Literature DB >> 3171924

Mean apical concentration and duration in the comparative bioavailability of slowly absorbed and eliminated drug preparations.

P T Pollak1, D J Freeman, S G Carruthers.   

Abstract

Present criteria for comparing bioavailability are inadequate when the Cmax and tmax cannot be reliably identified in individual subjects. Drug formulations which are slowly absorbed and eliminated have concentration-time profiles with a broad apex, increasing the likelihood that samples taken at the apical region of the curve will have statistically indistinguishable concentrations. Using data from a study of three dosage forms of piroxicam, we propose an alternative approach which decreases the influence of sampling bias and analytical error on the identification of the apex of the concentration-time curve and provides a simple tool for describing the shape of the curve around the apex. An adequate frequency of sampling around the expected apex of the concentration-time curve and consideration of the coefficient of variation (CV) of the analytical assay when assessing the observed Cmax are used in defining new parameters. This approach may be useful for studying the relationship of onset and duration of maximal plasma concentration to the efficacy and toxicity of drugs and in developing standards for comparing the bioavailability of slow-release preparations, which is of increasing interest to pharmaceutical companies and regulatory agencies.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1988        PMID: 3171924     DOI: 10.1002/jps.2600770603

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Pharm Sci        ISSN: 0022-3549            Impact factor:   3.534


  5 in total

Review 1.  Measures of exposure versus measures of rate and extent of absorption.

Authors:  M L Chen; L Lesko; R L Williams
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 6.447

2.  Single-dose FTY720 pharmacokinetics, food effect, and pharmacological responses in healthy subjects.

Authors:  John M Kovarik; Robert Schmouder; Denise Barilla; Yibin Wang; Gerolf Kraus
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 4.335

Review 3.  Novel drug delivery systems. An overview of their impact on clinical pharmacokinetic studies.

Authors:  P S Banerjee; J R Robinson
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  1991-01       Impact factor: 6.447

Review 4.  Metrics for the evaluation of bioequivalence of modified-release formulations.

Authors:  Laszlo Endrenyi; Laszlo Tothfalusi
Journal:  AAPS J       Date:  2012-08-22       Impact factor: 4.009

5.  Therapeutic Differences in 24-h Ambulatory Blood Pressures in Patients Switched Between Bioequivalent Nifedipine Osmotic Systems With Differing Delivery Technologies.

Authors:  P T Pollak; R J Herman; R D Feldman
Journal:  Clin Transl Sci       Date:  2017-02-24       Impact factor: 4.689

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.