| Literature DB >> 31718675 |
Zhe Hu1, Yiran Zhang1,2, Zhen Wang1, Jingjing Wang1, Qi Tong1, Mingyang Wang1, Honglei Sun1, Juan Pu1, Changqing Liu2, Jinhua Liu3, Yipeng Sun4.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: H9N2 influenza viruses continuously circulate in multiple avian species and are repeatedly transmitted to humans, posing a significant threat to public health. To investigate the adaptation ability of H9N2 avian influenza viruses (AIVs) to mammals and the mutations related to the host switch events, we serially passaged in mice two H9N2 viruses of different HA lineages - A/Quail/Hong Kong/G1/97 (G1) of the G1-like lineage and A/chicken/Shandong/ZB/2007 (ZB) of the BJ/94-like lineage -and generated two mouse-adapted H9N2 viruses (G1-MA and ZB-MA) that possessed significantly higher virulence than the wide-type viruses. FINDING: ZB-MA replicated systemically in mice. Genomic sequence alignment revealed 10 amino acid mutations coded by 4 different gene segments (PB2, PA, HA, and M) in G1-MA compared with the G1 virus and 23 amino acid mutations in 5 gene segments (PB1, PA, HA, M, and NS) in ZB-MA compared to ZB virus, indicating that the mutations in the polymerase, HA, M, and NS genes play critical roles in the adaptation of H9N2 AIVs to mammals, especially, the mutations of M1-Q198H and M1-A239T were shared in G1-MA and ZB-MA viruses. Additionally, several substitutions showed a higher frequency in human influenza viruses compared with avian viruses.Entities:
Keywords: Adaption; H9N2 avian influenza virus; Mice; Mutation
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31718675 PMCID: PMC6852949 DOI: 10.1186/s12985-019-1227-4
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Virol J ISSN: 1743-422X Impact factor: 4.099
Fig. 1Virulence of G-P9, ZB-P14, and wild-type viruses in mice. Groups of five six-week-old BALB/c mice were inoculated intranasally with G1-P9, ZB-P14, or wild-type H9N2 viruses. Body weight (a) and survival (b) were monitored daily for 14d
Virulence change of G1 and ZB virus during mouse adaption
| Virus | MLD50 (log10EID50ml− 1) | Change in MLD50 (log10decrease) |
|---|---|---|
| G1 | > 6 | NAa |
| ZB | > 6 | NA |
| G1-MA | 3.85 | > 2.15 |
| ZB-MA | 3.25 | > 2.75 |
a Not applicable
Fig. 2Virulence of G1-MA, ZB-MA and wild-type viruses in mice. a and c Relative weight loss. Mice were intranasally inoculated with 10 5 pfu of each virus. The body weights of five inoculated mice were measured daily and are represented as the percentage of the weight on the day of inoculation (day 0). b and d Survival percentages of mice infected with 105 pfu of each virus. e Immunohistochemically-stained of the brains Groups of eight six-week-old BALB/c mice were inoculated intranasally with 105 pfu of each viruses. IHC examinations were performed on the cerebrum of mice inoculated with PBS, ZB or ZB-MA virus. Sections of brains of mice infected with indicated viruses at 5 dpi are shown. In the immunohistochemical-stained brain sections, the viral antigen-positive cells are marked by brown pigment. Arrows show that cell positive for influenza virus signals were detected in the brains of infected mice. Images were taken at × 400 magnification
Viral distribution of wild-type and mouse-adapted viruses in different tissues in mice
| Virus | Mean virus titer in sample [log10 TCID50 ml−1] ± SD | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lung | Liver | Spleen | Kidney | Brain | |
| G1 | 3/3a | -b | – | – | – |
| (5.6 ± 0.6) | |||||
| G1-MA | 3/3 | – | – | – | – |
| (6.9 ± 0.3c) | |||||
| ZB | 3/3 | – | – | – | – |
| (5.0 ± 0.1) | |||||
| ZB-MA | 3/3 | 2/3 | 3/3 | 2/3 | 3/3 |
| (7.0 ± 0.1d) | (2.6 ± 0.1) | (3.3 ± 0.1) | (3.1 ± 0.2) | (3.7 ± 0.2) | |
aNo. of infected mice/total no. of mice
bNo virus was isolated from the sample
cThe lung titers in the G1-MA group were significantly higher than those in the G1 group (p < 0.05)
dThe lung titers in the ZB-MA group were significantly higher than those in the ZB group (p < 0.05)
Amino acid differences between the wild-type strain G1 and the mouse-adapted strain G1-MA
| Proteins | AA site | G1 | G1-MA | Avian H9N2 | Human H9N2 | pH1N1 | Human H3N2 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PB2 | 590a | S | R | G (97.5%) | S (100%) | S (85%) | T (47%) |
| S (45%) | |||||||
| G (8%) | |||||||
| G(15%) | |||||||
| S (2.5%) | |||||||
| PA | 349c | E | K | E (100%) | E (100%) | E (100%) | E (100%) |
| 486 | I | M | I (100%) | I (100%) | I (100%) | I (100%) | |
| HA | 204 (196)b c | I | M | T (95%) | T(60%) | / | / |
| K (4.2%) | I (40%) | ||||||
| A (0.6%) | |||||||
| I (0.2%) | |||||||
| 206 (198) | N | T | T (95%) | T (60%) | / | / | |
| A (4.2%) | |||||||
| N (0.8%) | |||||||
| N (40%) | |||||||
| 271 (263) | G | E | E (99%) | E (60%) | / | / | |
| G (0.5%) | |||||||
| V (0.5%) | G (40%) | ||||||
| M1 | 198 | Q | H | Q (100%) | Q (100%) | Q (99%) | Q (100%) |
| H (1%) | |||||||
| 239 | A | T | A (100%) | A (100%) | A (100%) | ||
| A (2%) | |||||||
| V (1%) | |||||||
| M2 | 91 | C | F | F (99.8%) | F (100%) | F (51%) | F (100%) |
| T (47%) | |||||||
| V (1%) | |||||||
| C (0.2%) | L (1%) | ||||||
| 93 | I | N | N (99.5%) | N (100%) | N (89%) | S (99%) | |
| I (0.1%) | |||||||
| K (0.1%) | |||||||
| S (0.1%) | |||||||
| T (0.1%) | S (9%) | ||||||
| D (1%) | N (1%) | ||||||
| T (1%) |
aH9 numbering
bH3 numbering is in parentheses
cThe substitutions also occurred in mice-adapted influenza viruses in the previous studies
dThe substitution which presents more frequently in human influenza viruses than H9N2 AIVs was shown by bold and underline formats
Amino acid differences between the wild-type strain ZB and the mouse-adapted strain ZB-MA
| Proteins | AA site | ZB | ZB-MA | Avian H9N2 | Human H9N2 | pH1N1 | Human H3N2 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PB1 | 141a | T | A | T (100%) | T (100%) | T (100%) | T (100%) |
| 708 | P | L | P (100%) | P (100%) | P (100%) | P (100%) | |
| PA | 97c | T | I | T (100%) | T (100%) | T (99%) | T (100%) |
| N(1%) | |||||||
| 489 | S | C | C (97%) | ||||
| S(3%) | |||||||
| HA | 27 (19)b | S | L | S (100%) | S (100%) | / | / |
| 517 (508) | E | G | E (99%) | E (100%) | / | / | |
| D (1%) | |||||||
| 556 (544) | C | R | C (100%) | C (100%) | / | / | |
| NA | 377 | V | I | V (89%) I (11%) | V (44%) | / | V (48%) |
| T (47%) | |||||||
| I (5%) | |||||||
| M1 | 29 | E | V | E (100%) | E (100%) | E (100%) | E (100%) |
| 119 | Y | H | Y (100%) | Y (100%) | Y (100%) | Y (100%) | |
| 157 | S | A | A (89%) | S (100%) | S (100%) | ||
| S (11%) | |||||||
| 158 | H | Q | Q (94%) | ||||
| H (6%) | |||||||
| 198 | Q | H | Q (100%) | Q (100%) | Q (99%) H (1%) | Q (100%) | |
| 219 | I | V | V (87%) | V (40%) | I (100%) | I (100%) | |
| I (13%) | I (60%) | ||||||
| 222 | Q | H | H (88%) | ||||
| Q (12%) | |||||||
| 239 | A | T | A (100%) | A (100%) | A (100%) | A (2%) | |
| M2 | 10 | H | L | L (57.1%) | P (98%) | P (100%) | |
| P (29.1%) | H (1%) | ||||||
| H (13.0%) | |||||||
| R (0.7%) | L (1%) | ||||||
| A (0.1%) | |||||||
| I (0.1%) | |||||||
| Y (0.1%) | |||||||
| 16 | E | G | E (85%) | E (87%) | |||
| V (12%) | G (13%) | E (1%) | |||||
| G (3%) | |||||||
| 27 | I | V | V (92%) | ||||
| I (5%) | I (1%) | ||||||
| M (3%) | T (1%) | ||||||
| A (1%) | |||||||
| 32 | V | I | I (83%) | ||||
| V (17%) | |||||||
| 37 | H | R | H (100%) | H (100%) | H (100%) | H (100%) | |
| NS1 | 74 | D | N | D (99%) | D (100%) | S (85%) | D (100%) |
| D (14%) | |||||||
| H (1%) | |||||||
| A (1%) | |||||||
| NS2 | 75 | E | V | E (99%) | E(100%) | E(100%) | E(100%) |
| K (0.7%) | |||||||
| D (0.3%) |
aH9 numbering
bH3 numbering is in parentheses
cThe substitutions also occurred in mice-adapted influenza viruses in the previous studies
dThe substitutions which present more frequently in human influenza viruses than H9N2 AIVs was shown by bold and underline formats
Fig. 3Schematic diagram of influenza viral protein function. The amino acid location of mutations in G1-MA are numbered and indicated with solid triangle on the linear sequence and mutations in ZB-MA are numbered and indicated with hollow triangle. The locations of regions of protein binding, or functions, are indicated with rectangles and are labeled with respect to the interacting viral proteins