Carlos Alberto Nigro1, Eduardo Borsini2, Eduardo Dibur1, Luis Larrateguy3, Alexis Cazaux4, Carlos Elias5, Marcelino de la Vega6, Cecilia Berrozpe7, Silvana Maggi8, Sofía Grandval9, Hugo Cambursano4, Daniela Visentini10, Magali Blanco2, Glenda Ernst2, Ignacio Bledel11,12,13, Facundo Nogueira14. 1. Sleep Lab, Pneumonology, Hospital Alemán, Ciudad Autónoma de Buenos Aires, Argentina. 2. Sleep Lab, Pneumonology, Hospital Británico, Ciudad Autónoma de Buenos Aires, Argentina. 3. Centro Privado de Medicina Respiratoria, Paraná, Argentina. 4. Centro Dr. Lázaro Langer, Córdoba, Argentina. 5. Instituto Médico Insares, Mendoza, Argentina. 6. Hospital Privado Santa Clara de Asis, Salta, Argentina. 7. Sleep Lab, FLENI, Ciudad Autónoma de Buenos Aires, Argentina. 8. Sleep Lab, CEMIC, Ciudad Autónoma de Buenos Aires, Argentina. 9. Sanatorio San Lucas, San Isidro, Buenos Aires, Argentina. 10. Hospital Cetrángolo, Vicente López, Buenos Aires, Argentina. 11. Sleep Lab, Pneumonology, Hospital Alemán, Ciudad Autónoma de Buenos Aires, Argentina. nachobledell@gmail.com. 12. Sleep Lab, Pneumonology, Hospital Británico, Ciudad Autónoma de Buenos Aires, Argentina. nachobledell@gmail.com. 13. , Ciudad Auónoma de Buenos Aires, Argentina. nachobledell@gmail.com. 14. Sleep Lab, Hospital de Clínicas, Ciudad Autónoma de Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the performance of clinical criteria (CC) for diagnosis and initiation of empirical treatment with continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) in patients with suspected obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) compared with the treatment decision based on sleep studies (polysomnography or respiratory polygraphy), guidelines, and experience of participating physicians. METHODS: This was a simulated intention-to-treat study in a retrospective (G1) and prospective (G2) cohort. Four observers (two per group) called CC1 and CC2 reviewed the sleep questionnaires and indicated CPAP if the patients presented snoring, frequent apneas (≥ 3-4/week), body mass index (BMI) > 25 kg/m2, sleepiness (Epworth > 11), or tiredness (at least 3-4 times per week) and some comorbidity (hypertension, coronary/cerebrovascular event, diabetes). Ten independent observers formed two groups of five (FD1 and FD2) and were blinded to each other's opinion. These observers in FD1 and FD2 decided CPAP treatment based on guidelines of the Spanish Society of Pulmonology and Thoracic Surgery (SEPAR) or guidelines of the American Academy of Sleep Medicine (AASM) and factored in their own opinion. Sensitivity (S), specificity (Sp), and positive/negative likelihood ratios (LR+/-) were calculated with the test method: CC1/2, and the reference method: majority decision of FD1/2. RESULTS: A total of 653 patients (264 women, 40%) were studied. Median age was 54 years, BMI 28 kg/m2, and apnea hypopnea index (AHI) 16.5 events/h. S ranged from 21 to 25% (p 0.60), Sp 96.1 to 97.6% (p 0.39), and LR+ of clinical criteria 6.4 to 8.9 (p 0.52). CONCLUSION: CPAP indication without a previous sleep study showed a low sensitivity (≅ 22%) but a specificity greater than 95% in patients with high pretest probability for OSA (snoring, report of frequent apneas, BMI > 25 kg/m2 and sleepiness or tiredness plus comorbidity).
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the performance of clinical criteria (CC) for diagnosis and initiation of empirical treatment with continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) in patients with suspected obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) compared with the treatment decision based on sleep studies (polysomnography or respiratory polygraphy), guidelines, and experience of participating physicians. METHODS: This was a simulated intention-to-treat study in a retrospective (G1) and prospective (G2) cohort. Four observers (two per group) called CC1 and CC2 reviewed the sleep questionnaires and indicated CPAP if the patients presented snoring, frequent apneas (≥ 3-4/week), body mass index (BMI) > 25 kg/m2, sleepiness (Epworth > 11), or tiredness (at least 3-4 times per week) and some comorbidity (hypertension, coronary/cerebrovascular event, diabetes). Ten independent observers formed two groups of five (FD1 and FD2) and were blinded to each other's opinion. These observers in FD1 and FD2 decided CPAP treatment based on guidelines of the Spanish Society of Pulmonology and Thoracic Surgery (SEPAR) or guidelines of the American Academy of Sleep Medicine (AASM) and factored in their own opinion. Sensitivity (S), specificity (Sp), and positive/negative likelihood ratios (LR+/-) were calculated with the test method: CC1/2, and the reference method: majority decision of FD1/2. RESULTS: A total of 653 patients (264 women, 40%) were studied. Median age was 54 years, BMI 28 kg/m2, and apnea hypopnea index (AHI) 16.5 events/h. S ranged from 21 to 25% (p 0.60), Sp 96.1 to 97.6% (p 0.39), and LR+ of clinical criteria 6.4 to 8.9 (p 0.52). CONCLUSION: CPAP indication without a previous sleep study showed a low sensitivity (≅ 22%) but a specificity greater than 95% in patients with high pretest probability for OSA (snoring, report of frequent apneas, BMI > 25 kg/m2 and sleepiness or tiredness plus comorbidity).