CONCLUSION(S): The results suggest that DNG at a dose of 1 mg/d is an effective and well-tolerated treatment for primary dysmenorrhea. TRIAL REGISTRATION: JapicCTI-152977 (en).
Copyright © 2019 American Society for Reproductive Medicine. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Dienogest; double-blind randomized study; placebo-controlled study; primary dysmenorrhea

Year:  2019        PMID: 31727415     DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2019.09.014

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Fertil Steril        ISSN: 0015-0282            Impact factor:   7.329


  3 in total

1.  A Complex Case of Dysmenorrhea and Concurrent Acute Appendicitis.

Authors:  Ahmed Elkhouly; Mohab Hassib; Talha Awwal; Anand Kaji
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2020-06-21

2.  Ovarian reserve may influence the outcome of bone mineral density in patients with long-term use of dienogest.

Authors:  N Yamamoto; O Wada-Hiraike; M Hirano; T Hirata; M Harada; Y Hirota; K Koga; T Fujii; Y Osuga
Journal:  SAGE Open Med       Date:  2021-03-31

Review 3.  Efficacy of Low-Dose Estrogen-Progestins and Progestins in Japanese Women with Dysmenorrhea: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-analysis.

Authors:  Masaru Iwata; Yoshihiro Oikawa; Yutaka Shimizu; Naotaka Sakashita; Ayako Shoji; Ataru Igarashi; Yutaka Osuga
Journal:  Adv Ther       Date:  2022-09-01       Impact factor: 4.070

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.