Literature DB >> 31725064

Using a Dual-Input Convolutional Neural Network for Automated Detection of Pediatric Supracondylar Fracture on Conventional Radiography.

Jae Won Choi, Yeon Jin Cho, Seowoo Lee1, Jihyuk Lee, Seunghyun Lee, Young Hun Choi, Jung-Eun Cheon, Ji Young Ha2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to develop a dual-input convolutional neural network (CNN)-based deep-learning algorithm that utilizes both anteroposterior (AP) and lateral elbow radiographs for the automated detection of pediatric supracondylar fracture in conventional radiography, and assess its feasibility and diagnostic performance.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: To develop the deep-learning model, 1266 pairs of AP and lateral elbow radiographs examined between January 2013 and December 2017 at a single institution were split into a training set (1012 pairs, 79.9%) and a validation set (254 pairs, 20.1%). We performed external tests using 2 types of distinct datasets: one temporally and the other geographically separated from the model development. We used 258 pairs of radiographs examined in 2018 at the same institution as a temporal test set and 95 examined between January 2016 and December 2018 at another hospital as a geographic test set. Images underwent preprocessing, including cropping and histogram equalization, and were input into a dual-input neural network constructed by merging 2 ResNet models. An observer study was performed by radiologists on the geographic test set. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) of the model and human readers were calculated and compared.
RESULTS: Our trained model showed an AUC of 0.976 in the validation set, 0.985 in the temporal test set, and 0.992 in the geographic test set. In AUC comparison, the model showed comparable results to the human readers in the geographic test set; the AUCs of human readers were in the range of 0.977 to 0.997 (P's > 0.05). The model had a sensitivity of 93.9%, a specificity of 92.2%, a PPV of 80.5%, and an NPV of 97.8% in the temporal test set, and a sensitivity of 100%, a specificity of 86.1%, a PPV of 69.7%, and an NPV of 100% in the geographic test set. Compared with the developed deep-learning model, all 3 human readers showed a significant difference (P's < 0.05) using the McNemar test, with lower specificity and PPV in the model. On the other hand, there was no significant difference (P's > 0.05) in sensitivity and NPV between all 3 human readers and the proposed model.
CONCLUSIONS: The proposed dual-input deep-learning model that interprets both AP and lateral elbow radiographs provided an accurate diagnosis of pediatric supracondylar fracture comparable to radiologists.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 31725064     DOI: 10.1097/RLI.0000000000000615

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Invest Radiol        ISSN: 0020-9996            Impact factor:   6.016


  15 in total

Review 1.  Diagnostic accuracy and potential covariates of artificial intelligence for diagnosing orthopedic fractures: a systematic literature review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Xiang Zhang; Yi Yang; Yi-Wei Shen; Ke-Rui Zhang; Ze-Kun Jiang; Li-Tai Ma; Chen Ding; Bei-Yu Wang; Yang Meng; Hao Liu
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2022-06-27       Impact factor: 7.034

2.  External Validation of Deep Learning Algorithms for Radiologic Diagnosis: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Alice C Yu; Bahram Mohajer; John Eng
Journal:  Radiol Artif Intell       Date:  2022-05-04

3.  Artificial Intelligence in Fracture Detection: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Rachel Y L Kuo; Conrad Harrison; Terry-Ann Curran; Benjamin Jones; Alexander Freethy; David Cussons; Max Stewart; Gary S Collins; Dominic Furniss
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2022-03-29       Impact factor: 29.146

4.  A pediatric wrist trauma X-ray dataset (GRAZPEDWRI-DX) for machine learning.

Authors:  Eszter Nagy; Michael Janisch; Franko Hržić; Erich Sorantin; Sebastian Tschauner
Journal:  Sci Data       Date:  2022-05-20       Impact factor: 8.501

5.  Artificial intelligence for radiological paediatric fracture assessment: a systematic review.

Authors:  Susan C Shelmerdine; Richard D White; Hantao Liu; Owen J Arthurs; Neil J Sebire
Journal:  Insights Imaging       Date:  2022-06-03

6.  Deep Convolutional Neural Network-Based Diagnosis of Anterior Cruciate Ligament Tears: Performance Comparison of Homogenous Versus Heterogeneous Knee MRI Cohorts With Different Pulse Sequence Protocols and 1.5-T and 3-T Magnetic Field Strengths.

Authors:  Christoph Germann; Giuseppe Marbach; Francesco Civardi; Sandro F Fucentese; Jan Fritz; Reto Sutter; Christian W A Pfirrmann; Benjamin Fritz
Journal:  Invest Radiol       Date:  2020-08       Impact factor: 10.065

7.  Artificial Intelligence to Diagnose Tibial Plateau Fractures: An Intelligent Assistant for Orthopedic Physicians.

Authors:  Peng-Ran Liu; Jia-Yao Zhang; Ming-di Xue; Yu-Yu Duan; Jia-Lang Hu; Song-Xiang Liu; Yi Xie; Hong-Lin Wang; Jun-Wen Wang; Tong-Tong Huo; Zhe-Wei Ye
Journal:  Curr Med Sci       Date:  2021-12-31

8.  Accurate Instance Segmentation in Pediatric Elbow Radiographs.

Authors:  Dixiao Wei; Qiongshui Wu; Xianpei Wang; Meng Tian; Bowen Li
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2021-11-29       Impact factor: 3.576

9.  Deep Learning-Assisted Diagnosis of Pediatric Skull Fractures on Plain Radiographs.

Authors:  Jae Won Choi; Yeon Jin Cho; Ji Young Ha; Yun Young Lee; Seok Young Koh; June Young Seo; Young Hun Choi; Jung-Eun Cheon; Ji Hoon Phi; Injoon Kim; Jaekwang Yang; Woo Sun Kim
Journal:  Korean J Radiol       Date:  2022-01-04       Impact factor: 3.500

10.  AI-based detection and classification of distal radius fractures using low-effort data labeling: evaluation of applicability and effect of training set size.

Authors:  Patrick Tobler; Joshy Cyriac; Balazs K Kovacs; Verena Hofmann; Raphael Sexauer; Fabiano Paciolla; Bram Stieltjes; Felix Amsler; Anna Hirschmann
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2021-03-19       Impact factor: 5.315

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.