Giovanni Donato Aquaro1, Yacob Ghebru Habtemicael2, Giovanni Camastra3, Lorenzo Monti4, Santo Dellegrottaglie5, Claudio Moro6, Chiara Lanzillo7, Alessandra Scatteia8, Mauro Di Roma9, Gianluca Pontone10, Martina Perazzolo Marra11, Andrea Barison2, Gianluca Di Bella12. 1. Fondazione Toscana G.Monasterio, Pisa, Italy. Electronic address: aquaro@ftgm.it. 2. Fondazione Toscana G.Monasterio, Pisa, Italy. 3. Cardiac Department, Vannini Hospital Rome, Roma, Italy. 4. Radiology Department, Humanitas Research Hospital, I.R.C.C.S., Rozzano, Milan, Italy. 5. Division of Cardiology, Villa dei Fiori, Acerra, Napoli, Italy; Mount Sinai School of Medicine, New York, New York. 6. U.O. Cardiologia e UTIC, ASST Monza, P.O. Desio, Desio, Italy. 7. Cardiology Department, Policlinico Casilino, Rome, Italy. 8. Department of Advanced Biomedical Sciences, Federico II University, Naples, Italy. 9. Radiological Department, European Hospital, Roma, Italy. 10. Cardiac Department, Centro Cardiologico Monzino, Milano, Italy. 11. Division of Cardiology, Department of Cardiac, Thoracic, and Vascular Sciences, University of Padua, Padua, Italy. 12. Clinical and Experimental Department of Medicine, University of Messina, Messina, Italy.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) is widely used to confirm the diagnosis of acute myocarditis (AM) in the acute setting. CMR is often repeated after 6 months to assess the evolution of myocardial involvement. However, the clinical and prognostic role of 6-month CMR is unknown. OBJECTIVES: This multicenter study aimed to evaluate the clinical and prognostic role of 6-month repetition of CMR in patients with AM. METHODS: In a subgroup of 187 patients from the ITAMY (ITAlian study in MYocarditis) registry, CMR was performed within the first week after symptom onset (CMR-I) and repeated after 6 months (CMR-II). RESULTS: Myocardial edema was detected in all the patients at CMR-I and persisted in 31 (16%) at CMR-II. LGE was detected in 182 (96%) patients at CMR-I and in 164 (86%) at CMR-II. At CMR-II, 20 (11%) patients presented a complete recovery from edema and LGE, 30 (16%) patients had edema with LGE, and 137 (73%) presented LGE without edema. LGE disappeared completely in 18 (10%) patients, the number of LGE segments decreased in 87 (46%), unchanged in 58 (31%), and increased in 26 (14%). During a median clinical follow-up of 7 years (25th to 75th percentile: 6 to 8 years) cardiac events occurred in 22 patients. At Kaplan-Meier curves, patients with LGE and without edema had worse prognosis than others (p < 0.0001). Patients with increased extent of LGE (p = 0.02) had a worse prognosis than those with decreased/unchanged LGE. At multivariate Cox regression analysis, the midwall septal pattern of LGE and the presence of LGE without edema at CMR-II were independent predictors of a cardiac event. CONCLUSIONS: In the acute setting, LGE does not mean definite fibrosis, and it may disappear at 6 months. The presence of LGE without edema at 6-month CMR is associated with worse prognosis, particularly when distributed with a midwall septal pattern. LGE without edema could represent definite fibrosis whereas the presence of edema suggests a residual chance of recovery.
BACKGROUND: Cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) is widely used to confirm the diagnosis of acute myocarditis (AM) in the acute setting. CMR is often repeated after 6 months to assess the evolution of myocardial involvement. However, the clinical and prognostic role of 6-month CMR is unknown. OBJECTIVES: This multicenter study aimed to evaluate the clinical and prognostic role of 6-month repetition of CMR in patients with AM. METHODS: In a subgroup of 187 patients from the ITAMY (ITAlian study in MYocarditis) registry, CMR was performed within the first week after symptom onset (CMR-I) and repeated after 6 months (CMR-II). RESULTS:Myocardial edema was detected in all the patients at CMR-I and persisted in 31 (16%) at CMR-II. LGE was detected in 182 (96%) patients at CMR-I and in 164 (86%) at CMR-II. At CMR-II, 20 (11%) patients presented a complete recovery from edema and LGE, 30 (16%) patients had edema with LGE, and 137 (73%) presented LGE without edema. LGE disappeared completely in 18 (10%) patients, the number of LGE segments decreased in 87 (46%), unchanged in 58 (31%), and increased in 26 (14%). During a median clinical follow-up of 7 years (25th to 75th percentile: 6 to 8 years) cardiac events occurred in 22 patients. At Kaplan-Meier curves, patients with LGE and without edema had worse prognosis than others (p < 0.0001). Patients with increased extent of LGE (p = 0.02) had a worse prognosis than those with decreased/unchanged LGE. At multivariate Cox regression analysis, the midwall septal pattern of LGE and the presence of LGE without edema at CMR-II were independent predictors of a cardiac event. CONCLUSIONS: In the acute setting, LGE does not mean definite fibrosis, and it may disappear at 6 months. The presence of LGE without edema at 6-month CMR is associated with worse prognosis, particularly when distributed with a midwall septal pattern. LGE without edema could represent definite fibrosis whereas the presence of edema suggests a residual chance of recovery.
Authors: Raul D Mitrani; Nitika Dabas; Jarrah Alfadhli; Maureen H Lowery; Thomas M Best; Joshua M Hare; Robert J Myerburg; Jeffrey J Goldberger Journal: Trends Cardiovasc Med Date: 2022-06-16 Impact factor: 8.049
Authors: Fabiola B Sozzi; Elisa Gherbesi; Andrea Faggiano; Eleonora Gnan; Alessio Maruccio; Marco Schiavone; Laura Iacuzio; Stefano Carugo Journal: Front Cardiovasc Med Date: 2022-06-20
Authors: Constantin A Marschner; Kirsten E Shaw; Felipe Sanchez Tijmes; Matteo Fronza; Sharmila Khullar; Michael A Seidman; Paaladinesh Thavendiranathan; Jacob A Udell; Rachel M Wald; Kate Hanneman Journal: Cardiol Clin Date: 2022-05-06 Impact factor: 2.410