Literature DB >> 31720840

A review on recent advancements in electrochemical biosensing using carbonaceous nanomaterials.

Alireza Sanati1,2, Mahsa Jalali2, Keyvan Raeissi1, Fathallah Karimzadeh1, Mahshid Kharaziha1, Sahar Sadat Mahshid3, Sara Mahshid4.   

Abstract

This review, with 201 references, describes the recent advancement in the application of carbonaceous nanomaterials as highly conductive platforms in electrochemical biosensing. The electrochemical biosensing is described in introduction by classifying biosensors into catalytic-based and affinity-based biosensors and statistically demonstrates the most recent published works in each category. The introduction is followed by sections on electrochemical biosensors configurations and common carbonaceous nanomaterials applied in electrochemical biosensing, including graphene and its derivatives, carbon nanotubes, mesoporous carbon, carbon nanofibers and carbon nanospheres. In the following sections, carbonaceous catalytic-based and affinity-based biosensors are discussed in detail. In the category of catalytic-based biosensors, a comparison between enzymatic biosensors and non-enzymatic electrochemical sensors is carried out. Regarding the affinity-based biosensors, scholarly articles related to biological elements such as antibodies, deoxyribonucleic acids (DNAs) and aptamers are discussed in separate sections. The last section discusses recent advancements in carbonaceous screen-printed electrodes as a growing field in electrochemical biosensing. Tables are presented that give an overview on the diversity of analytes, type of materials and the sensors performance. Ultimately, general considerations, challenges and future perspectives in this field of science are discussed. Recent findings suggest that interests towards 2D nanostructured electrodes based on graphene and its derivatives are still growing in the field of electrochemical biosensing. That is because of their exceptional electrical conductivity, active surface area and more convenient production methods compared to carbon nanotubes. Graphical abstract Schematic representation of carbonaceous nanomaterials used in electrochemical biosensing. The content is classified into non-enzymatic sensors and affinity/ catalytic biosensors. Recent publications are tabulated and compared, considering materials, target, limit of detection and linear range of detection.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Aptasensors; Carbon nanotubes; Catalytic biosensors; DNA based biosensors; Electrochemical biosensors; Enzymes; Graphene; Immunosensors

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31720840     DOI: 10.1007/s00604-019-3854-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mikrochim Acta        ISSN: 0026-3672            Impact factor:   5.833


  130 in total

1.  Electric field effect in atomically thin carbon films.

Authors:  K S Novoselov; A K Geim; S V Morozov; D Jiang; Y Zhang; S V Dubonos; I V Grigorieva; A A Firsov
Journal:  Science       Date:  2004-10-22       Impact factor: 47.728

2.  Mesoporous carbon materials: synthesis and modification.

Authors:  Chengdu Liang; Zuojiang Li; Sheng Dai
Journal:  Angew Chem Int Ed Engl       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 15.336

3.  Aptamers as a replacement for antibodies in enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay.

Authors:  Saw Yi Toh; Marimuthu Citartan; Subash C B Gopinath; Thean-Hock Tang
Journal:  Biosens Bioelectron       Date:  2014-09-16       Impact factor: 10.618

4.  A sensitive impedimetric DNA biosensor for the determination of the HIV gene based on graphene-Nafion composite film.

Authors:  Qiaojuan Gong; Yongdong Wang; Haiying Yang
Journal:  Biosens Bioelectron       Date:  2016-02-17       Impact factor: 10.618

5.  Hierarchical oxygen-implanted MoS2 nanoparticle decorated graphene for the non-enzymatic electrochemical sensing of hydrogen peroxide in alkaline media.

Authors:  Yudong Xue; Govindhan Maduraiveeran; Mingyong Wang; Shili Zheng; Yi Zhang; Wei Jin
Journal:  Talanta       Date:  2017-08-19       Impact factor: 6.057

6.  Mechanistic Challenges and Advantages of Biosensor Miniaturization into the Nanoscale.

Authors:  Leyla Soleymani; Feng Li
Journal:  ACS Sens       Date:  2017-04-03       Impact factor: 7.711

7.  Acetylene-sourced CVD-synthesised catalytically active graphene for electrochemical biosensing.

Authors:  Adeniyi Olugbenga Osikoya; Onur Parlak; N Arul Murugan; Ezekiel Dixon Dikio; Harry Moloto; Lokman Uzun; Anthony Pf Turner; Ashutosh Tiwari
Journal:  Biosens Bioelectron       Date:  2016-03-25       Impact factor: 10.618

8.  A sensitive sandwich-type immunosensor for the detection of galectin-3 based on N-GNRs-Fe-MOFs@AuNPs nanocomposites and a novel AuPt-methylene blue nanorod.

Authors:  Zhiyong Tang; Junlin He; Jun Chen; Yazhen Niu; Yilin Zhao; Yuchan Zhang; Chao Yu
Journal:  Biosens Bioelectron       Date:  2017-10-16       Impact factor: 10.618

9.  An electrochemical immunosensor for the prostate specific antigen based on the use of reduced graphene oxide decorated with gold nanoparticles.

Authors:  Parnaz Assari; Amir Abbas Rafati; Azizallah Feizollahi; Roghayeh Asadpour Joghani
Journal:  Mikrochim Acta       Date:  2019-06-29       Impact factor: 5.833

Review 10.  Electrochemical biosensors and nanobiosensors.

Authors:  Jules L Hammond; Nello Formisano; Pedro Estrela; Sandro Carrara; Jan Tkac
Journal:  Essays Biochem       Date:  2016-06-30       Impact factor: 8.000

View more
  21 in total

Review 1.  Field-Effect Transistor-Based Biosensors for Environmental and Agricultural Monitoring.

Authors:  Giulia Elli; Saleh Hamed; Mattia Petrelli; Pietro Ibba; Manuela Ciocca; Paolo Lugli; Luisa Petti
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2022-05-31       Impact factor: 3.847

Review 2.  Biosensors-Recent Advances and Future Challenges in Electrode Materials.

Authors:  Fernando Otero; Edmond Magner
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2020-06-23       Impact factor: 3.576

Review 3.  Paper-Based Screen-Printed Electrodes: A New Generation of Low-Cost Electroanalytical Platforms.

Authors:  Estefanía Costa-Rama; María Teresa Fernández-Abedul
Journal:  Biosensors (Basel)       Date:  2021-02-16

Review 4.  Laccase and Tyrosinase Biosensors Used in the Determination of Hydroxycinnamic Acids.

Authors:  Alexandra Virginia Bounegru; Constantin Apetrei
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2021-05-01       Impact factor: 5.923

Review 5.  Recent developments in carbon-based two-dimensional materials: synthesis and modification aspects for electrochemical sensors.

Authors:  Eva-Maria Kirchner; Thomas Hirsch
Journal:  Mikrochim Acta       Date:  2020-07-12       Impact factor: 5.833

6.  An AgNP-deposited commercial electrochemistry test strip as a platform for urea detection.

Authors:  Juanjuan Liu; Roozbeh Siavash Moakhar; Ayyappasamy Sudalaiyadum Perumal; Horia Nicolae Roman; Sara Mahshid; Sebastian Wachsmann-Hogiu
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-06-12       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 7.  Printed Electrochemical Biosensors: Opportunities and Metrological Challenges.

Authors:  Emilio Sardini; Mauro Serpelloni; Sarah Tonello
Journal:  Biosensors (Basel)       Date:  2020-11-04

Review 8.  Nanobiosensors for Non-Amyloidbeta-Tau Biomarkers as Advanced Reporters of Alzheimer's Disease.

Authors:  Le Minh Tu Phan; Thi Xoan Hoang; Thuy Anh Thu Vo; Jae Young Kim; Sang-Myung Lee; Won Woo Cho; Young Hyo Kim; Seong Hye Choi; Sungbo Cho
Journal:  Diagnostics (Basel)       Date:  2020-11-08

Review 9.  Screen-Printed Electrode-Based Sensors for Food Spoilage Control: Bacteria and Biogenic Amines Detection.

Authors:  Ricarda Torre; Estefanía Costa-Rama; Henri P A Nouws; Cristina Delerue-Matos
Journal:  Biosensors (Basel)       Date:  2020-09-30

Review 10.  Towards wearable and implantable continuous drug monitoring: A review.

Authors:  Sumin Bian; Bowen Zhu; Guoguang Rong; Mohamad Sawan
Journal:  J Pharm Anal       Date:  2020-08-15
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.