| Literature DB >> 31720484 |
Yogendra Rathore1, Dinesh Ramchandani2, R K Pandey3.
Abstract
The present research investigates raw oil (Jatropha and coconut oil Fuel), which lies in the edible and non-edible vegetable oils category. We have a set opinion to be taken as potential alternative fuels for C.I. engines and are choosing to search out their quality being employed as a future fuel. The most effective distinction between these two varieties of oils and diesel fuel is viscosity. The blends of the above oils prepared along with pure diesel. Each oil was separately blended in variable proportion (20%-50%) with pure diesel. We have experimented to monitor and analyze the performance of pure diesel fuel against various blends (B20 to B50) of Jatropha-biodiesel & Coconut-biodiesel at a fixed compression ratio i.e. eighteen. The performance limits that were under study and compared are the variation of brake specific fuel consumption & brake thermal efficiency with various loads for many fuel blends.Entities:
Keywords: BSFC and BTE; Biodiesel; Diesel engine; Energy; Engine performance; Environmental pollution; Environmental science; Mechanical engineering
Year: 2019 PMID: 31720484 PMCID: PMC6838942 DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2019.e02717
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Heliyon ISSN: 2405-8440
Property of diesel, Jatropha biodiesel blends and coconut biodiesel blends.
| Properties | Diesel | Jatropha oil blends | Coconut oil blends | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| B20 | B30 | B40 | B50 | B20 | B30 | B40 | B50 | ||
| Density (Kg/m3) | 849 | 853 | 857 | 859 | 864 | 835.7 | 838.5 | 841.7 | 845.8 |
| Kinematic Viscosity | 4.7 | 4.83 | 4.95 | 5.07 | 5.2 | 3.31 | 3.49 | 3.68 | 3.74 |
| (mm2/sec) | |||||||||
| Calorific Value (KJ/Kg) | 43210 | 42147 | 41626 | 41116 | 40833 | 48224 | 47454 | 46952 | 43842 |
Fig. 1Variation of BSFC with Engine Load for B20 at Constant Speed 1500 rpm & CR 18.
Fig. 2Variation of BSFC with Engine Load for B30 at Constant Speed 1500 rpm & CR 18.
Fig. 3Variation of BSFC with Engine Load for B40 at Constant Speed 1500 rpm & CR 18.
Fig. 4Variation of BSFC with Engine Load for B50 at Constant Speed 1500 rpm & CR 18.
Fig. 5Variation of BTE with Engine Load for B20 at Constant Speed 1500 rpm & CR 18.
Fig. 6Variation of BTE with Engine Load for B30 at Constant Speed 1500 rpm & CR 18.
Fig. 7Variation of BTE with Engine Load for B40 at Constant Speed 1500 rpm & CR 18.
Fig. 8Variation of BTE with Engine Load for B50 at Constant Speed 1500 rpm & CR 18.