Literature DB >> 31723067

The current clinical relevancy of intraoral scanners in implant dentistry.

Takashi Sawase1, Shinichiro Kuroshima1.   

Abstract

Optical technology has provided a paradigm shift in implant dentistry. However, there is little information about the use of optical technology in implant dentistry, since this technology is relatively new and has been evolving under the current conditions. In the present narrative literature review, the effects of intraoral scanners (IOSs) use on accuracy and the operating time, as well as safety and patient perception, in implant dentistry were evaluated from the clinical perspective. The accuracy of digital scans with IOSs was comparable to the conventional impression techniques for single or partial prostheses, and the digital scans with IOSs are time efficient when taking impressions for single- or double-abutments. However, the accuracy and time efficiency are decreased for multiple implant scans or large-area scans with IOSs use. Patient satisfaction with and preference for IOSs scans are generally superior to those with conventional impression procedures.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Clinical relevancy; Digital dentistry; Intraoral scanner

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31723067     DOI: 10.4012/dmj.2019-285

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dent Mater J        ISSN: 0287-4547            Impact factor:   2.102


  9 in total

1.  In Vitro Comparison of Three Intraoral Scanners for Implant-Supported Dental Prostheses.

Authors:  Vitória Costa; António Sérgio Silva; Rosana Costa; Pedro Barreiros; Joana Mendes; José Manuel Mendes
Journal:  Dent J (Basel)       Date:  2022-06-15

2.  A Novel Method for Digital Reconstruction of the Mucogingival Borderline in Optical Scans of Dental Plaster Casts.

Authors:  Leonard Simon Brandenburg; Stefan Schlager; Lara Sophie Harzig; David Steybe; René Marcel Rothweiler; Felix Burkhardt; Benedikt Christopher Spies; Joachim Georgii; Marc Christian Metzger
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-04-24       Impact factor: 4.964

3.  Scanning Distance Influence on the Intraoral Scanning Accuracy-An In Vitro Study.

Authors:  Raul Nicolae Rotar; Andrei Bogdan Faur; Daniel Pop; Anca Jivanescu
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2022-04-22       Impact factor: 3.748

4.  Comparison of the accuracy of different impression procedures in case of multiple and angulated implants : Accuracy of impressions in multiple and angulated implants.

Authors:  M Wafa Richi; Sevcan Kurtulmus-Yilmaz; Oguz Ozan
Journal:  Head Face Med       Date:  2020-05-04       Impact factor: 2.151

Review 5.  Pros and Cons of CAD/CAM Technology for Infection Prevention in Dental Settings during COVID-19 Outbreak.

Authors:  Livia Barenghi; Alberto Barenghi; Umberto Garagiola; Alberto Di Blasio; Aldo Bruno Giannì; Francesco Spadari
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2021-12-22       Impact factor: 3.576

6.  Comparison of Accuracy of Current Ten Intraoral Scanners.

Authors:  Pokpong Amornvit; Dinesh Rokaya; Sasiwimol Sanohkan
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2021-09-13       Impact factor: 3.411

7.  Effect of Implant Angulation on the Rotational Displacement of a 3-Unit Bridge after Digital Impression.

Authors:  Mahnaz Arshad; Amirmohsen Asgari; Mohamad Javad Kharazifard; Narges Ameri
Journal:  Int J Dent       Date:  2022-01-25

8.  Efficiency of occlusal and interproximal adjustments in CAD-CAM manufactured single implant crowns - cast-free vs 3D printed cast-based.

Authors:  Tobias Graf; Jan-Frederik Güth; Christian Diegritz; Anja Liebermann; Josef Schweiger; Oliver Schubert
Journal:  J Adv Prosthodont       Date:  2021-12-22       Impact factor: 1.904

9.  Improved accuracy of digital implant impressions with newly designed scan bodies: an in vivo evaluation in beagle dogs.

Authors:  Ruoxuan Huang; Yuanxiang Liu; Baoxin Huang; Fengxing Zhou; Zhuofan Chen; Zhipeng Li
Journal:  BMC Oral Health       Date:  2021-12-07       Impact factor: 2.757

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.