Hendrik Joost Wisselink1,2, Gert Jan Pelgrim1, Mieneke Rook1,3, Maarten van den Berge4, Kees Slump2, Yeshu Nagaraj1, Peter van Ooijen1, Matthijs Oudkerk1, Rozemarijn Vliegenthart1,5. 1. University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Center for Medical Imaging, Groningen, The Netherlands. 2. MIRA: Institute for Biomedical Technology and Technical Medicine, University of Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands. 3. Department of Radiology, Martini Hospital, Groningen, The Netherlands. 4. Department of Pulmonology, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, GRIAC Research Institute, Groningen, the Netherlands. 5. Department of Radiology, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: The aim of this phantom study was to investigate the effect of scan parameters and noise suppression techniques on the minimum radiation dose for acceptable image quality for CT emphysema densitometry. METHODS: The COPDGene phantom was scanned on a third generation dual-source CT system with 16 scan setups (CTDIvol 0.035-10.680 mGy). Images were reconstructed at 1.0/0.7 mm slice thickness/increment, with three kernels (one soft, two hard), filtered backprojection and three grades of third-generation iterative reconstruction (IR). Additionally, deep learning-based noise suppression software was applied. Main outcomes: overlap in area of the normalized histograms of CT density for the emphysema insert and lung material, and the radiation dose required for a maximum of 4.3% overlap (defined as acceptable image quality). RESULTS: In total, 384 scan reconstructions were analyzed. Decreasing radiation dose resulted in an exponential increase of the overlap in normalized histograms of CT density. The overlap was 11-91% for the lowest dose setting (CTDIvol 0.035mGy). The soft kernel reconstruction showed less histogram overlap than hard filter kernels. IR and noise suppression also reduced overlap. Using intermediate grade IR plus noise suppression software allowed for 85% radiation dose reduction while maintaining acceptable image quality. CONCLUSION: CT density histogram overlap can quantify the degree of discernibility of emphysema and healthy lung tissue. Noise suppression software, IR, and soft reconstruction kernels substantially decrease the dose required for acceptable image quality. ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE: Noise suppression software, IR, and soft reconstruction kernels allow radiation dose reduction by 85% while still allowing differentiation between emphysema and normal lung tissue.
OBJECTIVE: The aim of this phantom study was to investigate the effect of scan parameters and noise suppression techniques on the minimum radiation dose for acceptable image quality for CT emphysema densitometry. METHODS: The COPDGene phantom was scanned on a third generation dual-source CT system with 16 scan setups (CTDIvol 0.035-10.680 mGy). Images were reconstructed at 1.0/0.7 mm slice thickness/increment, with three kernels (one soft, two hard), filtered backprojection and three grades of third-generation iterative reconstruction (IR). Additionally, deep learning-based noise suppression software was applied. Main outcomes: overlap in area of the normalized histograms of CT density for the emphysema insert and lung material, and the radiation dose required for a maximum of 4.3% overlap (defined as acceptable image quality). RESULTS: In total, 384 scan reconstructions were analyzed. Decreasing radiation dose resulted in an exponential increase of the overlap in normalized histograms of CT density. The overlap was 11-91% for the lowest dose setting (CTDIvol 0.035mGy). The soft kernel reconstruction showed less histogram overlap than hard filter kernels. IR and noise suppression also reduced overlap. Using intermediate grade IR plus noise suppression software allowed for 85% radiation dose reduction while maintaining acceptable image quality. CONCLUSION: CT density histogram overlap can quantify the degree of discernibility of emphysema and healthy lung tissue. Noise suppression software, IR, and soft reconstruction kernels substantially decrease the dose required for acceptable image quality. ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE: Noise suppression software, IR, and soft reconstruction kernels allow radiation dose reduction by 85% while still allowing differentiation between emphysema and normal lung tissue.
Authors: Matthijs Oudkerk; Anand Devaraj; Rozemarijn Vliegenthart; Thomas Henzler; Helmut Prosch; Claus P Heussel; Gorka Bastarrika; Nicola Sverzellati; Mario Mascalchi; Stefan Delorme; David R Baldwin; Matthew E Callister; Nikolaus Becker; Marjolein A Heuvelmans; Witold Rzyman; Maurizio V Infante; Ugo Pastorino; Jesper H Pedersen; Eugenio Paci; Stephen W Duffy; Harry de Koning; John K Field Journal: Lancet Oncol Date: 2017-12 Impact factor: 41.316
Authors: David S Gierada; Andrew J Bierhals; Cliff K Choong; Seth T Bartel; Jon H Ritter; Nitin A Das; Cheng Hong; Thomas K Pilgram; Kyongtae T Bae; Bruce R Whiting; Jason C Woods; James C Hogg; Barbara A Lutey; Richard J Battafarano; Joel D Cooper; Bryan F Meyers; G Alexander Patterson Journal: Acad Radiol Date: 2010-02 Impact factor: 3.173
Authors: Constance de Margerie-Mellon; Cédric de Bazelaire; Claire Montlahuc; Jérôme Lambert; Antoine Martineau; Philippe Coulon; Eric de Kerviler; Catherine Beigelman Journal: Acad Radiol Date: 2016-06-23 Impact factor: 3.173
Authors: John D Newell; Matthew K Fuld; Thomas Allmendinger; Jered P Sieren; Kung-Sik Chan; Junfeng Guo; Eric A Hoffman Journal: Invest Radiol Date: 2015-01 Impact factor: 6.016
Authors: Andrew E Moran; Mohammad H Forouzanfar; Gregory A Roth; George A Mensah; Majid Ezzati; Christopher J L Murray; Mohsen Naghavi Journal: Circulation Date: 2014-02-26 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: David A Lynch; Camille M Moore; Carla Wilson; Dipti Nevrekar; Theodore Jennermann; Stephen M Humphries; John H M Austin; Philippe A Grenier; Hans-Ulrich Kauczor; MeiLan K Han; Elizabeth A Regan; Barry J Make; Russell P Bowler; Terri H Beaty; Douglas Curran-Everett; John E Hokanson; Jeffrey L Curtis; Edwin K Silverman; James D Crapo Journal: Radiology Date: 2018-05-15 Impact factor: 11.105
Authors: Yeshaswini Nagaraj; Gonda de Jonge; Anna Andreychenko; Gabriele Presti; Matthias A Fink; Nikolay Pavlov; Carlo C Quattrocchi; Sergey Morozov; Raymond Veldhuis; Matthijs Oudkerk; Peter M A van Ooijen Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2022-04-01 Impact factor: 7.034
Authors: Hendrik Joost Wisselink; Gert Jan Pelgrim; Mieneke Rook; Ivan Dudurych; Maarten van den Berge; Geertruida H de Bock; Rozemarijn Vliegenthart Journal: Eur Radiol Exp Date: 2021-09-10