N Bhat1, S S Mantri2, G V Iliev3, F A Qahtani4, S Godbole5, S P Mantri6, A S Bal7. 1. Department of Public Health Dentistry, Pacific Dental College and Hospital, Udaipur, Rajasthan, India. 2. Department of Prosthodontics and Crown and Bridge, Pacific Academy of Higher Education and Research University, Udaipur, Rajasthan, India. 3. Department of Prosthetic Dental Medicine, Faculty of Dental Medicine, Medical University, Sofia, Bulgaria. 4. Faculty of Dentistry Vascular, Neuro and Interventional Radiologist, Al Baha University, Al Bahah, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. 5. Professor Prosthodontics Crown and Bridge, Sharad Pawar Dental College, Sawangi, Wardha, Maharashtra, India. 6. Professor and Head, Conservative Dentistry, Hitkarini Dental College and Hospital, Jabalpur, Madhya Pradesh, India. 7. M.D.S. Orthodontist, Private Practitioner, Jabalpur, Madhya Pradesh, India.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Facial features and personality types vary with different geographical boundaries, culture, and ethnicity. The impression created by teeth design differs with the face and personality of males and females. AIMS: This study evaluated the dominant facial and personality types and their correlation among males and females in Central Indian population. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: The full-face photographs of 120 people, with a broad smile and visible dentition, were calibrated to generate a facial map with digital software. The participants filled a personality questionnaire. Facial form and personality type were classified as a combination of strong, dynamic, delicate, and calm. Descriptive and inferential statistics using Chi-square and Kappa tests. RESULTS: The dominant facial form was calm (66.67%, 71.67%) with the second dominant facial form being dynamic (50%, 51.67%) both for males and females respectively. While the dominant personality type was dynamic (50%), the second dominant personality type was calm (35%, 30%) for both males and females. Kappa analysis showed moderate agreement between the dominant facial and personality types (P = 0.41 in males, P = 0.10 in females). The software used was SPSS 22.0 version and P < 0.05 is considered as the level of significance. CONCLUSIONS: A varying number of combinations are essential in characterizing the face. The personality type has a predominance of one type over other. The interpretation of these combinations in dentistry can help to select appropriate tooth forms and design a harmonious smile.
BACKGROUND: Facial features and personality types vary with different geographical boundaries, culture, and ethnicity. The impression created by teeth design differs with the face and personality of males and females. AIMS: This study evaluated the dominant facial and personality types and their correlation among males and females in Central Indian population. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: The full-face photographs of 120 people, with a broad smile and visible dentition, were calibrated to generate a facial map with digital software. The participants filled a personality questionnaire. Facial form and personality type were classified as a combination of strong, dynamic, delicate, and calm. Descriptive and inferential statistics using Chi-square and Kappa tests. RESULTS: The dominant facial form was calm (66.67%, 71.67%) with the second dominant facial form being dynamic (50%, 51.67%) both for males and females respectively. While the dominant personality type was dynamic (50%), the second dominant personality type was calm (35%, 30%) for both males and females. Kappa analysis showed moderate agreement between the dominant facial and personality types (P = 0.41 in males, P = 0.10 in females). The software used was SPSS 22.0 version and P < 0.05 is considered as the level of significance. CONCLUSIONS: A varying number of combinations are essential in characterizing the face. The personality type has a predominance of one type over other. The interpretation of these combinations in dentistry can help to select appropriate tooth forms and design a harmonious smile.