| Literature DB >> 31719785 |
Palas Samanta1,2, Rituparna Das1, Sandipan Pal3, Aloke Kumar Mukherjee4, Tarakeshwar Senapati5, Debraj Kole1, Apurba Ratan Ghosh1.
Abstract
The present study was designed to assess the adverse effects of the agrochemical Almix on comparative basis in gill, liver and kidney of Heteropneustes fossilis through histological and ultrastructural observations under field (8 g/acre) and laboratory (66.67 mg/L) conditions. Exposure duration of both experiments was 30 days. Gill showed atrophy in secondary lamellae, hypertrophied gill epithelium, damage in chloride and pillar cells, and detachment of chloride cells from gill epithelium under laboratory condition, but hypertrophy in gill epithelium and fusion in secondary lamellae were seen under field condition. In gill, scanning electron microscopy (SEM) showed fragmentation in microridges, hyper-secretion of mucus and loss of normal array in microridges, while transmission electron microscopy (TEM) displayed dilated mitochondria and rough endoplasmic reticulum (RER), abnormal sized vacuolation in chloride cells under laboratory condition. In liver, hypertrophied and pyknotic nuclei, disarrangement of hepatic cords, and cytoplasmic vacuolation were prominent under laboratory study but in field condition the liver showed little alterations. TEM study showed severe degeneration in RER and mitochondria and cytoplasmic vacuolation under laboratory condition but dilated mitochondria were prominent in field observation. Kidney showed severe nephropathic effects including degenerative changes in proximal and distal convolute tubule, damage in glomerulus under light microscopy, while deformity in nucleus, fragmentation in RER, severe vacuolation and necrosis in kidney were prominent under TEM study. The results clearly demonstrated that responses were more prominent in laboratory than field study. Thus the responses displayed by different tissues of concerned fish species exposed to Almix could be considered as indications of herbicide toxicity in aquatic ecosystem.Entities:
Keywords: Almix; Heteropneustes fossilis; scanning electron microscopy; transmission electron microscopy
Year: 2019 PMID: 31719785 PMCID: PMC6829682 DOI: 10.2478/intox-2018-0010
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Interdiscip Toxicol ISSN: 1337-6853
Figure 1Experimental design of the present study.
Figure 2Histopathological photomicrographs of gill of H. fossilis under control condition (C), Almix treated laboratory condition (AL), Almix treated field condition (AF). 2.1 Showing normal structure of primary gill lamellae (PGL) and secondary (SGL) lamella under light microscopy (C×400). 2.2 Showing atrophy and hypertrophy of gill epithelium and SGL (arrow), damage in chloride (oval) and pillar cells (broken arrow) under light microscopy (AL×400). 2.3 Showing hyperplasia (arrow) and partial fusion of SGL (white arrow) under light microscopy (AF×1000). 2.4 Scanning electron microscopy showing normal arrangement of gill rackers (GR) with primary gill lamellae (PGL) and stratified epithelial cells (SEC) on the PGL (C×150). 2.5 Gill epithelium showing fragmentation of MR (oval) and loss of MR in SEC (arrow) under scanning electron microscopy (AL×6000). 2.6 Damage in MR (arrow) under SEM (AF×5000). 2.7 Gill epithelial cell under transmission electron microscopy showing normal chloride cell (CC), pavement cells (PC) with prominent mitochondria (M) (C×2550). 2.8 A double-layered nucleus (oval) and vacuolation in the chloride cells (broken arrow) under TEM (AL×7000). 2.9 Showing vacuolation (broken arrow) only under transmission electron microscopy (AF×2550).
Semi-quantitative assessment of frequency of pathological lesions in gill, liver and kidney of H. fossilis under laboratory and field conditions.
| Pathological Lesion | Control | Laboratory condition | Field condition |
|---|---|---|---|
| Histopathological | |||
| Proliferated gill epithelium | – | ++ | + |
| Hypertrophy of the gill epithelium | – | +++ | + |
| Hyperplasia of the gill epithelium | – | +++ | + |
| Scanning electron microscopic | |||
| Damage of microridge structures | – | + | – |
| Disappearance of normal array of microridges | – | + | – |
| Mucus secretion | – | ++ | – |
| Distortion of stratified epithelial cells | – | ++ | + |
| Swelling of stratified epithelial cells | – | + | + |
| Necrosis | – | ++ | + |
| Transmission electron microscopic | |||
| Chloride cell damage | – | +++ | – |
| Dilated mitochondria | – | + | ++ |
| Mitochondrial degeneration | – | + | – |
| Cytoplasmic vacuolation | – | + | – |
| Nuclear distortion | – | ++ | + |
| Histopathological | |||
| Disoriented hepatic cord | – | ++ | ++ |
| Hypertrophy of hepatocytes | + | +++ | ++ |
| Degeneration of hepatocytes | – | ++ | + |
| Nuclear hypertrophy | + | +++ | ++ |
| Cytoplasmic vacuolation | – | +++ | ++ |
| Pyknotic nucleus | – | + | – |
| Detachment of hepatopancreatic acinar cells from hepatocytes | – | +++ | ++ |
| Deformed hepatopancreas | – | ++ | – |
| Loss of zymogen granules | – | ++ | – |
| Transmission electron microscopic | |||
| Cytoplasmic vacuolation | – | +++ | + |
| Loss of rough endoplasmic reticulum | – | + | – |
| Loss of glycogen granules | – | ++ | +++ |
| Dilated mitochondria | – | + | ++ |
| Histopathological | |||
| Shrinkage of glomerulus | – | ++ | + |
| Lipid vacuoles in epithelial cells | – | ++ | + |
| Swelling in tubular epithelium | – | ++ | – |
| Hypertrophy in tubular epithelium | + | ++ | + |
| Fragmentation of glomerulus | – | + | + |
| Tubular degeneration | – | ++ | ++ |
| Loss of hematopoietic tissue | – | + | + |
| Transmission electron microscopic | |||
| Vacuolation in epithelial cytoplasm | – | +++ | + |
| Damage in proximal convoluted tubules | – | ++ | – |
| Dilated mitochondria | – | + | ++ |
Figure 3Histopathological photomicrographs of liver of H. fossilis under control condition (C), Almix treated laboratory condition (AL), Almix treated field condition (AF). 3.1 Showing normal appearance of hepatocytes (HC), compact arrangement around central vein (CV) with distinct nucleus (N) under light microscopy (C×400). 3.2 Showing hypertrophied and pyknotic nuclei (white arrow), vacuolation in hepatocytes (broken arrow) under light microscopy (AL×400). 3.3 Light microscopy showing vacuolation in HC (broken arrow) (AF×1000). 3.4 Normal appearance of hepatocytes with large number of mitochondria (M), rough endoplasmic reticulum (RER) and glycogen droplets (GY) under transmission electron microscopy (C×4000). 3.5 Hepatocytes with degenerated RER (square) and mitochondria (bold arrow) and vacuolation in cytoplasm (broken arrow) under transmission electron microscopy (AL×8000). 3.6 Under transmission electron microscopy hepatocytes showing almost normal nucleus (N) and vast amount of glycogen droplets (GY) with dilated mitochondria (bold arrow) (AF×6300).
Figure 4Histopathological photomicrographs of kidney of H. fossilis under control condition (C), Almix treated laboratory condition (AL), Almix treated field condition (AF). 4.1 Normal proximal convoluted tubule (PCT), distal convoluted tubule (DCT), Bowman’s capsule and glomerulus (G) under light microscopy (C×1000). 4.2 Degeneration of PCT and DCT (arrow) and fragmentation of glomerulus (white arrow) under light microscopy (AL×1000). 4.3 Light microscopy showing normal structure of PCT and DCT (AF×1000). 4.4 Normal appearance of kidney with electron dense mitochondria (M), nucleus (N) and rough endoplasmic reticulum (RER) with abundant vesicular structures (V) under transmission electron microscopy (C×5000). 4.5 Degenerative mitochondria (bold arrow), deformed nucleus (arrow), dilated, fragmented and vesiculated of RER (square) and severe vacuolation (broken arrow) under transmission electron microscopy (AL×2550). 4.6 Showing dilated mitochondria (bold arrow) and lower amount of vacuolation (broken arrow) under transmission electron microscopy (AF×3200).