Literature DB >> 31724426

Integrating the Hierarchical Taxonomy of Psychopathology (HiTOP) into clinical practice.

Camilo J Ruggero1, Roman Kotov2, Christopher J Hopwood3, Michael First4, Lee Anna Clark5, Andrew E Skodol6, Stephanie N Mullins-Sweatt7, Christopher J Patrick8, Bo Bach9, David C Cicero1, Anna Docherty10, Leonard J Simms11, R Michael Bagby12, Robert F Krueger13, Jennifer L Callahan1, Michael Chmielewski14, Christopher C Conway15, Barbara De Clercq16, Allison Dornbach-Bender1, Nicholas R Eaton17, Miriam K Forbes18, Kelsie T Forbush19, John D Haltigan20, Joshua D Miller21, Leslie C Morey22, Praveetha Patalay23, Darrel A Regier24, Ulrich Reininghaus25, Alexander J Shackman26, Monika A Waszczuk2, David Watson5, Aidan G C Wright27, Johannes Zimmermann28.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Diagnosis is a cornerstone of clinical practice for mental health care providers, yet traditional diagnostic systems have well-known shortcomings, including inadequate reliability, high comorbidity, and marked within-diagnosis heterogeneity. The Hierarchical Taxonomy of Psychopathology (HiTOP) is a data-driven, hierarchically based alternative to traditional classifications that conceptualizes psychopathology as a set of dimensions organized into increasingly broad, transdiagnostic spectra. Prior work has shown that using a dimensional approach improves reliability and validity, but translating a model like HiTOP into a workable system that is useful for health care providers remains a major challenge.
METHOD: The present work outlines the HiTOP model and describes the core principles to guide its integration into clinical practice.
RESULTS: Potential advantages and limitations of the HiTOP model for clinical utility are reviewed, including with respect to case conceptualization and treatment planning. A HiTOP approach to practice is illustrated and contrasted with an approach based on traditional nosology. Common barriers to using HiTOP in real-world health care settings and solutions to these barriers are discussed.
CONCLUSIONS: HiTOP represents a viable alternative to classifying mental illness that can be integrated into practice today, although research is needed to further establish its utility. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2019 APA, all rights reserved).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31724426      PMCID: PMC6859953          DOI: 10.1037/ccp0000452

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Consult Clin Psychol        ISSN: 0022-006X


  31 in total

1.  Why hierarchical dimensional approaches to classification will fail to transform diagnosis in psychiatry.

Authors:  Mark Zimmerman
Journal:  World Psychiatry       Date:  2021-02       Impact factor: 49.548

2.  A detailed hierarchical model of psychopathology: From individual symptoms up to the general factor of psychopathology.

Authors:  Miriam K Forbes; Matthew Sunderland; Ronald M Rapee; Philip J Batterham; Alison L Calear; Natacha Carragher; Camilo Ruggero; Mark Zimmerman; Andrew J Baillie; Samantha J Lynch; Louise Mewton; Tim Slade; Robert F Krueger
Journal:  Clin Psychol Sci       Date:  2021-02-19

3.  Folk Classification and Factor Rotations: Whales, Sharks, and the Problems With the Hierarchical Taxonomy of Psychopathology (HiTOP).

Authors:  Gerald J Haeffel; Bertus F Jeronimus; Bonnie N Kaiser; Lesley Jo Weaver; Peter D Soyster; Aaron J Fisher; Ivan Vargas; Jason T Goodson; Wei Lu
Journal:  Clin Psychol Sci       Date:  2021-05-18

4.  Klerman's "credo" reconsidered: neo-Kraepelinianism, Spitzer's views, and what we can learn from the past.

Authors:  Jerome C Wakefield
Journal:  World Psychiatry       Date:  2022-02       Impact factor: 49.548

5.  The Etiologic, Theory-Based, Ontogenetic Hierarchical Framework of Alcohol Use Disorder: A Translational Systematic Review of Reviews.

Authors:  Cassandra L Boness; Ashley L Watts; Kimberly N Moeller; Kenneth J Sher
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  2021-10       Impact factor: 17.737

6.  Validity and utility of Hierarchical Taxonomy of Psychopathology (HiTOP): I. Psychosis superspectrum.

Authors:  Roman Kotov; Katherine G Jonas; William T Carpenter; Michael N Dretsch; Nicholas R Eaton; Miriam K Forbes; Kelsie T Forbush; Kelsey Hobbs; Ulrich Reininghaus; Tim Slade; Susan C South; Matthew Sunderland; Monika A Waszczuk; Thomas A Widiger; Aidan G C Wright; David H Zald; Robert F Krueger; David Watson
Journal:  World Psychiatry       Date:  2020-06       Impact factor: 49.548

7.  The distribution of daily affect distinguishes internalizing and externalizing spectra and subfactors.

Authors:  Aaron S Heller; Caitlin A Stamatis; Nikki A Puccetti; Kiara R Timpano
Journal:  J Abnorm Psychol       Date:  2021-03-29

8.  DSM-5 alternative model for personality disorders trait domains and PTSD symptoms in a sample of highly traumatized African American women and a prospective sample of trauma center patients.

Authors:  Jessica L Maples-Keller; Courtland S Hyatt; Chelsea E Sleep; Jennifer S Stevens; Emily E Fenlon; Tanja Jovanovic; Barbara O Rothbaum; Kerry J Ressler; Sierra Carter; Bekh Bradley; Negar Fani; Abigail Powers; Vasiliki Michopoulos
Journal:  Personal Disord       Date:  2021-01-14

9.  Treatment Refractory Internalizing Behaviour Across Disorders: An Aetiological Model for Severe Emotion Dysregulation in Adolescence.

Authors:  Pierre C M Herpers; Josephine E C Neumann; Wouter G Staal
Journal:  Child Psychiatry Hum Dev       Date:  2020-08-03

10.  Adult ADHD and emerging models of maladaptive personality: a meta-analytic review.

Authors:  Peter Jacobsson; Christopher J Hopwood; Bo Söderpalm; Thomas Nilsson
Journal:  BMC Psychiatry       Date:  2021-06-01       Impact factor: 3.630

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.