Literature DB >> 31725847

Development of Genome-Derived Tumor Type Prediction to Inform Clinical Cancer Care.

Alexander Penson1,2,3, Niedzica Camacho1,2,4, Youyun Zheng2,4, Anna M Varghese5, Hikmat Al-Ahmadie4, Pedram Razavi5, Sarat Chandarlapaty1,5, Christina E Vallejo4, Efsevia Vakiani2,4, Teresa Gilewski5, Jonathan E Rosenberg5, Maha Shady2,4, Dana W Y Tsui2,4, Dalicia N Reales6, Adam Abeshouse1,2,3, Aijazuddin Syed4, Ahmet Zehir4, Nikolaus Schultz1,2,3, Marc Ladanyi1,4, David B Solit1,2,5,7, David S Klimstra4,8, David M Hyman5,7, Barry S Taylor1,2,3, Michael F Berger1,2,4,8.   

Abstract

IMPORTANCE: Diagnosing the site of origin for cancer is a pillar of disease classification that has directed clinical care for more than a century. Even in an era of precision oncologic practice, in which treatment is increasingly informed by the presence or absence of mutant genes responsible for cancer growth and progression, tumor origin remains a critical factor in tumor biologic characteristics and therapeutic sensitivity.
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate whether data derived from routine clinical DNA sequencing of tumors could complement conventional approaches to enable improved diagnostic accuracy. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: A machine learning approach was developed to predict tumor type from targeted panel DNA sequence data obtained at the point of care, incorporating both discrete molecular alterations and inferred features such as mutational signatures. This algorithm was trained on 7791 tumors representing 22 cancer types selected from a prospectively sequenced cohort of patients with advanced cancer.
RESULTS: The correct tumor type was predicted for 5748 of the 7791 patients (73.8%) in the training set as well as 8623 of 11 644 patients (74.1%) in an independent cohort. Predictions were assigned probabilities that reflected empirical accuracy, with 3388 cases (43.5%) representing high-confidence predictions (>95% probability). Informative molecular features and feature categories varied widely by tumor type. Genomic analysis of plasma cell-free DNA yielded accurate predictions in 45 of 60 cases (75.0%), suggesting that this approach may be applied in diverse clinical settings including as an adjunct to cancer screening. Likely tissues of origin were predicted from targeted tumor sequencing in 95 of 141 patients (67.4%) with cancers of unknown primary site. Applying this method prospectively to patients under active care enabled genome-directed reassessment of diagnosis in 2 patients initially presumed to have metastatic breast cancer, leading to the selection of more appropriate treatments, which elicited clinical responses. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: These results suggest that the application of artificial intelligence to predict tissue of origin in oncologic practice can act as a useful complement to conventional histologic review to provide integrated pathologic diagnoses, often with important therapeutic implications.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 31725847      PMCID: PMC6865333          DOI: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2019.3985

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JAMA Oncol        ISSN: 2374-2437            Impact factor:   31.777


  16 in total

Review 1.  Gut microbiome, big data and machine learning to promote precision medicine for cancer.

Authors:  Giovanni Cammarota; Gianluca Ianiro; Anna Ahern; Carmine Carbone; Andriy Temko; Marcus J Claesson; Antonio Gasbarrini; Giampaolo Tortora
Journal:  Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2020-07-09       Impact factor: 46.802

2.  Impact of 18F-Fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography on management of cancer of unknown primary: systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Sungmin Woo; Anton S Becker; Richard K G Do; Heiko Schöder; Hedvig Hricak; H Alberto Vargas
Journal:  Eur J Cancer       Date:  2021-11-02       Impact factor: 9.162

3.  Mining mutation contexts across the cancer genome to map tumor site of origin.

Authors:  Saptarshi Chakraborty; Axel Martin; Zoe Guan; Colin B Begg; Ronglai Shen
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2021-05-24       Impact factor: 14.919

Review 4.  Artificial intelligence in oncology: Path to implementation.

Authors:  Isaac S Chua; Michal Gaziel-Yablowitz; Zfania T Korach; Kenneth L Kehl; Nathan A Levitan; Yull E Arriaga; Gretchen P Jackson; David W Bates; Michael Hassett
Journal:  Cancer Med       Date:  2021-05-07       Impact factor: 4.452

Review 5.  Artificial Intelligence in Cancer Research and Precision Medicine.

Authors:  Bhavneet Bhinder; Coryandar Gilvary; Neel S Madhukar; Olivier Elemento
Journal:  Cancer Discov       Date:  2021-04       Impact factor: 38.272

6.  CUP-AI-Dx: A tool for inferring cancer tissue of origin and molecular subtype using RNA gene-expression data and artificial intelligence.

Authors:  Yue Zhao; Ziwei Pan; Sandeep Namburi; Andrew Pattison; Atara Posner; Shiva Balachander; Carolyn A Paisie; Honey V Reddi; Jens Rueter; Anthony J Gill; Stephen Fox; Kanwal P S Raghav; William F Flynn; Richard W Tothill; Sheng Li; R Krishna Murthy Karuturi; Joshy George
Journal:  EBioMedicine       Date:  2020-10-09       Impact factor: 8.143

Review 7.  Cancer of Unknown Primary: Challenges and Progress in Clinical Management.

Authors:  Noemi Laprovitera; Mattia Riefolo; Elisa Ambrosini; Christiane Klec; Martin Pichler; Manuela Ferracin
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2021-01-25       Impact factor: 6.639

Review 8.  Horizons in Veterinary Precision Oncology: Fundamentals of Cancer Genomics and Applications of Liquid Biopsy for the Detection, Characterization, and Management of Cancer in Dogs.

Authors:  Jason Chibuk; Andi Flory; Kristina M Kruglyak; Nicole Leibman; Alexis Nahama; Nilesh Dharajiya; Dirk van den Boom; Taylor J Jensen; Jeffrey S Friedman; M Richard Shen; Francisco Clemente-Vicario; Ilya Chorny; John A Tynan; Katherine M Lytle; Lauren E Holtvoigt; Muhammed Murtaza; Luis A Diaz; Dana W Y Tsui; Daniel S Grosu
Journal:  Front Vet Sci       Date:  2021-03-23

Review 9.  Molecular Pathology of Urothelial Carcinoma.

Authors:  Hikmat Al-Ahmadie; George J Netto
Journal:  Surg Pathol Clin       Date:  2021-09

10.  Use of Steroid Profiling Combined With Machine Learning for Identification and Subtype Classification in Primary Aldosteronism.

Authors:  Graeme Eisenhofer; Claudio Durán; Carlo Vittorio Cannistraci; Mirko Peitzsch; Tracy Ann Williams; Anna Riester; Jacopo Burrello; Fabrizio Buffolo; Aleksander Prejbisz; Felix Beuschlein; Andrzej Januszewicz; Paolo Mulatero; Jacques W M Lenders; Martin Reincke
Journal:  JAMA Netw Open       Date:  2020-09-01
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.