| Literature DB >> 31726695 |
Daniele Almonti1, Gabriele Baiocco2, Vincenzo Tagliaferri1, Nadia Ucciardello1.
Abstract
Paper, a web of interconnected cellulose fibres, is widely used as a base substrate. It has been applied in several applications since it features interesting properties, such as renewability, biodegradability, recyclability, affordability and mechanical flexibility. Furthermore, it offers a broad possibility to modify its surface properties toward specifics additives. The fillers retention and the fibres bonding ability are heavily affected by the cellulose refining process that influences chemical and morphological features of the fibres. Several refining theories were developed in order to determine the best refining conditions. However, it is not trivial to control the cellulose refining as different phenomena occur simultaneously. Therefore, it is intuitively managed by experienced papermakers to improve paper structures and properties. An approach based on the machine learning aimed at estimating the effects of refining on the fibres morphology is proposed in this study. In particular, an artificial neural network (ANN) was implemented and trained with experimental data to predict the fibres length as a function of refining process variables. The prediction of this parameter is crucial to obtain a high-performance process in terms of effectiveness and the optimisation of the final product performance as a function of the process parameter. To achieve these results, data mining of the experimental patterns collected was exploited. It led to the achievement of excellent performance and high accuracy in fibres length prediction.Entities:
Keywords: artificial neural networks; cellulose fibres processing; machine learning; process management; refining optimisation
Year: 2019 PMID: 31726695 PMCID: PMC6888444 DOI: 10.3390/ma12223730
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Materials (Basel) ISSN: 1996-1944 Impact factor: 3.623
Figure 1Schematic of a refining process.
Values of the variables analysed.
| Variables | Min/Max |
|---|---|
| Fibres composition (1–7) | 0/1 |
| Fillers amount | 850/1538 [kg] |
| Net power | 0/158 [kw] |
| Pulp flow rate | 760/1538 [L/min] |
| Wear rate | 1/2352 [h] |
| Fibres length | 0.768/1.140 [mm] |
Figure 2Subdataset creation scheme.
Figure 3Schematic of the first artificial neural network (ANN1) structure.
Figure 4Schematic of the second artificial neural network (ANN2) structure.
Figure 5Validation results of the ANN1.
Figure 6Regression plot of the ANN1 trained with the untreated data.
Correlation coefficients.
| Pulp Flow | Fillers | Power | Time | Length | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pulp flow rate | 1 | 0.061 | 0.272 | 0.081 | −0.300 |
| Fillers amount | 0.061 | 1 | 0.029 | 0.080 | −0.334 |
| Power | 0.272 | 0.029 | 1 | −0.261 | −0.010 |
| Operation hours | 0.081 | 0.080 | −0.261 | 1 | −0.148 |
| Length | −0.300 | −0.334 | −0.010 | −0.148 | 1 |
Figure 7Scatter plot results.
Figure 8Principal component plotted as a function of the explained variance.
Figure 9Patterns distribution in the principal components space.
Figure 10Hierarchical clustering results.
Figure 11Validation results of the ANN2.
Figure 12Regression plot of the ANN2 trained with the treated data.
ANOVA for the neural network model.
| Source | DF | SS | MS | F-value | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Model | 1 | 0.021407 | 0.021407 | 387.57 | 1.3317 × 10−11 |
| Residual | 14 | 0.00077327 | 5.5234 × 10−5 | ||
| Total | 15 | 0.02218 | 0.0014787 |
Validation examples with a nonconcordant length difference.
| Input | Target | Prediction | Actual Delta | Predicted Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0.883 | 0.872 | 0.892 | −0.009 | +0.009 |
| 0.951 | 0.950 | 0.965 | −0.001 | +0.014 |
| 0.867 | 0.867 | 0.862 | 0 | −0.005 |