Literature DB >> 31723973

Methodological gaps and opportunities for studying multisectoral collaboration for health in low- and middle-income countries.

Douglas Glandon1, Shinjini Mondal2, Ida Okeyo3, Shehla Zaidi4, Mishal S Khan5, Osman Dar6, Sara Bennett1.   

Abstract

The current body of research into multisectoral collaborations (MSCs) for health raises more questions than it answers, both in terms of how to implement MSCs and how to study them. This article reflects on current methodological gaps and opportunities for advancing MSC research, based on a targeted review of existing literature and qualitative input from researchers and practitioners at the 2018 Health Systems Research (HSR) Symposium in Liverpool. Through framework analysis of 205 MSC research papers referenced in a separately published MSC 'overview of reviews' paper, this article identifies six broad MSC question domains ('meta questions') and applies content analysis to estimate the relative frequency with which these meta questions and the research method(s) used to answer them are present in the literature. Results highlight a preponderance of research exploring MSC implementation using case study methods, which, in aggregate, does not seem to adequately meet policymakers' and practitioners' needs for generalizable or transferable insights. The content analysis is complemented by qualitative insights from HSR Symposium participants and the authors' own experience to identify six key methodological gaps in research on MSC for health. For each of these gaps, we propose areas in which we believe there are opportunities for methodological development and innovation to help advance this field of study, including: better understanding the role of power dynamics in shaping MSCs; development of a classification framework (or frameworks) of governance arrangements; exploring divergence of perspective and experience among MSC partners; identifying or generating theoretical frameworks for MSC that work across sectors and disciplines; developing intermediate indicators of collaboration; and increasing transferability of insights to other contexts. Collaboration with researchers outside of the health sector will enhance efforts in each of these areas, as will the establishment and strengthening of pluralistic MSC evidence networks also involving policymakers and practitioners.
© The Author(s) 2019. Published by Oxford University Press in association with The London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Context; developing countries; evaluation; governance; health systems research; implementation; measurement; research methods; transdisciplinary

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31723973     DOI: 10.1093/heapol/czz116

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Health Policy Plan        ISSN: 0268-1080            Impact factor:   3.344


  9 in total

Review 1.  Examining Intersectoral Action as an Approach to Implementing Multistakeholder Collaborations to Achieve the Sustainable Development Goals.

Authors:  Joslyn Trowbridge; Julia Y Tan; Sameera Hussain; Ahmed Esawi Babiker Osman; Erica Di Ruggiero
Journal:  Int J Public Health       Date:  2022-05-16       Impact factor: 5.100

Review 2.  Adolescent health in the Sustainable Development Goal era: are we aligned for multisectoral action?

Authors:  Asha George; Tanya Jacobs; Rajani Ved; Troy Jacobs; Kumanan Rasanathan; Shehla Abbas Zaidi
Journal:  BMJ Glob Health       Date:  2021-03

3.  Assessment of regional networks on nutrition in South Asia: a multi-methods study.

Authors:  Harriet Torlesse; Jenny Ruducha; Carlyn Mann; Zivai Murira
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2022-01-26       Impact factor: 3.295

4.  'Writing budgets for meetings and teas?': a multitheoretical analysis of intragovernmental coordination for multisectoral action for health in Uganda.

Authors:  Aloysius Ssennyonjo; Freddie Ssengooba; Bart Criel; Kristof Titeca; Sara Van Belle
Journal:  BMJ Glob Health       Date:  2022-02

Review 5.  Meanings and mechanisms of One Health partnerships: insights from a critical review of literature on cross-government collaborations.

Authors:  Syed Shahid Abbas; Tim Shorten; Jonathan Rushton
Journal:  Health Policy Plan       Date:  2022-03-04       Impact factor: 3.344

6.  Whole of government and whole of society approaches: call for further research to improve population health and health equity.

Authors:  Flaminia Ortenzi; Robert Marten; Nicole B Valentine; Aku Kwamie; Kumanan Rasanathan
Journal:  BMJ Glob Health       Date:  2022-07

Review 7.  Multisectoral action for health in low-income and middle-income settings: how can insights from social science theories inform intragovernmental coordination efforts?

Authors:  Aloysius Ssennyonjo; Sara Van Belle; Kristof Titeca; Bart Criel; Freddie Ssengooba
Journal:  BMJ Glob Health       Date:  2021-05

8.  Partnership and Participation-A Social Network Analysis of the 2017 Global Fund Application Process in the Democratic Republic of the Congo and Uganda.

Authors:  Katharine D Shelley; Carol Kamya; Godefroid Mpanya; Salva Mulongo; Shakilah N Nagasha; Emily Beylerian; Herbert C Duber; Bernardo Hernandez; Allison Osterman; David E Phillips; Jessica C Shearer
Journal:  Ann Glob Health       Date:  2020-11-05       Impact factor: 2.462

9.  Multisectoral nutrition planning in Nepal: Evidence from an organizational network analysis.

Authors:  Jenny Ruducha; Amiya Bhatia; Carlyn Mann; Harriet Torlesse
Journal:  Matern Child Nutr       Date:  2021-03-04       Impact factor: 3.092

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.