Literature DB >> 31718393

Do Violence Acceptance and Bystander Actions Explain the Effects of Green Dot on Reducing Violence Perpetration in High Schools?

Heather M Bush1, Ann L Coker1, Sarah DeGue2, Emily R Clear1, Candace J Brancato1, Bonnie S Fisher3.   

Abstract

This study extends prior analyses from a 5-year multisite cluster-randomized controlled trial to examine how the previously reported effects of the Green Dot bystander-based prevention program worked to reduce violence perpetration. Bystander-based interventions are hypothesized to prevent violence by reducing violence acceptance and increasing trained participants' willingness and ability to actively engage others in violence prevention using safe and effective bystander actions to diffuse or avoid potentially violent situations. We tested this hypothesis by examining whether Green Dot worked to reduce violence through two mediators measured over time: reducing violence acceptance and increasing bystander actions. When accounting for changes in these mediators over time, the effect of this intervention on violence perpetration was hypothesized to be attenuated or explained. At baseline (spring 2010) and annually (2011-2014), all students in recruited high schools (13 intervention, 13 control) completed an anonymous survey (response rate = 83.9%). Student responses were aggregated as school-level counts for the analysis. Path analyses estimated direct and indirect effects at specific points in the implementation of the intervention. Longitudinal models were used to determine if changes in violence acceptance and bystander actions could explain or attenuate the effect of the intervention. Time-framed path model analyses indicated that the intervention worked as expected to increase bystander behaviors and reduce violence acceptance; both potential mediators were significantly associated with sexual violence perpetration. In addition, after adjusting intent-to-treat models for the hypothesized mediators, the intervention was no longer associated with violence perpetration. In conclusion, these findings indicate that this bystander intervention worked as hypothesized to reduce sexual violence perpetration by creating theory-based changes in students' violence acceptance and bystander actions.

Entities:  

Keywords:  adolescent victims; dating violence; domestic violence; intervention; prevention; sexual assault

Year:  2019        PMID: 31718393      PMCID: PMC7217713          DOI: 10.1177/0886260519888206

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Interpers Violence        ISSN: 0886-2605


  17 in total

1.  Popular opinion leaders and HIV prevention peer education: resolving discrepant findings, and implications for the development of effective community programmes.

Authors:  J A Kelly
Journal:  AIDS Care       Date:  2004-02

2.  Encouraging responses in sexual and relationship violence prevention: what program effects remain 1 year later?

Authors:  Mary M Moynihan; Victoria L Banyard; Alison C Cares; Sharyn J Potter; Linda M Williams; Jane G Stapleton
Journal:  J Interpers Violence       Date:  2014-05-20

3.  An evaluation of Safe Dates, an adolescent dating violence prevention program.

Authors:  V A Foshee; K E Bauman; X B Arriaga; R W Helms; G G Koch; G F Linder
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1998-01       Impact factor: 9.308

4.  Evaluation of Green Dot: an active bystander intervention to reduce sexual violence on college campuses.

Authors:  Ann L Coker; Patricia G Cook-Craig; Corrine M Williams; Bonnie S Fisher; Emily R Clear; Lisandra S Garcia; Lea M Hegge
Journal:  Violence Against Women       Date:  2011-06-02

5.  Evaluation of the Green Dot Bystander Intervention to Reduce Interpersonal Violence Among College Students Across Three Campuses.

Authors:  Ann L Coker; Bonnie S Fisher; Heather M Bush; Suzanne C Swan; Corrine M Williams; Emily R Clear; Sarah DeGue
Journal:  Violence Against Women       Date:  2014-08-14

6.  Challenge and opportunity in evaluating a diffusion-based active bystanding prevention program: Green Dot in high schools.

Authors:  Patricia G Cook-Craig; Ann L Coker; Emily R Clear; Lisandra S Garcia; Heather M Bush; Candace J Brancato; Corrine M Williams; Bonnie S Fisher
Journal:  Violence Against Women       Date:  2014-09-24

7.  Changing attitudes about being a bystander to violence: translating an in-person sexual violence prevention program to a new campus.

Authors:  Alison C Cares; Victoria L Banyard; Mary M Moynihan; Linda M Williams; Sharyn J Potter; Jane G Stapleton
Journal:  Violence Against Women       Date:  2014-12-24

8.  Community AIDS/HIV risk reduction: the effects of endorsements by popular people in three cities.

Authors:  J A Kelly; J S St Lawrence; L Y Stevenson; A C Hauth; S C Kalichman; Y E Diaz; T L Brasfield; J J Koob; M G Morgan
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1992-11       Impact factor: 9.308

9.  Ecological pathways to prevention: How does the SASA! community mobilisation model work to prevent physical intimate partner violence against women?

Authors:  Tanya Abramsky; Karen M Devries; Lori Michau; Janet Nakuti; Tina Musuya; Ligia Kiss; Nambusi Kyegombe; Charlotte Watts
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2016-04-16       Impact factor: 3.295

10.  RCT Testing Bystander Effectiveness to Reduce Violence.

Authors:  Ann L Coker; Heather M Bush; Patricia G Cook-Craig; Sarah A DeGue; Emily R Clear; Candace J Brancato; Bonnie S Fisher; Eileen A Recktenwald
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  2017-03-06       Impact factor: 5.043

View more
  4 in total

1.  Improving Social Norms and Actions to Prevent Sexual and Intimate Partner Violence: A Pilot Study of the Impact of Green Dot Community on Youth.

Authors:  Victoria L Banyard; Katie M Edwards; Andrew J Rizzo; Emily F Rothman; Patricia Greenberg; Megan C Kearns
Journal:  J Prev Health Promot       Date:  2020-10-29

2.  Effect sizes and intra-cluster correlation coefficients measured from the Green Dot High School study for guiding sample size calculations when designing future violence prevention cluster randomized trials in school settings.

Authors:  Md Tofial Azam; Heather M Bush; Ann L Coker; Philip M Westgate
Journal:  Contemp Clin Trials Commun       Date:  2021-08-11

3.  Bystander Intervention Efficacy to Reduce Teen Dating Violence Among High School Youth Who Did and Did Not Witness Parental Partner Violence: A Path Analysis of A Cluster RCT.

Authors:  Annelise Mennicke; Heather M Bush; Candace J Brancato; Ann L Coker
Journal:  J Fam Violence       Date:  2021-06-29

Review 4.  Bullying as a Developmental Precursor to Sexual and Dating Violence Across Adolescence: Decade in Review.

Authors:  Dorothy L Espelage; Katherine M Ingram; Jun Sung Hong; Gabriel J Merrin
Journal:  Trauma Violence Abuse       Date:  2021-09-14
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.