| Literature DB >> 31722683 |
Morenike Oluwatoyin Folayan1, Olujide Arije2, Maha El Tantawi3, Kikelomo Adebanke Kolawole4, Mary Obiyan5, Olaniyi Arowolo6, Elizabeth O Oziegbe4.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: To determine the association between malnutrition and early childhood caries (ECC) in children resident in sub-urban, Nigeria.Entities:
Keywords: Children; Early childhood caries; Malnutrition; Nigeria
Year: 2019 PMID: 31722683 PMCID: PMC6852898 DOI: 10.1186/s12887-019-1810-2
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Pediatr ISSN: 1471-2431 Impact factor: 2.125
Socio-demographic profile of study participants in the primary study and the current study
| Variables | Total study participants | X2 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Current study | Primary study | ||
| Sex | |||
| Male | 203 (54.86) | 266 (53.52) | 0.15 0.69 |
| Female | 167 (45.14) | 231 (46.48) | |
| Age Group | |||
| 6–23 months | 46 (12.44) | 72 (14.48) | 1.15 0.89 |
| 24–35 months | 74 (20.00) | 95 (19.11) | |
| 36–47 months | 88 (23.79) | 122 (24.55) | |
| 48–59 months | 76 (20.54) | 102 (20.53) | |
| 60–71 months | 86 (23.33) | 106 (21.33) | |
| Socioeconomic Status | |||
| High | 83 (22.43) | 129 (25.96) | 3.32 0.19 |
| Middle | 161 (43.52) | 226 (45.47) | |
| Low | 126 (34.05) | 142 (28.57) | |
| Caries | |||
| Present | 18 (4.86) | 33 (6.64) | 1.75 0.19 |
| Absent | 352 (95.14) | 434 (93.36) | |
X2represents chi-square
Association between ECC and sex, age, socioeconomic status, maternal knowledge of caries prevention, frequency of consumption of sugar, oral hygiene status and malnutrition (N = 370)
| Variables | ECC status | Test of Association | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Absent ( | Present ( | |||||
| N | % | N | % | |||
| Sex | ||||||
| Male | 196 | 55.68 | 7 | 38.89 | X2 | 1.95 0.16 |
| Female | 156 | 44.32 | 11 | 61.11 | ||
| Age Group | ||||||
| 6–23 months | 46 | 13.07 | 0 | 0.00 | X2 | 11.69 0.02* |
| 24–35 months | 74 | 21.02 | 0 | 0.00 | ||
| 36–47 months | 83 | 23.58 | 5 | 27.78 | ||
| 48–59 months | 68 | 19.32 | 8 | 44.44 | ||
| 60–71 months | 81 | 23.01 | 5 | 27.78 | ||
| Socioeconomic Status | ||||||
| High | 77 | 21.88 | 6 | 33.33 | X2 | 3.36 0.19 |
| Middle | 157 | 44.60 | 4 | 22.23 | ||
| Low | 118 | 33.52 | 8 | 44.44 | ||
| Mother’s Knowledge of Oral Health | ||||||
| Poor | 109 | 30.97 | 6 | 33.33 | X2 | 0.05 0.83 |
| Good | 243 | 69.03 | 12 | 66.67 | ||
| Frequency of Sugar Consumption in Between Meals | ||||||
| < 3 times daily | 297 | 84.38 | 13 | 72.22 | X2 | 1.86 0.17 |
| ≥ 3 times daily | 55 | 15.62 | 5 | 27.78 | ||
| Oral Hygiene Status | ||||||
| Good | 248 | 70.45 | 10 | 65.56 | X2 | 2.24 0.29 |
| Fair | 96 | 27.27 | 8 | 44.44 | ||
| Poor | 8 | 2.28 | 0 | 0.00 | ||
| Wasting (WAZ) | ||||||
| Normal | 287 | 81.53 | 16 | 88.89 | Exact test | -0.75 |
| Wasted | 65 | 18.47 | 2 | 11.11 | ||
| Stunting (HAZ) | ||||||
| Normal | 234 | 66.48 | 16 | 88.89 | Exact test | -0.07 |
| Stunted | 118 | 33.52 | 2 | 11.11 | ||
| Underweight/Overweight (WHZ) | ||||||
| Normal | 316 | 89.78 | 14 | 77.78 | X2 | 3.14 0.16 |
| Underweight | 18 | 5.11 | 2 | 11.11 | ||
| Overweight | 18 | 5.11 | 2 | 11.11 | ||
*Statistically significant at P < 0.05
X2represents chi-square
Poisson regression model for risk indicators of early childhood caries using robust variance estimation (N = 370)
| Variables | Model 1 | Model 2 | Model 3 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wasting (WAZ) | ||||||
| Normal | 1.00 | – | 1.00 | – | 1.00 | – |
| Wasted - PR (CI) | 0.90 (0.24–3.28) | 0.87 | 0.98 (0.27–3.60) | 0.98 | 1.08 (0.19–6.26) | 0.93 |
| Stunting (HAZ) | ||||||
| Normal | 1.00 | – | 1.00 | – | 1.00 | – |
| Stunted - PR (CI) | 0.26 (0.07–1.05) | 0.06 | 0.25 (0.06–1.04) | 0.06 | 0.14 (0.03–0.69) | 0.02* |
| Underweight/Overweight (WHZ) | ||||||
| Normal | 1.00 | – | 1.00 | – | 1.00 | – |
| Underweight- PR (CI) | 1.05 (0.17–6.50) | 0.96 | 1.26 (0.20–8.06) | 0.81 | 0.00 (0.00–0.00) | < 0.001* |
| Overweight- PR (CI) | 2.06 (0.51–8.32) | 0.31 | 2.33 (0.55–9.89) | 0.25 | 6.88 (1.83–25.85) | < 0.001* |
| SEX | ||||||
| Male | 1.00 | – | 1.00 | – | ||
| Female- PR (CI) | 2.31 (0.89–6.00) | 0.09 | 2.90 (0.91–9.29) | 0.07 | ||
| Socioeconomic status | ||||||
| High | 1.00 | – | 1.00 | – | ||
| Middle - PR (CI) | 0.39 (0.11–1.39) | 0.15 | 0.41 (0.08–2.02) | 0.27 | ||
| Low - PR (CI) | 1.10 (0.37–3.26) | 0.86 | 2.40 (0.62–9.34) | 0.21 | ||
| Oral hygiene status | ||||||
| Good | 1.00 | – | ||||
| Fair- PR (CI) | 2.81 (1.02–7.74) | 0.05* | ||||
| Poor - PR (CI) | 0.00 (0.00–0.00) | < 0.001* | ||||
| Frequency of daily consumption of sugar | ||||||
| < 3 times daily | 1.00 | – | ||||
| ≥ 3 times daily - PR (CI) | 2.18 (0.5–9.53) | 0.30 | ||||
| Maternal knowledge of caries prevention | ||||||
| Poor | 1.00 | – | ||||
| Good - PR (CI) | 1.24 (0.31–4.93) | 0.76 | ||||
| Pseudo R2 | 0.04 | 0.08 | 0.18 | |||
APR adjusted prevalence ratio, CI confidence interval
Model 1 includes four malnutrition factors: wasted, stunted, overweight and underweight. Model 2: includes Model 1 variables plus demographic variables (gender and socioeconomic status). Model 3: includes Model 2 variables plus oral hygiene status, frequency of sugar consumption and maternal knowledge of caries prevention
*Statistically significant at P < 0.05