Literature DB >> 3172373

Complications of penile prostheses in the spinal cord injury population.

K P Collins1, R H Hackler.   

Abstract

A total of 63 spinal cord injury patients underwent penile implantation. Followup ranged from 6 months to 11 years (average 41 months). A semirigid device was used in 53 patients with complications dictating loss of the prosthesis in 17 (33 per cent). The most common complication was spontaneous erosion and most of these occurred after 6 months. Of the 17 patients 8 underwent reimplantation with loss of the prosthesis in 3. Ten patients received an inflatable penile prosthesis and 4 of these were lost. Of the 4 uninfected patients 2 underwent successful reimplantation. Overall, the complication rate in the 63 patients was 33 per cent. After reimplantation 52 of the 63 patients have a functional device, resulting in an ultimate success rate of 82 per cent. In conclusion, penile prostheses have greatly benefited spinal cord injury patients with problems such as sexual dysfunction, maintenance of external appliances and decreasing the rate of skin lacerations. However, these benefits must be weighed against a significant complication rate.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1988        PMID: 3172373     DOI: 10.1016/s0022-5347(17)41905-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Urol        ISSN: 0022-5347            Impact factor:   7.450


  10 in total

Review 1.  Minimizing Penile Implant Infection: A Literature Review of Patient and Surgical Factors.

Authors:  Bradley Holland; Tobias Kohler
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 3.092

2.  Infection rate of penile prosthesis implants in men with spinal cord injury: a meta-analysis of available evidence.

Authors:  Daniele Tienforti; Maria Totaro; Luca Spagnolo; Francesca Di Giulio; Chiara Castellini; Giorgio Felzani; Marco Giorgio Baroni; Sandro Francavilla; Arcangelo Barbonetti
Journal:  Int J Impot Res       Date:  2022-10-18       Impact factor: 2.408

3.  External vacuum device therapy for spinal cord injured males with erectile dysfunction.

Authors:  B Seckin; I Atmaca; Y Ozgok; A Gokalp; C Harmankaya
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 2.370

4.  Erosion of urethra by malleable penile prosthesis in a spinal cord injury patient with diabetes mellitus and repeated misplacement of Foley balloon in the urethra: lessons we learn: a case report.

Authors:  Subramanian Vaidyanathan; Bakul Soni; Rauf Khadr; Peter Hughes
Journal:  Spinal Cord Ser Cases       Date:  2022-01-21

Review 5.  Fertility treatment in spinal cord injury and other neurologic disease.

Authors:  Vera Trofimenko; James M Hotaling
Journal:  Transl Androl Urol       Date:  2016-02

6.  Patient and partner outcome of inflatable and semi-rigid penile prosthesis in a single institution.

Authors:  Ibrahim Halil Bozkurt; Burak Arslan; Tarik Yonguc; Zafer Kozacıoglu; Tansu Degirmenci; Bulent Gunlusoy; Suleyman Minareci
Journal:  Int Braz J Urol       Date:  2015 May-Jun       Impact factor: 1.541

Review 7.  Preoperative counseling and expectation management for inflatable penile prosthesis implantation.

Authors:  Gopal L Narang; Bradley D Figler; Robert M Coward
Journal:  Transl Androl Urol       Date:  2017-11

8.  Risk factors associated with penile prosthesis infection: systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Alejandro Carvajal; Johana Benavides; Herney Andrés García-Perdomo; Gerard D Henry
Journal:  Int J Impot Res       Date:  2020-02-03       Impact factor: 2.896

Review 9.  Penile implant infection prevention part 1: what is fact and what is fiction? Wilson's Workshop #9.

Authors:  Tobias S Köhler; Lexiaochuan Wen; Steven K Wilson
Journal:  Int J Impot Res       Date:  2020-07-21       Impact factor: 2.896

Review 10.  Penile prosthesis surgery in the management of erectile dysfunction.

Authors:  Hossein Sadeghi-Nejad; Mina Fam
Journal:  Arab J Urol       Date:  2013-07-02
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.