| Literature DB >> 31717817 |
Jesus Olivera1,2, Sofia Aparicio3, Margarita Gonzalez Hernández3, Arcady Zhukov4,5, Rastislav Varga6, Maximo Campusano1, Enmanuel Echavarria1, Jose Javier Anaya Velayos3.
Abstract
In this paper, a magnetic microwire-based sensor array embedded under the pavement is proposed as a weighing system at customs ports of entry. This sensor is made of a cementitious material suitable for embedding within the core of concrete structures prior to curing. The objective of this research is to verify the feasibility of stress monitoring for concrete materials using an array of cement-based stress/strain sensors that have been developed using the magnetic sensing property of an embedded microwire in a cement-based composite. Test results for microwire-based sensors and gauge sensors are compared. The strain sensitivity and their linearity are investigated through experimental testing under compressive loadings. Sensors made of these materials can be designed to satisfy specific needs and reduce costs in the production of sensor aggregates with improved coupling performance, thus avoiding any disturbance to the stress state.Entities:
Keywords: SHM; concrete; embedded sensor; ferromagnetic microwires; switching field
Year: 2019 PMID: 31717817 PMCID: PMC6864802 DOI: 10.3390/s19214658
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sensors (Basel) ISSN: 1424-8220 Impact factor: 3.576
Figure 1(a) MMCC sensors with an embedded microwire, and a strain gauge. (b) Electronic micrograph of the two embedded microwires.
Mix proportions of the mortar and concrete.
| Materials | Mortar | Concrete |
|---|---|---|
| White cement I 52.5R | 0.225 kg | 218 kg/m3 |
| Siliceous sand | 0.675 kg | 374 kg/m3 |
| Water | 0.101 kg | 82.6 kg/m3 |
| Gravel 0–4 | 255 kg/m3 | |
| Gravel 8–12 | 206 kg/m3 | |
| Sika Viscocrete 5990 | 2.2% of weight of cement | 1% of weight of cement |
Figure 2(a) MMCC sensors placed in the center of a normalized cubic mold of 150 mm3. (b) Concrete specimen with embedded sensors. (c) Schematic localization of the three sensors labeled 1, 2 and 3 and the strain gauge (G) in the concrete specimen during the stress cycles.
Figure 3Induction method of the switching field measurement used for the experiments.
Figure 4Compressive load and unload cycles applied on the concrete specimen.
Figure 5Concrete specimen with MMCC sensors and strain gauge placed in the hydraulic press.
Figure 6Ultrasonic images of the cubic specimen obtained after the stress cycles, (a) Azimuthal velocity, (b) Azimuthal attenuation, (c) Lateral velocity, (d) Lateral attenuation.
Figure 7Stress measurements performed during the loading/unloading tests in the concrete specimen using (a) MMCC sensors and (b) strain gauge.
Figure 8Forces measured for each embedded sensor during the loading/unloading test.
Figure 9Forces measured for each embedded sensor during the loading/unloading tests on each quadrant: (a) W1, (b) W2, (c) W3, (d) Gauge sensors.