Literature DB >> 31725941

Negative frequency-dependent selection maintains coexisting genotypes during fluctuating selection.

Caroline B Turner1, Sean W Buskirk2, Katrina B Harris1, Vaughn S Cooper3.   

Abstract

Natural environments are rarely static; rather selection can fluctuate on timescales ranging from hours to centuries. However, it is unclear how adaptation to fluctuating environments differs from adaptation to constant environments at the genetic level. For bacteria, one key axis of environmental variation is selection for planktonic or biofilm modes of growth. We conducted an evolution experiment with Burkholderia cenocepacia, comparing the evolutionary dynamics of populations evolving under constant selection for either biofilm formation or planktonic growth with populations in which selection fluctuated between the two environments on a weekly basis. Populations evolved in the fluctuating environment shared many of the same genetic targets of selection as those evolved in constant biofilm selection, but were genetically distinct from the constant planktonic populations. In the fluctuating environment, mutations in the biofilm-regulating genes wspA and rpfR rose to high frequency in all replicate populations. A mutation in wspA first rose rapidly and nearly fixed during the initial biofilm phase but was subsequently displaced by a collection of rpfR mutants upon the shift to the planktonic phase. The wspA and rpfR genotypes coexisted via negative frequency-dependent selection around an equilibrium frequency that shifted between the environments. The maintenance of coexisting genotypes in the fluctuating environment was unexpected. Under temporally fluctuating environments, coexistence of two genotypes is only predicted under a narrow range of conditions, but the frequency-dependent interactions we observed provide a mechanism that can increase the likelihood of coexistence in fluctuating environments.
© 2019 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  adaptation; bacteria; experimental evolution; population ecology

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31725941      PMCID: PMC6952539          DOI: 10.1111/mec.15307

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Ecol        ISSN: 0962-1083            Impact factor:   6.185


  38 in total

1.  Long-Term Experimental Evolution in Escherichia coli. VIII. Dynamics of a Balanced Polymorphism.

Authors:  Daniel E Rozen; Richard E Lenski
Journal:  Am Nat       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 3.926

2.  Ecological succession in long-term experimentally evolved biofilms produces synergistic communities.

Authors:  Steffen R Poltak; Vaughn S Cooper
Journal:  ISME J       Date:  2010-09-02       Impact factor: 10.302

3.  Different tradeoffs result from alternate genetic adaptations to a common environment.

Authors:  Alejandra Rodríguez-Verdugo; David Carrillo-Cisneros; Andrea González-González; Brandon S Gaut; Albert F Bennett
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2014-08-04       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 4.  Pseudomonas biofilm matrix composition and niche biology.

Authors:  Ethan E Mann; Daniel J Wozniak
Journal:  FEMS Microbiol Rev       Date:  2012-01-23       Impact factor: 16.408

Review 5.  Burkholderia cenocepacia in cystic fibrosis: epidemiology and molecular mechanisms of virulence.

Authors:  P Drevinek; E Mahenthiralingam
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Infect       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 8.067

6.  Escherichia coli rpoB mutants have increased evolvability in proportion to their fitness defects.

Authors:  Jeffrey E Barrick; Mark R Kauth; Christopher C Strelioff; Richard E Lenski
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2010-01-27       Impact factor: 16.240

7.  Pervasive genetic hitchhiking and clonal interference in forty evolving yeast populations.

Authors:  Gregory I Lang; Daniel P Rice; Mark J Hickman; Erica Sodergren; George M Weinstock; David Botstein; Michael M Desai
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2013-07-21       Impact factor: 49.962

8.  Character displacement and the evolution of niche complementarity in a model biofilm community.

Authors:  Crystal N Ellis; Charles C Traverse; Leslie Mayo-Smith; Sean W Buskirk; Vaughn S Cooper
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2015-01-19       Impact factor: 3.694

9.  Trimmomatic: a flexible trimmer for Illumina sequence data.

Authors:  Anthony M Bolger; Marc Lohse; Bjoern Usadel
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2014-04-01       Impact factor: 6.937

10.  Spontaneous mutations and the origin and maintenance of quantitative genetic variation.

Authors:  Wen Huang; Richard F Lyman; Rachel A Lyman; Mary Anna Carbone; Susan T Harbison; Michael M Magwire; Trudy Fc Mackay
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2016-05-23       Impact factor: 8.140

View more
  4 in total

1.  The Nutritional Environment Is Sufficient To Select Coexisting Biofilm and Quorum Sensing Mutants of Pseudomonas aeruginosa.

Authors:  Michelle R Scribner; Amelia C Stephens; Justin L Huong; Anthony R Richardson; Vaughn S Cooper
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  2022-01-03       Impact factor: 3.476

2.  Survival of the first rather than the fittest in a Shewanella electrode biofilm.

Authors:  Eric D Kees; Caleb E Levar; Stephen P Miller; Daniel R Bond; Jeffrey A Gralnick; Antony M Dean
Journal:  Commun Biol       Date:  2021-05-06

3.  Adaptation and phenotypic diversification of Bacillus thuringiensis biofilm are accompanied by fuzzy spreader morphotypes.

Authors:  Yicen Lin; Xinming Xu; Gergely Maróti; Mikael Lenz Strube; Ákos T Kovács
Journal:  NPJ Biofilms Microbiomes       Date:  2022-04-13       Impact factor: 7.290

4.  One gene, multiple ecological strategies: A biofilm regulator is a capacitor for sustainable diversity.

Authors:  Eisha Mhatre; Daniel J Snyder; Emily Sileo; Caroline B Turner; Sean W Buskirk; Nicolas L Fernandez; Matthew B Neiditch; Christopher M Waters; Vaughn S Cooper
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2020-08-19       Impact factor: 11.205

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.