Pathological evaluation is typically conducted by observing tissue specimens. The
evaluation results are very important from the viewpoint of examining histopathological
changes directly. However, pathological evaluation often generates bias among facilities or
observers. One of the means for reducing the bias is to quantify the histopathological
changes. Appropriate quantification of histopathological changes consistent with the
observation results enables pathological evaluation with objectivity and high
reproducibility. Furthermore, it is possible to quantify the degree of subtle
histopathological changes that cannot be distinguished by observers. An objective and highly
accurate quantitative analysis can lead to an improvement in reliability and persuasiveness.
If quantitative analysis is automated, the efficiency of the pathological evaluation is
expected to be improved.Recently, with the development of information technology, digital pathology has also
developed remarkably. An increasing number of researchers have been attempting to analyze
and diagnose pathological tissues using machine learning or artificial intelligence
(AI)[1], [2], [3], [4],
[5], [6]. Particularly, in the clinical field, automatic
recognition of morphologically complex cancer tissues has become possible with high
accuracy[7], [8], [9]. On the other hand, in the nonclinical field, there are many cases of
simply quantifying specific stained regions, but there are not so many cases of analyzing
and quantifying complex tissue morphology.We have attempted to analyze and quantify various histopathological findings using
conventional image processing software in order to turn the quantitative results into
indicators of drug efficacy or toxicity[6], [10]. Several
findings were quantified by devising innovative means of morphological processing and
functions of image processing software. These quantitative findings were correlated with
evaluations by pathologists. However, quantitative analysis requires high expertise in the
setting of conditions and construction of algorithms for image processing software.
Therefore, it is not easy for everyone to analyze a tissue image, and this practice tends to
be of low versatility.Recent reports have used the image analysis platform HALO, which can easily separate tissue
classes and quantify various morphological features in pathological tissue[11], [12], [13]. This makes many morphometric measurements of pathological tissue
possible. Using HALO, we attempted to quantify various findings, including hepatocellular
degeneration/necrosis and atrophy of the marginal zone in the spleen, that were hard or
impossible to analyze with conventional image processing software[6]. In this report, we introduce quantifiable examples of several
histopathological findings and mention future prospects.
Methods, Results, and Discussion
In this study, we used tissue specimens that were fixed in formalin, embedded in paraffin,
and stained with hematoxylin and eosin (HE) or immunostained. Whole digital slide images
were obtained using virtual microscopy (Aperio AT2, Leica Biosystems, Wetzlar, Germany).
Using HALO (v2.2.1870.17, Indica Labs, Albuquerque, NM, USA), histopathological features of
target findings were analyzed and quantified. Table
1 shows a summary of target findings, measurement parameters, and the applied
HALO modules. The tissue classifier module has a random forests algorithm, which is one of
the machine learning methods for constructing a multitude of decision trees during
training[14]. In each experiment, the
number of specimens per grade was one (n=1), and tissue classes were separated based on
learning from several representative images. The detailed methods of each analysis are
described in the following section.
Table 1.
Summary of Quantified Findings, Measurement Parameters, and the Applied HALO
Module
Hepatocellular degeneration/necrosis in the liver
Hepatocellular degeneration/necrosis in a specimen stained with HE is relatively easy to
recognize because morphological changes such as eosinophilic cytoplasm and atrophied
nuclei are comprehensively observed. However, when analyzing detailed morphological
features, the eosinophilic color tone present within hepatocytes undergoing
degeneration/necrosis is also present in normal hepatocytes. This makes it hard to
distinguish them clearly using conventional image analysis[6]. In this study, the morphological features of hepatocytes
undergoing degeneration/necrosis, red blood cells, and the other components (mainly normal
hepatocytes) were learned and separated by the tissue classifier module (random forest
algorithm) of HALO using specimens graded as − (no change), + (slight), or ++ (moderate)
for the degree of hepatocellular degeneration/necrosis. The area of interest was then
quantified. Fig. 1b, d, f, and h show the images separated using the tissue classifier module. Degeneration/necrosis
area is expressed as a ratio to the whole liver area analyzed. The results of the
quantitative analysis were correlated with the degree of degeneration/necrosis graded by
pathologists (Fig. 1i).
Fig. 1.
Quantification of hepatocellular degeneration/necrosis area. (a, c, e, g) Original
images. (b, d, f, h) Segmented images of degeneration/necrosis (green), red blood
cells (red), and the other regions (pink) through the use of the tissue classifier
module. (g, h) Enlarged images of blue frames in (e) and (f), respectively. Grade of
degeneration/necrosis evaluated by pathologists: (a, b) no change, −; (c, d) slight,
+; (e–h) moderate, ++. Bar = 1 mm. (i) Quantitative results for
degeneration/necrosis area (% of the whole area of the liver section).
Quantification of hepatocellular degeneration/necrosis area. (a, c, e, g) Original
images. (b, d, f, h) Segmented images of degeneration/necrosis (green), red blood
cells (red), and the other regions (pink) through the use of the tissue classifier
module. (g, h) Enlarged images of blue frames in (e) and (f), respectively. Grade of
degeneration/necrosis evaluated by pathologists: (a, b) no change, −; (c, d) slight,
+; (e–h) moderate, ++. Bar = 1 mm. (i) Quantitative results for
degeneration/necrosis area (% of the whole area of the liver section).
Bile duct proliferation in the liver
The bile duct is a stimulus-sensitive tissue component known to proliferate in many
hepatobiliary disorders. The morphological features of the bile duct, infiltrating cells
with form similar to the bile duct, red blood cells, and other components (mainly normal
hepatocytes) were learned and separated by the tissue classifier module using HE-stained
specimens graded as −, +, or ++ for the degree of bile duct proliferation. The area of
interest was then quantified. Figure 2b, d, and
f show the images separated using the tissue classifier module. Bile duct area is
expressed as a ratio to the whole liver area analyzed. The results of the quantitative
analysis showed that the area (number) of the bile duct increased in correlation with the
degree of bile duct proliferation graded by pathologists (Fig. 2g). Although this did not occur in the present study, it
should be noted that if an extremely large bile duct is present within the analyzed
region, it is necessary to exclude it by limiting the size of bile duct because the area
of such a large bile duct may be equal to that of the proliferated bile duct.
Fig. 2.
Quantification of the bile duct area in the liver. (a, c, e) Original images. (b,
d, f) Segmented images of bile duct (green), infiltrating cells (light blue), red
blood cells (orange), and other regions (pink) using the tissue classifier module.
Grade of proliferation of bile duct evaluated by pathologists: (a, b) no change, −;
(c, d) slight, +; (e, f) moderate, ++. Bar = 100 μm. (g) Quantitative results for
bile duct area (% of the whole area of the liver section).
Quantification of the bile duct area in the liver. (a, c, e) Original images. (b,
d, f) Segmented images of bile duct (green), infiltrating cells (light blue), red
blood cells (orange), and other regions (pink) using the tissue classifier module.
Grade of proliferation of bile duct evaluated by pathologists: (a, b) no change, −;
(c, d) slight, +; (e, f) moderate, ++. Bar = 100 μm. (g) Quantitative results for
bile duct area (% of the whole area of the liver section).
Basophilic tubules and hyaline casts in the kidney
Various pathological changes in the kidney stained with HE can be observed due to renal
dysfunction. Basophilization of the renal tubule is a regenerative pathological change
that occurs in the process of repairing renal tubule injury. Hyaline casts are often
caused by impairment of the glomerular filtration barrier. The morphological features of
basophilic tubules, hyaline casts, red blood cells, and other components (normal tubules,
glomeruli, and the renal pelvis) were learned and separated by the tissue classifier
module using HE-stained specimens in which the degree of basophilic tubules was graded as
− or + and that of hyaline casts was graded as − or +. Each area of interest was then
quantified. Each area is expressed as a ratio to the whole kidney area analyzed. Figure 3b, d, and f show the separated images. The results of the quantitative analysis showed that
basophilic tubules and hyaline casts increased in correlation with the degree graded by
pathologists (Fig. 3g).
Fig. 3.
Quantification of the areas of basophilic tubules and hyaline casts in the kidney.
(a, c, e) Original images. (b, d, f) Segmented images of basophilic tubules (blue),
hyaline casts (yellow), red blood cells (red), and other regions (pink) using the
tissue classifier module. (e, f) Enlarged images of green frames in (c) and (d),
respectively. Grade of basophilic tubules and hyaline casts evaluated by
pathologists: (a, b) no change, −; (c–f) slight, +. Bar = 1 mm (a–d) and 100 μm (e,
f). (g) Quantitative results for segmented areas (% of the whole area of the kidney
section).
Quantification of the areas of basophilic tubules and hyaline casts in the kidney.
(a, c, e) Original images. (b, d, f) Segmented images of basophilic tubules (blue),
hyaline casts (yellow), red blood cells (red), and other regions (pink) using the
tissue classifier module. (e, f) Enlarged images of green frames in (c) and (d),
respectively. Grade of basophilic tubules and hyaline casts evaluated by
pathologists: (a, b) no change, −; (c–f) slight, +. Bar = 1 mm (a–d) and 100 μm (e,
f). (g) Quantitative results for segmented areas (% of the whole area of the kidney
section).It was not possible to segment tissue classes included in the other components using the
tissue classifier module. Automated detection of glomeruli using the histogram of oriented
gradients (HOG) has been reported[4],
[5]. By using an analysis that
makes use of a deep learning algorithm, it may be possible to analyze more detailed tissue
forms including glomeruli.
Cortical atrophy in the thymus
Histologically, the structure of the thymus can be divided into the cortex and medulla,
and these zones are often changed morphologically due to stress or immune stimulation. The
morphological features of the cortex, medulla, capsule, and red blood cells in the thymus
stained with HE were learned and separated by the tissue classifier module using specimens
graded as −, +, or ++ for the degree of cortical atrophy. The area of interest was then
quantified. Figure 4b, d, and f show the separated images. The results of the quantitative analysis were correlated
with the degree of cortical atrophy graded by pathologists (Fig. 4g), which suggested that cortical atrophy contributed greatly
to atrophy of the thymus.
Fig. 4.
Quantification of the cortex area in the thymus. (a, c, e) Original images. (b, d,
f) Segmented images of the cortex (blue), medulla (green), red blood cells (red),
and capsule (orange) using the tissue classifier module. Grade of cortical atrophy
evaluated by pathologists: (a, b) no change, −; (c, d) slight, +; (e, f) moderate,
++. Bar = 1 mm. (g) Quantitative results for segmented areas.
Quantification of the cortex area in the thymus. (a, c, e) Original images. (b, d,
f) Segmented images of the cortex (blue), medulla (green), red blood cells (red),
and capsule (orange) using the tissue classifier module. Grade of cortical atrophy
evaluated by pathologists: (a, b) no change, −; (c, d) slight, +; (e, f) moderate,
++. Bar = 1 mm. (g) Quantitative results for segmented areas.
Degeneration/necrosis in the skeletal muscle fibers
Skeletal muscle fibers undergoing degeneration/necrosis, in which the cell walls were
impaired and blood containing IgG flowed into the cells, were immunostained with anti-IgG
antibody, as described in a previous report[15]. However, IgG is also observed in other regions including connective
tissue and interstitial tissue, making it hard to distinguish only muscle fibers
undergoing degeneration/necrosis by conventional image analysis. In this study, the
morphological features of anti-IgG antibody-immunostained muscle fibers, an anti-IgG
antibody-immunostained “other region”, and an unstained region were learned and separated
by the tissue classifier module using immunostained specimens graded as − or + for the
degree of staining intensity of the muscle fibers. Each area of interest was then
quantified. Figure 5b and d show the separated images. Each area is expressed as a ratio to the whole muscle
area analyzed. The results of the quantitative analysis were correlated with the degree of
degeneration/necrosis graded by pathologists (Fig.
5e).
Fig. 5.
Quantification of the IgG-stained muscle fibers area. (a, c) Original images. (b,
d) Segmented images of the IgG-stained muscle fiber region (red), IgG-stained other
region (yellow), and unstained region (light blue) using the tissue classifier
module. Grade of the IgG-stained muscle fiber (degeneration/necrosis of muscle
fibers) area evaluated by pathologists: (a, b) no change, −; (c, d) slight, +. Bar =
200 μm. (e) Quantitative results for segmented areas (% of the whole area of the
skeletal muscle section).
Quantification of the IgG-stained muscle fibers area. (a, c) Original images. (b,
d) Segmented images of the IgG-stained muscle fiber region (red), IgG-stained other
region (yellow), and unstained region (light blue) using the tissue classifier
module. Grade of the IgG-stained muscle fiber (degeneration/necrosis of muscle
fibers) area evaluated by pathologists: (a, b) no change, −; (c, d) slight, +. Bar =
200 μm. (e) Quantitative results for segmented areas (% of the whole area of the
skeletal muscle section).
Atrophy of the white pulp and marginal zone, and extramedullary hematopoiesis in the
spleen
The region of red pulp, white pulp, and marginal zone in the spleen often change as a
result of the immune stimulation. The degree of extramedullary hematopoiesis in the spleen
is affected by the condition of hematopoiesis in the bone marrow. In this study, atrophy
of the white pulp, atrophy of the marginal zone, and extramedullary hematopoiesis were
analyzed in the spleen stained with HE. First, the morphological features of the red pulp,
white pulp, and marginal zone were learned and separated by the tissue classifier module.
Each area of interest was then quantified. Figure 6b,
e, h, k, n, and q show the separated images. The results of the quantitative analysis were correlated
with the degree of atrophy of the marginal zone graded by pathologists as −, +, or, ++
(Fig. 6s). Next, the cytonuclear module was
used to recognize, within the red pulp region separated in the first step, the nuclei of
erythroblasts and red blood cells based upon their color tone and size, and each
cytoplasmic area was set so as not to overlap neighboring cells. Cell numbers in each area
of interest were then quantified. Figure 6c, f, i, l,
o, and r show the analyzed images. The results of the quantitative analysis were
correlated with the degree of decreased extramedullary hematopoiesis (erythroblasts)
graded by pathologists (Fig. 6t).
Fig. 6.
Quantification of the red pulp, white pulp, and marginal zone areas in the spleen
and number of erythroblasts in the red pulp. (a, d, g, j, m, p) Original images. (b,
e, h, k, n, q) Segmented images of the red pulp (pink), white pulp (blue), and
marginal zone (light blue) using the tissue classifier module. (c, f, j, l, o, r)
Analyzed images of erythroblasts (blue) and red blood cells (red) using the
cytonuclear module. (d–f, j–l, p–r) Enlarged images of green frames in (a–c), (g–i),
and (m–o), respectively. Grade of atrophy of the marginal zone evaluated by
pathologists: (a, b, d, e) no change, −; (g, h, j, k) slight, +; (m, n, p, q)
moderate, ++. Grade of decreased extramedullary hematopoiesis evaluated by
pathologists: (a, c, d, f, g, i, j, l) no change, −; (m, o, p, r) slight, +. Bar = 1
mm (a–c, g–i, m–o) and 100 μm (d–f, j–l, p–r). (s) Quantitative results for
segmented areas. (t) Quantitative results for erythroblast numbers.
Quantification of the red pulp, white pulp, and marginal zone areas in the spleen
and number of erythroblasts in the red pulp. (a, d, g, j, m, p) Original images. (b,
e, h, k, n, q) Segmented images of the red pulp (pink), white pulp (blue), and
marginal zone (light blue) using the tissue classifier module. (c, f, j, l, o, r)
Analyzed images of erythroblasts (blue) and red blood cells (red) using the
cytonuclear module. (d–f, j–l, p–r) Enlarged images of green frames in (a–c), (g–i),
and (m–o), respectively. Grade of atrophy of the marginal zone evaluated by
pathologists: (a, b, d, e) no change, −; (g, h, j, k) slight, +; (m, n, p, q)
moderate, ++. Grade of decreased extramedullary hematopoiesis evaluated by
pathologists: (a, c, d, f, g, i, j, l) no change, −; (m, o, p, r) slight, +. Bar = 1
mm (a–c, g–i, m–o) and 100 μm (d–f, j–l, p–r). (s) Quantitative results for
segmented areas. (t) Quantitative results for erythroblast numbers.
Atrophy of acinar cells in the parotid gland
In this study, the size of the acinar cells was analyzed in the parotid gland stained
with HE. First, the morphological features of acinar cells and other regions (duct,
interstitial connective tissue, and capsule) were learned and separated by the tissue
classifier module. Figure 7b and e show the separated images. Next, the area of each acinar cell within the acinar
cell region (12.5 mm2 area as wide as possible in the specimen) separated in
the first step was quantified using the vacuole module. Although acinar cells are not
vacuoles, their morphological features, including their nuclei and distinct contours, are
similar to vacuoles. Therefore, each acinar cell could be analyzed by the vacuole module
in this study. Figure 7c and f show the analyzed
images. The areas of the acinar cells were quantified and sorted in increments of 10
μm2, and the total numbers of acinar cells per size were calculated (Fig. 7g). There was an increased number of smaller
acinar cells in the specimen for which the degree of atrophy of the acinar cells was
evaluated as +.
Fig. 7.
Quantification of the number of acinar cells in the parotid gland. (a, d) Original
images. (b, e) Segmented images of acinar cells (yellow) and other regions (pink)
using the tissue classifier module. (c, f) Analyzed images of acinar cell size using
the vacuole module. Nuclei are blue. Grade of atrophy of acinar cells evaluated by
pathologists: (a, c) no change, − (orange); (d, f) slight, + (red). Bar = 100 μm.
(g) Quantitative results for acinar cell size. Total area of acinar cells per size.
The numbers of acinar cells within 10-μm2 size fractions ranging from 0
to 50 μm2 and the number of those >50 μm2 in size were
calculated.
Quantification of the number of acinar cells in the parotid gland. (a, d) Original
images. (b, e) Segmented images of acinar cells (yellow) and other regions (pink)
using the tissue classifier module. (c, f) Analyzed images of acinar cell size using
the vacuole module. Nuclei are blue. Grade of atrophy of acinar cells evaluated by
pathologists: (a, c) no change, − (orange); (d, f) slight, + (red). Bar = 100 μm.
(g) Quantitative results for acinar cell size. Total area of acinar cells per size.
The numbers of acinar cells within 10-μm2 size fractions ranging from 0
to 50 μm2 and the number of those >50 μm2 in size were
calculated.
Conclusion
In this report, we presented several examples of analyses in which various
histopathological changes and findings were quantified using HALO. By appropriately training
the tissue classifier module to learn the morphological features of each tissue class, the
tissues were separated into different classes, and the areas of interest were quantified.
Additionally, after separation by the tissue classifier module, each cell was analyzed in
detail by another module, such as the cytonuclear or vacuole modules. Although not described
in detail in this report, it was possible to analyze and quantify various findings in the
liver, adipocyte, sublingual gland, and adrenal grand (Table 1) by using modules that could analyze their morphological features.
Furthermore, by using various modules in combination, it will be possible to automatically
analyze other findings, not just the examples shown in this report. In fact, many cases of
analyses using various modules with HALO have been reported[16], [17], [18],
[19], [20].It was hard for the tissue classifier module with the random forest algorithm to recognize
more detailed tissue forms such as glomeruli. However, by using deep learning with a
conventional neural network, it may be possible in the future to recognize the morphological
features of glomerular or other detailed tissue structures of various findings, including
those of inflammatory cells, single cell death, or mitosis.Morphometry and diagnosis are not as popular yet in nonclinical fields compared with
clinical cancer diagnosis. However, as shown in this report, various findings in nonclinical
fields may be analyzed by using HALO. Each HALO module is specialized for analyzing target
morphological features of pathological tissue. The setting of parameters and operation of
HALO are simple, making it easy to handle for researchers who lack image analysis
experience.This report only shows typical results of quantitative analysis using several examples.
Whether or not a specimen can be analyzed and HALO can be put into practical use for image
analysis using the same setting parameters depends on the uniformity of the specimen’s color
tone, and the method may need to be validated before each study. However, HALO is not a
complicated analysis methods and is user-friendly. This makes it a highly versatile tool in
a variety of pathological examinations. In the future, we expect that image analysis of
pathological tissue will further develop and that the quantitative data of findings will
support pathologic evaluations and image diagnoses and will be used as indicators of drug
efficacy or drug toxicity.
Disclosure of Potential Conflicts of Interest
All authors are employees of Mitsubishi Tanabe Pharma Corporation. The authors declare that
they have no conflicts of interest.
Authors: Maria L Ascierto; Alvin Makohon-Moore; Evan J Lipson; Janis M Taube; Tracee L McMiller; Alan E Berger; Jinshui Fan; Genevieve J Kaunitz; Tricia R Cottrell; Zachary A Kohutek; Alexander Favorov; Vladimir Makarov; Nadeem Riaz; Timothy A Chan; Leslie Cope; Ralph H Hruban; Drew M Pardoll; Barry S Taylor; David B Solit; Christine A Iacobuzio-Donahue; Suzanne L Topalian Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2017-02-13 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: Jin Tae Kwak; Stephen M Hewitt; André Alexander Kajdacsy-Balla; Saurabh Sinha; Rohit Bhargava Journal: BMC Bioinformatics Date: 2016-06-01 Impact factor: 3.169
Authors: Christine Guntermann; Alessandro Piaia; Marie-Laure Hamel; Diethilde Theil; Tina Rubic-Schneider; Alberto Del Rio-Espinola; Linda Dong; Andreas Billich; Klemens Kaupmann; Janet Dawson; Klemens Hoegenauer; David Orain; Samuel Hintermann; Rowan Stringer; Dhavalkumar D Patel; Arno Doelemeyer; Mark Deurinck; Jens Schümann Journal: JCI Insight Date: 2017-03-09
Authors: Andrew P Lieberman; Zhigang Yu; Sue Murray; Raechel Peralta; Audrey Low; Shuling Guo; Xing Xian Yu; Constanza J Cortes; C Frank Bennett; Brett P Monia; Albert R La Spada; Gene Hung Journal: Cell Rep Date: 2014-04-16 Impact factor: 9.423
Authors: E Van Cutsem; Y-J Bang; W Mansoor; R D Petty; Y Chao; D Cunningham; D R Ferry; N R Smith; P Frewer; J Ratnayake; P K Stockman; E Kilgour; D Landers Journal: Ann Oncol Date: 2017-06-01 Impact factor: 32.976
Authors: Zuwena A Richardson; Claire Deleage; Candani S A Tutuka; Marzena Walkiewicz; Perla M Del Río-Estrada; Rachel D Pascoe; Vanessa A Evans; Gustavo Reyesteran; Michael Gonzales; Samuel Roberts-Thomson; Mauricio González-Navarro; Fernanda Torres-Ruiz; Jacob D Estes; Sharon R Lewin; Paul U Cameron Journal: J Immunol Methods Date: 2021-12-02 Impact factor: 2.287
Authors: Daniel Kazdal; Eugen Rempel; Cristiano Oliveira; Michael Allgäuer; Alexander Harms; Kerstin Singer; Elke Kohlwes; Steffen Ormanns; Ludger Fink; Jörg Kriegsmann; Michael Leichsenring; Katharina Kriegsmann; Fabian Stögbauer; Luca Tavernar; Jonas Leichsenring; Anna-Lena Volckmar; Rémi Longuespée; Hauke Winter; Martin Eichhorn; Claus Peter Heußel; Felix Herth; Petros Christopoulos; Martin Reck; Thomas Muley; Wilko Weichert; Jan Budczies; Michael Thomas; Solange Peters; Arne Warth; Peter Schirmacher; Albrecht Stenzinger; Mark Kriegsmann Journal: Transl Lung Cancer Res Date: 2021-04
Authors: Jordan H Creed; Christopher M Wilson; Alex C Soupir; Christelle M Colin-Leitzinger; Gregory J Kimmel; Oscar E Ospina; Nicholas H Chakiryan; Joseph Markowitz; Lauren C Peres; Anna Coghill; Brooke L Fridley Journal: Bioinformatics Date: 2021-11-04 Impact factor: 6.931
Authors: Mark Marsland; Amiee Dowdell; Chen Chen Jiang; James S Wilmott; Richard A Scolyer; Xu Dong Zhang; Hubert Hondermarck; Sam Faulkner Journal: Int J Mol Sci Date: 2022-04-12 Impact factor: 6.208
Authors: Christopher M Wilson; Oscar E Ospina; Mary K Townsend; Jonathan Nguyen; Carlos Moran Segura; Joellen M Schildkraut; Shelley S Tworoger; Lauren C Peres; Brooke L Fridley Journal: Cancers (Basel) Date: 2021-06-17 Impact factor: 6.575