| Literature DB >> 31725464 |
Lara Varpio1, Elise Paradis, Sebastian Uijtdehaage, Meredith Young.
Abstract
Health professions education (HPE) researchers are regularly asked to articulate their use of theory, theoretical frameworks, and conceptual frameworks in their research. However, all too often, these words are used interchangeably or without a clear understanding of the differences between these concepts. Further problematizing this situation is the fact that theory, theoretical framework, and conceptual framework are terms that are used in different ways in different research approaches. In this article, the authors set out to clarify the meaning of these terms and to describe how they are used in 2 approaches to research commonly used in HPE: the objectivist deductive approach (from theory to data) and the subjectivist inductive approach (from data to theory). In addition to this, given that within subjectivist inductive research theory, theoretical framework, and conceptual framework can be used in different ways, they describe 3 uses that HPE researchers frequently rely on: fully inductive theory development, fully theory-informed inductive, and theory-informing inductive data analysis.Year: 2020 PMID: 31725464 DOI: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000003075
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Acad Med ISSN: 1040-2446 Impact factor: 6.893