Literature DB >> 31726926

How Much? How Fast? How Soon? Three Simple Concepts for Progressing Training Loads to Minimize Injury Risk and Enhance Performance.

Tim J Gabbett.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: When progressing an athlete from rehabilitation to peak performance, load must exceed load capacity. When gradual, systematic increases in load are applied, load capacity will improve. However, if the applied load greatly exceeds load capacity, then tissue tolerance is exceeded and injury may occur. CLINICAL QUESTION: It is well established that a balance exists between providing an adequate training stimulus to elicit performance benefits and minimizing the risk of injury. How can practitioners determine how much training is too much? Following injury, how soon can training loads be progressed? How quickly can athletes return to competition? KEY
RESULTS: When developing rehabilitation or performance programs, 3 concepts are critical: the "floor," the "ceiling," and time. The floor represents the athlete's current capacity, whereas the ceiling represents the capacity needed to perform the specific activities of the sport. A challenge in most sporting environments is the time required to progress from the floor to the ceiling. If athletes' training loads are progressed too rapidly, they will be at increased risk of injury and underperformance. CLINICAL APPLICATION: Rehabilitation practitioners should consider and plan the appropriate amount of time required to progress from the floor (eg, rehabilitation) to the ceiling (eg, return to performance). The resilience and robustness that come from training take time, and different physical capacities will adapt at different rates. Progressive, gradual, and systematic increases in training load allow athletes to safely progress to the ceiling, reducing injury risk, improving availability, and enhancing performance. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2020;50(10):570-573. Epub 15 Nov 2019. doi:10.2519/jospt.2020.9256.

Keywords:  injury prevention; load; rehabilitation; strength and conditioning; training; workload

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31726926     DOI: 10.2519/jospt.2020.9256

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Orthop Sports Phys Ther        ISSN: 0190-6011            Impact factor:   4.751


  6 in total

1.  The Training-Performance Puzzle: How Can the Past Inform Future Training Directions?

Authors:  Tim J Gabbett
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  2020-09-01       Impact factor: 2.860

Review 2.  Developmental Training Model for the Sport Specialized Youth Athlete: A Dynamic Strategy for Individualizing Load-Response During Maturation.

Authors:  Neeru Jayanthi; Stacey Schley; Sean P Cumming; Gregory D Myer; Heather Saffel; Tim Hartwig; Tim J Gabbett
Journal:  Sports Health       Date:  2021-11-11       Impact factor: 3.843

Review 3.  Effects of and Response to Mechanical Loading on the Knee.

Authors:  David S Logerstedt; Jay R Ebert; Toran D MacLeod; Bryan C Heiderscheit; Tim J Gabbett; Brian J Eckenrode
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2021-10-20       Impact factor: 11.136

4.  Return-to-Play Considerations Following a COVID-19 Infection in Elite Athletes.

Authors:  Ryan Ross; Laura Irvin; Rich Severin; Brian Ellis
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  2021-05-26       Impact factor: 3.824

5.  Injury Rates in Major League Baseball During the 2020 COVID-19 Season.

Authors:  Brooks N Platt; Timothy L Uhl; Aaron D Sciascia; Anthony J Zacharias; Nicole G Lemaster; Austin V Stone
Journal:  Orthop J Sports Med       Date:  2021-03-16

6.  Weekly Variations in the Workload of Turkish National Youth Wrestlers: A Season of Complete Preparation.

Authors:  Hadi Nobari; Rui Silva; Filipe Manuel Clemente; Zeki Akyildiz; Luca Paolo Ardigò; Jorge Pérez-Gómez
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-04-06       Impact factor: 3.390

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.