Literature DB >> 31721182

Social connectedness and mortality after prostate cancer diagnosis: A prospective cohort study.

Zimu Wu1, Nga H Nguyen1, Dawei Wang1, Brigid M Lynch1,2,3, Allison M Hodge1,2, Julie K Bassett1, Victoria M White4,5, Ron Borland6, Dallas R English1,2, Roger L Milne1,2,7, Graham G Giles1,2,7, Pierre-Antoine Dugué1,2,7.   

Abstract

Men with prostate cancer experience side effects for which a supportive social environment may be beneficial. We examined the association between four measures of social connectedness and mortality after a prostate cancer diagnosis. Male participants in the Melbourne Collaborative Cohort Study in 1990-1994, who developed incident prostate cancer and attended follow-up in 2003-2007, were eligible for the study. Information on social connectedness, collected at follow-up, included (i) living arrangement; (ii) frequency of visits to friends/relatives and (iii) from friends/relatives; (iv) weekly hours of social activities. A total of 1,421 prostate cancer cases was observed (338 all-cause deaths, 113 from prostate cancer), including 867 after follow-up (150 all-cause deaths, 55 from prostate cancer) and 554 before follow-up (188 all-cause deaths, 58 from prostate cancer). Cox models stratified by tumour Gleason score and stage, and sequentially adjusted for socioeconomic, health- and lifestyle-related confounders, were used to calculate hazard ratios (HR) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) for the association between social connectedness and all-cause mortality after prostate cancer. Men who reported living alone before diagnosis had higher overall mortality (HR = 1.6, 95% CI: 1.0-2.5), after adjustment for socioeconomic, health and lifestyle confounders. Lower mortality was observed for men with more social activities (p-trend = 0.07), but not in comprehensively adjusted models. Consistent with these findings, men living alone after prostate cancer diagnosis had higher mortality (HR = 1.3, 95% CI: 0.9-1.9). Lower mortality was observed with increasing socializing hours in the age-adjusted model (p-trend = 0.06) but not after more comprehensive adjustment. Our findings suggest that living with someone, but not other aspects of social connectedness, may be associated with decreased mortality for men with prostate cancer.
© 2019 UICC.

Entities:  

Keywords:  cohort study; mortality; overall survival; prostate cancer; psychosocial factors; social connectedness; social interactions; social networks; social support

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31721182     DOI: 10.1002/ijc.32786

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Cancer        ISSN: 0020-7136            Impact factor:   7.396


  2 in total

1.  Psychosocial and Biological Outcomes of Immersive, Mindfulness-Based Treks in Nature for Groups of Young Adults and Caregivers Affected by Cancer: Results from a Single Arm Program Evaluation from 2016-2021.

Authors:  David Victorson; Gretchen Doninger; Scott Victorson; Gwen Victorson; Lars Hall; Carly Maletich; Bradley R Corr; Kathy Scortino; Zachary Burns; Lori Allen; Ian Rosa; Kelley Quirk; Adekunle Adegbemi; Johanna Strokoff; Kile Zuidema; Kelle Sajdak; Todd Mckibben; Angie Roberts; Thomas W McDade; Amanda Boes; Katie McAlinden; Karen Arredondo; Christina Sauer; Kristin Smith; John M Salsman
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-11-30       Impact factor: 3.390

2.  Living alone as a risk factor for cancer incidence, case-fatality and all-cause mortality: A nationwide registry study.

Authors:  Marko Elovainio; Sonja Lumme; Martti Arffman; Kristiina Manderbacka; Eero Pukkala; Christian Hakulinen
Journal:  SSM Popul Health       Date:  2021-06-11
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.