Literature DB >> 31721901

Screening potential prognostic biomarkers of long non-coding RNAs for predicting the risk of chronic kidney disease.

Na Li1, Yan Cui2, Min Yin1, Feng Liu1.   

Abstract

Not much is known about the roles of long non-coding RNAs (lncRNAs) for chronic kidney disease (CKD). In this study, we included CKD patient cohorts and normal controls as a discovery cohort to identify putative lncRNA biomarkers associated with CKD. We first compared the lncRNA expression profiles of CKD patients with normal controls, and identified differentially expressed lncRNAs and mRNAs. Co-expression network based on the enriched differentially expressed mRNAs and lncRNAs was constructed using WGCNA to identify important modules related to CKD. A lncRNA-miRNA-mRNA pathway network based on the hub lncRNAs and mRNAs, related miRNAs, and overlapping pathways was further constructed to reveal putative biomarkers. A total of 821 significantly differentially expressed mRNAs and lncRNAs were screened between CKD and control samples, which were enriched in nine modules using weighted correlation network analysis (WGCNA), especially brown and yellow modules. Co-expression network based on the enriched differentially expressed mRNAs and lncRNAs in brown and yellow modules uncovered 7 hub lncRNAs and 53 hub mRNAs. A lncRNA-miRNA-mRNA pathway network further revealed that lncRNAs of HCP5 and NOP14-AS1 and genes of CCND2, COL3A1, COL4A1, and RAC2 were significantly correlated with CKD. The lncRNAs of NOP14-AS1 and HCP5 were potential prognostic biomarkers for predicting the risk of CKD.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31721901      PMCID: PMC6853076          DOI: 10.1590/1414-431X20198333

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Braz J Med Biol Res        ISSN: 0100-879X            Impact factor:   2.590


Introduction

Arising from many heterogeneous disease pathways, chronic kidney disease (CKD) can alter the function and structure of the kidney irreversibly, over months or years. In 2012, according to World Health Organization global health estimates, 864 226 deaths (or 1.5% of deaths worldwide) were attributable to CKD. Thus, the burden of CKD is substantial. The etiology of CKD is very complex, with hypertension and diabetes being the main causes. Moreover, increased risk of developing CKD and more rapidly progressing CKD are reported to be related to worsening blood pressure control. Recently, investigation of people with genetic causes of CKD has been evolving rapidly. Several loci, genetic polymorphisms, and single nucleotide polymorphisms that might contribute to accelerated progression of CKD have been identified with genome-wide association studies (1 –4). During past years, the biological roles of various types of non-coding RNAs (ncRNAs) have been highlighted. Long non-coding RNAs (lncRNAs), a newly discovered class of ncRNAs, were defined as RNA molecules longer than 200 nucleotides in length. There is growing evidence that lncRNAs are involved in various biological processes, including maintenance of pluripotency, nuclear organization, development, translational control, and RNA splicing. A growing number of lncRNAs have been characterized as tumor suppressor genes or oncogenes contributing to cancer development, progression, and metastasis (3,5,6). Nevertheless, not much is known about the roles of lncRNAs for chronic human diseases other than cancer until recently, such as CKD. In this work, CKD patient cohorts and normal controls were included as a discovery cohort to identify putative lncRNA biomarkers. The lncRNA expression profiles of CKD patients were compared with normal controls, and differentially expressed lncRNAs and mRNAs were identified. Co-expression network based on the enriched differentially expressed mRNAs and lncRNAs was constructed using weighted correlation network analysis (WGCNA) to identify important modules related to CKD. A lncRNA-miRNA-mRNA-pathway network based on the hub lncRNAs and mRNAs, related miRNAs, and overlapping pathways was further constructed to reveal putative biomarkers for CKD.

Material and Methods

Microarray data and data preprocessing

The microarray data GSE48944 for CKD was downloaded from the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) Gene Expression Omnibus database (GEO) on May 7, 2018 (7). The testing platform was Affymetrix Human Genome U133A 2.0 (GPL571: HG-U133A_2). GSE48944 included 13 human CKD samples and 12 control (CTRL) samples. Microarray raw data (.CEL files) of the CKD were processed with oligo Version 1.41.1 (http://www.bioconductor.org/packages/release/bioc/html/oligo.html) in R language to achieve an approximate normal distribution (8). Subsequently, the data were standardized using the median normalization and quantile methods.

Screening of differentially expressed mRNAs and lncRNAs

The probe sequences (GPL571) of Affymetrix HG-U133_2 array were downloaded from the Affymetrix website (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/query/acc.cgi?acc=GPL571). Along with information of transcript ID, RefSeq ID, and chromosomal position, the 3909 lncRNAs and 19198 protein coding genes in HUGO Gene Nomenclature Committee (HGNC, http://www.genenames.org/) were used to re-annotate the mRNAs and lncRNAs in the microarray data (9). Limma Version 3.34.0 (https://bioconductor.org/packages/release/bioc/html/limma.html) in R language (R3.4.1) was used to determine the false discovery rate (FDR) and fold changes (FC) of differentially expressed mRNAs and lncRNAs (10). The FDR value <0.05 and |logFC|>0.5 were used as the cut-off criteria. Based on expression profiles of mRNAs and lncRNAs, the pheatmap Version 1.0.8 (https://cran.r-project.org/package=pheatmap) in R language (R3.4.1) was used to determine the metric of Euclidean distance and bilateral hierarchical clustering, and displayed with hierarchical clustering (11 –13). Functional enrichment analysis for lncRNAs was conducted using DAVID Bioinformatics Tool (DAVID 6.8, https://david.ncifcrf.gov/) limited to Gene Ontology (GO) terms and Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) categories to screen the significantly enriched GO functions and KEGG pathways (14,15).

WGCNA analysis to screen specific modules and RNAs

WGCNA, a biology systems method, can be used to construct a scale-free network from gene expression data. WGCNA package Version 1.61 in R (https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/WGCNA/) was used to screen specific modules and RNAs related to CKD (16 –18). The modules were detected using dynamic tree cut algorithm with a minimum module size of 100 and a minimum cut height of 0.95 (P value <0.05). The significantly differentially expressed mRNAs and lncRNAs were mapped to modules in WGCNA. Fold enrichments and P values of significantly differentially expressed mRNAs and lncRNAs in modules were calculated using the hypergeometric test of f(k,N,M,n) = C(k,M) * C(n-k,N-M) / C(n,N) (19). A fold enrichment >1 and P value <0.05 were used as the cut-off criteria.

Network construction of enriched differentially expressed mRNAs and lncRNAs

Pearson’s correlation coefficient (PCC) of the enriched differentially expressed mRNAs and lncRNAs in WGCNA modules was calculated using the cor function in R (http://77.66.12.57/R-help/cor.test.html), and the co-expression network was constructed. Cytoscape 3.6.1 (http://www.cytoscape.org/) was used to visualize the co-expression network of enriched differentially expressed mRNAs and lncRNAs in WGCNA modules (20). GO functional and KEGG pathway analyses for enriched differentially expressed mRNAs and lncRNAs in the co-expression network were searched using the Database for Annotation, Visualization, and Integrated Discovery (DAVID, http://www.david.niaid.nih.gov) software. Three categories of biological process, cellular compartment, and molecular function were included in the GO terms.

Construction of KEGG pathway network related to CKD

KEGG pathways related to CKD were searched with Comparative Toxic Genomics Database 2017 update (CTD, http://ctd.mdibl.org/) using the keyword “Chronic Kidney Disease”. These pathways were compared with KEGG pathways enriched in the co-expression network of differentially expressed mRNAs and lncRNAs, and then the overlapping pathways were obtained. A KEGG pathway network related to CKD was constructed using these overlapping pathways. We searched the related miRNAs using StarBase Version 2.0 database (http://starbase.sysu.edu.cn/), constructed lncRNA-miRNA-mRNA-pathway network by connecting the hubs, and screened the potential prognostic biomarkers of long non-coding RNAs for predicting the risk of CKD (21).

Results

Overview of differential expression analysis (lncRNAs and mRNAs)

Firstly, the microarray raw data were standardized using the median normalization and quantile methods. Boxplots of microarray raw data before and after normalization are shown in Figure 1.
Figure 1.

Boxplot of microarray raw data before (A) and after (B) normalization.

Next, we performed differentially expressed analysis to identify potential lncRNAs associated with CKD. A total of 130 lncRNAs and 12,126 protein-coding genes were obtained after re-annotation, as shown in Table S1. A total of 821 significantly differentially expressed mRNAs and lncRNAs were screened using Limma (http://www.bioconductor.org/packages/release/bioc/html/limma.html), including 205 downregulated and 616 upregulated between CKD and CTRL (Figure 2A and Table S2). The expression level of these significantly differentially expressed mRNAs and lncRNAs are shown in Table S3. Bilateral hierarchical clustering of significantly differentially expressed mRNAs and lncRNAs are shown in Figure 2B. The expression level of RNAs could discriminate CKD and CTRL samples, indicating distinctive features between these samples.
Figure 2.

A, Volcano plot of log2 fold change (FC) – log10 false discovery rate (FDR) test for differentially expressed mRNAs and lncRNAs. Red dotted line indicates FDR <0.05. Green dots indicate differentially expressed mRNAs and lncRNAs. B, Heatmap of hierarchical clustering of differentially expressed lncRNAs and mRNAs.

GO functional and KEGG pathway analyses for 802 differentially expressed coding RNAs indicated that 32 GO functions (15 biological processes, 12 cellular compartments, and 5 molecular functions) and 15 KEGG pathways were enriched. As shown in Table 1 and Figure 3, these differentially expressed coding RNAs were related to GO functions of wound response, immune response, and inflammatory response, as well as KEGG pathways of complement and coagulation cascades (hsa04610), allograft rejection (hsa05330), and cell adhesion molecules (hsa04514), etc.
Table 1.

Enriched GO functions and KEGG pathways of differentially expressed coding RNAs.

CategoryTermCountP value
Biology ProcessGO: 0009611∼response to wounding672.55E-13
GO: 0006955∼immune response772.08E-12
GO: 0006954∼inflammatory response446.85E-10
GO: 0002684∼positive regulation of immune system process361.67E-09
GO: 0006952∼defense response643.54E-09
GO: 0050778∼positive regulation of immune response261.47E-08
GO: 0002252∼immune effector process232.63E-07
GO: 0045087∼innate immune response221.77E-06
GO: 0048584∼positive regulation of response to stimulus295.96E-06
GO: 0042060∼wound healing251.04E-05
GO: 0001775∼cell activation321.33E-05
GO: 0048534∼hemopoietic or lymphoid organ development301.36E-05
GO: 0030097∼hemopoiesis281.70E-05
GO: 0050865∼regulation of cell activation232.39E-05
GO: 0030029∼actin filament-based process282.49E-05
Cellular ComponentGO: 0044459∼plasma membrane part1552.53E-08
GO: 0031093∼platelet alpha granule lumen132.00E-07
GO: 0005615∼extracellular space632.65E-07
GO: 0044421∼extracellular region part803.03E-07
GO: 0060205∼cytoplasmic membrane-bounded vesicle lumen134.71E-07
GO: 0031983∼vesicle lumen137.98E-07
GO: 0031091∼platelet alpha granule141.19E-06
GO: 0042611∼MHC protein complex141.48E-06
GO: 0005886∼plasma membrane2263.93E-06
GO: 0005576∼extracellular region1354.08E-06
GO: 0005887∼integral to plasma membrane895.27E-06
GO: 0031226∼intrinsic to plasma membrane907.08E-06
Molecular FunctionGO: 0004857∼enzyme inhibitor activity351.04E-07
GO: 0003779∼actin binding363.10E-06
GO: 0004866∼endopeptidase inhibitor activity223.18E-06
GO: 0030414∼peptidase inhibitor activity227.56E-06
GO: 0032395∼MHC class II receptor activity81.36E-05
KEGG Pathwayhsa04610: Complement and coagulation cascades182.04E-07
hsa05330: Allograft rejection122.50E-06
hsa04514: Cell adhesion molecules (CAMs)221.69E-05
hsa04612: Antigen processing and presentation150.000189
hsa04810: Regulation of actin cytoskeleton230.004886
hsa04670: Leukocyte transendothelial migration150.00551
hsa04650: Natural killer cell mediated cytotoxicity160.006762
hsa04666: Fc gamma R-mediated phagocytosis120.013475
hsa04662: B cell receptor signaling pathway100.017701
hsa03320: PPAR signaling pathway90.027244
hsa04062: Chemokine signaling pathway180.028853
hsa04540: Gap junction100.043395
hsa04520: Adherens junction90.04559
hsa04142: Lysosome120.046965
hsa04510: Focal adhesion180.048777

GO: Gene Ontology.

Figure 3.

Distribution diagram of enriched Gene Ontology (GO) functions and KEGG pathways of differentially expressed mRNAs and lncRNAs. Orange, red, green, and blue dots indicate KEGG pathway, molecular function, cellular component, and biological process, respectively.

GO: Gene Ontology.

Identification and characterization of CKD-associated modules using WGCNA

The underlying molecular mechanisms of CKD could be explored through an approach of gene co-expression network. It allows us to explore a set of interacting mRNAs and lncRNAs measured by modules or subnetworks that are involved in the complex disease of CKD. The WGCNA R package implements a suite of tools, which can be used for the network construction. A weighted adjacency matrix implemented in WGCNA was used to construct a scale-free network and identify important modules related to CKD. In this work, a step-by-step network construction and module detection method was used, and a selected power (power=12) was determined through a soft-threshold approach implemented in WGCNA, as shown in Figure 4. Co-expression modules were defined by a robust dynamic hierarchical tree and sets of tightly co-regulated genes with the measurement of dissimilarity. The minimum module size of 100 and a minimum cut height of 0.25 were set to ensure a qualified number of genes for the further analysis. Nine co-expression modules were obtained by clustering the highly co-expressed genes in the constructed network (Table 2). With each clustered module showing a different color, they were visualized as shown in Figure 5. Differently expressed mRNAs and lncRNAs were significantly enriched in brown and yellow modules, including 151 and 54 RNAs (containing 7 lncRNAs), respectively. These 205 differently expressed mRNAs and lncRNAs enriched in brown and yellow modules were used for subsequent investigation. The list of these RNAs in brown and yellow modules are provided in Table S4.
Figure 4.

Left panel: power selection map. Right panel: mean connectivity degree of RNA under different power values.

Table 2.

Summary of nine modules in co-expression network.

ColorRNAs (#)CorrelationPcorr DE RNAs (n)Enrichment fold (95% CI)Phyper
Black1710.8320.00033810.0615 (0.00155-0.350)6.75E-06
Blue5190.8630.00093650.101 (0.0325-0.241)1.35E-13
Brown4210.8610.002091513.771 (3.006-4.716)2.20E-16
Green2890.8190.000286170.619 (0.351-1.025)0.526
Grey3550.1290.282220.652 (0.397-1.021)6.34E-02
Pink1220.7240.026310.0862 (0.00216-0.493)3.87E-04
Red2290.8610.00031710.0459 (0.00116-0.261)7.07E-08
Turquoise9030.7940.00102620.722 (0.5354-0.9611)2.46E-02
Yellow2930.8890.0266541.938 (1.389-2.664)9.10E-05

DE: differently expressed.

Figure 5.

Network construction and module identification.

DE: differently expressed.

Network analysis revealed prognostic lncRNA biomarkers associated with CKD progression

To identify potential prognostic lncRNA biomarkers associated with CKD progression, we further constructed a co-expression network based on the enriched differentially expressed mRNAs and lncRNAs in brown and yellow modules. PCC of 197 differentially expressed mRNAs and 7 differentially expressed lncRNAs were calculated (Table S5). As shown in Figure 6, lncRNA-mRNA co-expression network contained 462 lines (250 with negative correlation and 212 with positive correlation) and 204 hubs. Among these 7 lncRNAs, 1 lncRNA was upregulated and 6 lncRNAs were downregulated, while 53 mRNAs were downregulated and 144 mRNAs were upregulated.
Figure 6.

lncRNA-mRNA co-expression network. Green lines represent negative correlations, and pink lines represent positive correlations. Squares indicate lncRNA, and circles indicate mRNA. The node change from green to red indicates that log fold change (FC) changed from negative to positive.

GO functional and KEGG pathway analyses using DAVID for differentially expressed mRNAs indicated 32 GO functions (15 biological processes, 6 cellular compartments, and 11 molecular functions) and 10 KEGG pathways were enriched (Table 3 and Figure 7). The differentially expressed mRNAs in the lncRNA-mRNA co-expression network were related to GO functions of wound response, defense response, immune response, and inflammatory response. Moreover, the enriched KEGG pathways included complement and coagulation cascades (hsa04610), ECM-receptor interaction (hsa04512), cytokine-cytokine receptor interaction (hsa04060), and cell adhesion molecules (hsa04514), etc.
Table 3.

Enriched Gene Ontology (GO) functions and KEGG pathways of mRNAs in the co-expression network.

CategoryTermCountP value
Biology processGO: 0009611∼response to wounding327.40E-14
GO: 0006952∼defense response323.77E-12
GO: 0006954∼inflammatory response221.90E-10
GO: 0006955∼immune response282.73E-08
GO: 0022610∼biological adhesion251.97E-06
GO: 0007155∼cell adhesion251.92E-06
GO: 0002253∼activation of immune response91.38E-05
GO: 0002526∼acute inflammatory response91.87E-05
GO: 0006959∼humoral immune response83.72E-05
GO: 0045087∼innate immune response103.42E-05
GO: 0001775∼cell activation143.19E-05
GO: 0002252∼immune effector process91.74E-04
GO: 0050778∼positive regulation of immune response92.97E-04
GO: 0045321∼leukocyte activation115.51E-04
GO: 0042110∼T cell activation86.86E-04
Cellular componentGO: 0005576∼extracellular region612.57E-11
GO: 0044421∼extracellular region part372.49E-09
GO: 0005615∼extracellular space312.00E-09
GO: 0031012∼extracellular matrix144.48E-04
GO: 0031226∼intrinsic to plasma membrane306.13E-04
GO: 0005887∼integral to plasma membrane299.38E-04
Molecular functionGO: 0001871∼pattern binding122.14E-06
GO: 0030247∼polysaccharide binding122.14E-06
GO: 0004866∼endopeptidase inhibitor activity118.62E-06
GO: 0005539∼glycosaminoglycan binding116.31E-06
GO: 0030414∼peptidase inhibitor activity111.38E-05
GO: 0008201∼heparin binding93.00E-05
GO: 0004857∼enzyme inhibitor activity138.93E-05
GO: 0004867∼serine-type endopeptidase inhibitor activity81.09E-04
GO: 0030246∼carbohydrate binding143.03E-04
GO: 0005509∼calcium ion binding245.12E-04
GO: 0008233∼peptidase activity170.001293
KEGG pathway*hsa04610: Complement and coagulation cascades88.31E-06
*hsa04510: Focal adhesion100.000368
hsa04512: ECM-receptor interaction60.000945
*hsa04060: Cytokine-cytokine receptor interaction90.004923
hsa04514: Cell adhesion molecules (CAMs)50.014839
*hsa04144: Endocytosis60.015668
hsa04310: Wnt signaling pathway50.020687
*hsa04062: Chemokine signaling pathway50.033087
*hsa04666: Fc gamma R-mediated phagocytosis30.043681
*hsa04620: Toll-like receptor signaling pathway30.046832
Figure 7.

Enriched Gene Ontology functions (A) and KEGG pathways (B) of differentially expressed mRNAs and lncRNAs in the co-expression network. FDR: false discovery rate.

KEGG pathway network further revealed the prognostic lncRNA biomarkers related to CKD

Using the keyword “Chronic Kidney Disease”, 175 KEGG pathways related to CKD were searched with CTD, as shown in Table S6. These pathways were compared with KEGG enriched pathways in the co-expression network of differentially expressed mRNAs and lncRNAs, and 7 overlapping pathways were obtained (Table 3, indicated with *). A lncRNA-mRNA-pathway network related to CKD was constructed using these overlapping pathways, as shown in Figure 8A. The miRNAs related to 7 lncRNAs in the network were searched using StarBase Version 2.0 database, and 24 lncRNA-miRNA linking relations were found, involving two lncRNAs of HCP5 and NOP14-AS1 (Table S7). Next, a lncRNA-miRNA-mRNA-pathway network was constructed by connecting the has-miR-29a/b/c, HCP5, and 4 KEGG pathways. As shown in Figure 8B, the four genes of CCND2, COL3A1, COL4A1, and RAC2, positively related with HCP5, were found to participate in four KEGG pathways directly related to CKD. As shown in Figure 9, CCND2, COL3A1, COL4A1, RAC2, and HCP5 were significantly upregulated in GSE48944 and GSE47184 (besides RAC2 in GSE47184).
Figure 8.

A lncRNA-mRNA-pathway network (A) and a lncRNA-miRNA-mRNA-pathway network (B) related to chronic kidney disease (CKD). Green lines represent negative correlations; pink lines represent positive correlations; black lines represent gene connection with KEGG pathways. Squares indicate lncRNA; circles indicate mRNA; yellow circles indicate miRNA; triangles indicate pathways. The node change from green to pink indicates that log fold change changed from negative to positive.

Figure 9.

Expression level of CCND2, COL3A1, COL4A1, RAC2, and HCP5 in GSE48944 and GSE47184 in controls and in chronic kidney disease (CKD) patients. *P<0.05; **P<0.01; ***P<0.005. x indicates not significant. Statistical analyses were performed with the t-test.

Discussion

The results of this study indicated that genes with similar functions within modules could contribute to the risk of CKD in a co-expression manner, and the modules with different functions could be regulated synergistically. In order to identify potential critical lncRNAs and genes associated with CKD, we focused our attention on hub lncRNAs and genes in the lncRNA-miRNA-mRNA-pathway network. Downregulated has-miR-29a/b/c was reported to be related to CKD directly (22). NOP14-AS1 (NOP14 antisense RNA 1) is affiliated with the non-coding RNA class. Diseases associated with NOP14-AS1 include astrocytoma. Previous research identified that NOP14-AS1 was strongly regulated by DNA damaging agents and significantly negatively correlated with its sense gene NOP14 in a p53-dependent manner. Hence, sense-antisense pair of NOP14-AS1/NOP14 might be involved in the progression of CKD upon DNA damage induction. The long non-coding RNA-HLA complex P5 (HCP5) has been found to be overexpressed in follicular thyroid carcinoma, which functions as a competing endogenous RNA and acts as a sponge for several miRNAs (23). The lncRNA-miRNA-mRNA-pathway network constructed indicated that HCP5 might be regulatory genes associated with the progression of CKD via the genes of CCND2, COL3A1, COL4A1, and RAC2. The CCND2 gene encodes a protein G1/S-specific cyclin-D2 in humans, which belongs to the highly conserved cyclin family. Cyclins function as regulators of cyclin-dependent kinases. High level expression of CCND2 gene was observed in ovarian and testicular tumors (24). COL3A1 gene encodes a protein of collagen alpha-1(III) chain, a precursor to collagen III, which is found in extensible connective tissues, frequently in association with type I collagen (25). The COL4A1 gene contains one of 27 SNPs associated with increased risk of coronary artery disease (26). RAC2 gene encodes a small (∼21 kDa) signaling G protein, a member of the Rac subfamily of the Rho family of GTPases, which has been shown to interact with nitric oxide synthase 2A (27). Thus, these are important genes for CKD. In summary, this work revealed that lncRNA of NOP14-AS1 and HCP5 might be potential genetic biomarkers for the progression of CKD. They may function via the genes of CCND2, COL3A1, COL4A1, and RAC2, and the pathways of complement and coagulation cascades (hsa04610), ECM-receptor interaction (hsa04512), cytokine-cytokine receptor interaction (hsa04060), and cell adhesion molecules (hsa04514), etc. Although a comprehensive analysis was performed, there were a number of limitations in the work. Functional validation was not done for the hub lncRNAs and mRNAs obtained. Further investigations are required with substantial experiments. Nevertheless, this work provides novel insights into the occurrence and progression of CKD.

Supplementary Material

Click here to view [xls].
  27 in total

1.  Effect of normalization on significance testing for oligonucleotide microarrays.

Authors:  Rudolph S Parrish; Horace J Spencer
Journal:  J Biopharm Stat       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 1.051

2.  Systematic and integrative analysis of large gene lists using DAVID bioinformatics resources.

Authors:  Da Wei Huang; Brad T Sherman; Richard A Lempicki
Journal:  Nat Protoc       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 13.491

3.  Specific association of nitric oxide synthase-2 with Rac isoforms in activated murine macrophages.

Authors:  T Kuncewicz; P Balakrishnan; M B Snuggs; B C Kone
Journal:  Am J Physiol Renal Physiol       Date:  2001-08

4.  CCND2 rearrangements are the most frequent genetic events in cyclin D1(-) mantle cell lymphoma.

Authors:  Itziar Salaverria; Cristina Royo; Alejandra Carvajal-Cuenca; Guillem Clot; Alba Navarro; Alejandra Valera; Joo Y Song; Renata Woroniecka; Grzegorz Rymkiewicz; Wolfram Klapper; Elena M Hartmann; Pierre Sujobert; Iwona Wlodarska; Judith A Ferry; Philippe Gaulard; German Ott; Andreas Rosenwald; Armando Lopez-Guillermo; Leticia Quintanilla-Martinez; Nancy L Harris; Elaine S Jaffe; Reiner Siebert; Elias Campo; Sílvia Beà
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2012-12-18       Impact factor: 22.113

5.  Functional organization of the transcriptome in human brain.

Authors:  Michael C Oldham; Genevieve Konopka; Kazuya Iwamoto; Peter Langfelder; Tadafumi Kato; Steve Horvath; Daniel H Geschwind
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2008-10-12       Impact factor: 24.884

6.  Genetic risk, coronary heart disease events, and the clinical benefit of statin therapy: an analysis of primary and secondary prevention trials.

Authors:  J L Mega; N O Stitziel; S Kathiresan; M S Sabatine; J G Smith; D I Chasman; M Caulfield; J J Devlin; F Nordio; C Hyde; C P Cannon; F Sacks; N Poulter; P Sever; P M Ridker; E Braunwald; O Melander
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2015-03-04       Impact factor: 79.321

7.  Large-scale prediction of long non-coding RNA functions in a coding-non-coding gene co-expression network.

Authors:  Qi Liao; Changning Liu; Xiongying Yuan; Shuli Kang; Ruoyu Miao; Hui Xiao; Guoguang Zhao; Haitao Luo; Dechao Bu; Haitao Zhao; Geir Skogerbø; Zhongdao Wu; Yi Zhao
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2011-01-18       Impact factor: 16.971

Review 8.  The Clinical Relevance of Long Non-Coding RNAs in Cancer.

Authors:  Andreia Silva; Marc Bullock; George Calin
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2015-10-27       Impact factor: 6.639

9.  Cytosine methylation changes in enhancer regions of core pro-fibrotic genes characterize kidney fibrosis development.

Authors:  Yi-An Ko; Davoud Mohtat; Masako Suzuki; Ae Seo Deok Park; Maria Concepcion Izquierdo; Sang Youb Han; Hyun Mi Kang; Han Si; Thomas Hostetter; James M Pullman; Melissa Fazzari; Amit Verma; Deyou Zheng; John M Greally; Katalin Susztak
Journal:  Genome Biol       Date:  2013       Impact factor: 13.583

10.  RNA-seq analyses of multiple meristems of soybean: novel and alternative transcripts, evolutionary and functional implications.

Authors:  Lei Wang; Chenlong Cao; Qibin Ma; Qiaoying Zeng; Haifeng Wang; Zhihao Cheng; Genfeng Zhu; Ji Qi; Hong Ma; Hai Nian; Yingxiang Wang
Journal:  BMC Plant Biol       Date:  2014-06-17       Impact factor: 4.215

View more
  7 in total

Review 1.  Transforming Growth Factor-β and Long Non-coding RNA in Renal Inflammation and Fibrosis.

Authors:  Yue-Yu Gu; Jing-Yun Dou; Xiao-Ru Huang; Xu-Sheng Liu; Hui-Yao Lan
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2021-05-13       Impact factor: 4.566

2.  Comprehensive Molecular and Cellular Characterization of Acute Kidney Injury Progression to Renal Fibrosis.

Authors:  Renyan Wu; Jiawei Li; Guowei Tu; Ying Su; Xuepeng Zhang; Zhe Luo; Ruiming Rong; Yi Zhang
Journal:  Front Immunol       Date:  2021-10-29       Impact factor: 7.561

3.  LncRNA HCP5 enhances the proliferation and migration of cervical cancer via miR-216a-5p/CDC42 axis.

Authors:  Xiaomin Li; Bingxin Chen; Anni Huang; Ci Ren; Liming Wang; Tong Zhu; Jinfeng Xiong; Wencheng Ding; Hui Wang
Journal:  J Cancer       Date:  2022-03-21       Impact factor: 4.207

Review 4.  Non-Coding RNAs in Kidney Diseases: The Long and Short of Them.

Authors:  Juan Antonio Moreno; Eya Hamza; Melania Guerrero-Hue; Sandra Rayego-Mateos; Cristina García-Caballero; Mercedes Vallejo-Mudarra; Laurent Metzinger; Valérie Metzinger-Le Meuth
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2021-06-04       Impact factor: 5.923

5.  LncRNA PVT1 Suppresses the Progression of Renal Fibrosis via Inactivation of TGF-β Signaling Pathway.

Authors:  Lu Cao; Peng Qin; Jianjiang Zhang; Huiju Qiao; Peipei Shi; Huali Huo
Journal:  Drug Des Devel Ther       Date:  2020-08-26       Impact factor: 4.162

6.  LncRNA MALAT1-deficiency restrains lipopolysaccharide (LPS)-induced pyroptotic cell death and inflammation in HK-2 cells by releasing microRNA-135b-5p.

Authors:  Jie Huang; Chen Xu
Journal:  Ren Fail       Date:  2021-12       Impact factor: 2.606

7.  LncRNA HCP5 knockdown inhibits high glucose-induced excessive proliferation, fibrosis and inflammation of human glomerular mesangial cells by regulating the miR-93-5p/HMGA2 axis.

Authors:  Xuan Wang; Yan Liu; Jian Rong; Kai Wang
Journal:  BMC Endocr Disord       Date:  2021-06-29       Impact factor: 2.763

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.