| Literature DB >> 31717935 |
Pierre Avril1, Luciano Vidal1, Sophie Barille-Nion2, Louis-Romée Le Nail1, Françoise Redini1, Pierre Layrolle1, Michelle Pinault3, Stéphane Chevalier3, Pierre Perrot1,4, Valérie Trichet1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Considering the positive or negative potential effects of adipocytes, depending on their lipid composition, on breast tumor progression, it is important to evaluate whether adipose tissue (AT) harvesting procedures, including epinephrine infiltration, may influence breast cancer progression.Entities:
Keywords: adipose tissue; breast cancer; breast reconstruction; epinephrine
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31717935 PMCID: PMC6888424 DOI: 10.3390/ijms20225626
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Mol Sci ISSN: 1422-0067 Impact factor: 5.923
Figure 1Michigan Cancer Foundation-7 (MCF7) cell growth with ELR solution-infiltrated adipose tissue conditioned medium (EI-CM). MCF7 cells were cultured during 24 h in a medium without any growth factor (0% FBS) or supplemented with fetal bovine serum (10% FBS) or EI-CM (25 to 50%) and MEM with 0%FBS. (a) Histogram shows the mitochondrial activity of MCF7 cells, measured by WST-1 assay. EI-CM were derived from 3 different donors (n°1 to n°3). Results are the means of 3 wells and are presented as a percentage of 0% FBS value with standard deviations. Statistically significant differences are indicated in comparison with 0% FBS (***: p < 0.0001). Each patient EI-CM was tested in 3 independent experiments. (b) Mitochondrial activity of MCF7 cells measured by WST-1 assay. Cells were cultured for 24 h with or without 5 or 10 µM of ERK inhibitor UO126. Results are the means of 3 wells and are presented as a percentage of condition without UO126 with standard deviations. Statistically significant differences are indicated in comparison with 0 UO126 (*: p < 0.05; ***: p < 0.0001). Two independent experiments were performed. (c) Histograms show the distribution of MCF7 cells in cell-cycle phases following DNA detection by flow cytometry. Because only 2–3% of cells were identified in the subG0 phase, only the proportion of cells in the G0/G1, S and G2/M phases are indicated.
List of genes analyzed by real time RT-PCR: Genes are presented with official gene symbols and corresponding full name. Forward and reverse primer sequences used to perform the analyses are indicated.
| Official Symbol | Official Full Name | Reverse Primer |
|---|---|---|
|
| Hypoxanthine PhosphoRibosyl Transferase 1 | CGAGCAAGACGTTCAGTCCT |
|
| Cluster of Differentiation 44 | CGGCAGGTTATATTCAAATCG |
|
| Twist-related protein 1 | TGCAGAGGTGTGAGGATGGTGC |
|
| Twist-related protein 2 | AGAAGGTCTGGCAATGGCAGCA |
|
| Snail family transcriptional repressor 1 | CAGCAGGTGGGCCTGGTCGTA |
|
| Cadherin 1 | CCAGCGGCCCCTTCACAGTC |
|
| Myelocytomatosis viral oncogene homolog | GATCCAGACTCTGACCTTTTGC |
Figure 2Quiescence of MCF7 cells with ELR solution-infiltrated adipose tissue conditioned medium (EI-CM). (a) Relative expression fold changes are presented for mRNA of MCF7 cells cultured either in monolayer (2-D) or in sphere (non-anchorage conditions, 3-D) during 3 days and treated 48 h in a medium supplemented with 1 or 10% FBS or with 25% EI-CM. Expression change of those 5 genes has been correlated to epithelial mesenchymal transition leading to invading phenotype of carcinoma cells. Full gene names and symbols are indicated in Table 1. Means of 3 samples are presented with standard deviations. Significant differences are not indicated as this experiment was not repeated. (b) Dot plots show the distribution in cell cycle phases (G0, G1 and S/G2/M) following DNA and Ki-67 detection in MCF7 cells cultured in spheres (3-D). Because only 2–3% of cells were identified in subG0 phase, only the proportion of cells in G0, G1, and S/G2/M phases are indicated. (c) Representative images of IHC detection of Ki-67 on MCF7 spheres (3-D). Magnification is indicated. (d) Histograms show the Ki-67 index (left panel) and the mean diameter (right panel) of MCF7 spheres. In the left panel, percentages were counted on 6 representative regions for each treatment after Ki-67 detection by IHC. In the right panel, mean diameter was calculated on 90 different spheres for each condition. Statistically significant differences are indicated in comparison with 1% FBS (**: p < 0.001). Three independent experiments were performed.
Figure 3MCF7 cell growth and lipid composition depending on ELR solution infiltration of harvested adipose tissue. (a) Histogram shows the mitochondrial activity of MCF7 cells measured after 24 h. For the left panel, cells were cultured in medium without FBS (0% FBS) or supplemented with 10% FBS or with 50% EI-CM and 50% MEM α with 0%FBS. AT samples were obtained from 2 different donors (n°4 and n°5) and were initially not-infiltrated (NI) or infiltrated with ELR (EI). For right panel, cells were cultured in a medium without FBS (0% FBS) or supplemented with 10% FBS, PBS or ELR, representing 1 to 50% of the total volume. *: p < 0.05; ***: p < 0.0001. (b) Histogram shows the total lipid amount detected in conditioned medium from infiltrated with ELR (EI-CM) or not-infiltrated AT (NI-CM) for 5 patients (n°6 to n°10) who are represented by a distinct geometric forms. Lipid amount is indicated in standard culture medium without FBS (MEM α). **: p = 0.0045 paired t-test. (c) Histogram shows the weight % of fatty acids derived from 5 donors either infiltrated or non-infiltrated with ELR. Saturated, mono-unsaturated or polyunsaturated fatty acids (SFA, MUFA or PUFA) were measured in a conditioned medium of epinephrine lactated Ringer’s solution-infiltrated or non-infiltrated adipose tissue (EI-CM or NI-CM).
Figure 4Single injection of either EI-AT or EI-CM in MCF7 tumor induced in athymic mouse. (a) Immunohistochemical staining of human Ki-67 protein in MCF7 tumors injected with PBS, EI-CM or EI-AT. Observation of mammary duct (top panel) and mammary fat pad (middle panel). (b) Evolution of tumor volume is reported for each group of mice (n = 6); the mean tumor volume is represented by a red line. The arrows indicate time of the intra-tumor injection of either PBS (top panel), or EI-CM (middle panel group) or EI-AT (low panel). At days 145 and 160, no significant difference between groups was detected by unpaired nonparametric method.