Literature DB >> 31717760

Detecting and Monitoring Hate Speech in Twitter.

Juan Carlos Pereira-Kohatsu1, Lara Quijano-Sánchez1,2, Federico Liberatore2,3, Miguel Camacho-Collados4,5.   

Abstract

Social Media are sensors in the real world that can be used to measure the pulse of societies. However, the massive and unfiltered feed of messages posted in social media is a phenomenon that nowadays raises social alarms, especially when these messages contain hate speech targeted to a specific individual or group. In this context, governments and non-governmental organizations (NGOs) are concerned about the possible negative impact that these messages can have on individuals or on the society. In this paper, we present HaterNet, an intelligent system currently being used by the Spanish National Office Against Hate Crimes of the Spanish State Secretariat for Security that identifies and monitors the evolution of hate speech in Twitter. The contributions of this research are many-fold: (1) It introduces the first intelligent system that monitors and visualizes, using social network analysis techniques, hate speech in Social Media. (2) It introduces a novel public dataset on hate speech in Spanish consisting of 6000 expert-labeled tweets. (3) It compares several classification approaches based on different document representation strategies and text classification models. (4) The best approach consists of a combination of a LTSM+MLP neural network that takes as input the tweet's word, emoji, and expression tokens' embeddings enriched by the tf-idf, and obtains an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.828 on our dataset, outperforming previous methods presented in the literature.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Twitter; hate crime; predictive policing; sentiment analysis; social network analysis; text classification

Year:  2019        PMID: 31717760      PMCID: PMC6864473          DOI: 10.3390/s19214654

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sensors (Basel)        ISSN: 1424-8220            Impact factor:   3.576


  6 in total

1.  Can Twitter predict disease outbreaks?

Authors:  Connie St Louis; Gozde Zorlu
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2012-05-17

2.  Weighted kappa: nominal scale agreement with provision for scaled disagreement or partial credit.

Authors:  J Cohen
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  1968-10       Impact factor: 17.737

Review 3.  Machine learning: Trends, perspectives, and prospects.

Authors:  M I Jordan; T M Mitchell
Journal:  Science       Date:  2015-07-17       Impact factor: 47.728

4.  The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data.

Authors:  J R Landis; G G Koch
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  1977-03       Impact factor: 2.571

5.  Interrater reliability: the kappa statistic.

Authors:  Mary L McHugh
Journal:  Biochem Med (Zagreb)       Date:  2012       Impact factor: 2.313

6.  Prediction of crime occurrence from multi-modal data using deep learning.

Authors:  Hyeon-Woo Kang; Hang-Bong Kang
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-04-24       Impact factor: 3.240

  6 in total
  2 in total

1.  Detecting racism and xenophobia using deep learning models on Twitter data: CNN, LSTM and BERT.

Authors:  José Alberto Benítez-Andrades; Álvaro González-Jiménez; Álvaro López-Brea; Jose Aveleira-Mata; José-Manuel Alija-Pérez; María Teresa García-Ordás
Journal:  PeerJ Comput Sci       Date:  2022-03-01

2.  Anonymous Real-Time Analytics Monitoring Solution for Decision Making Supported by Sentiment Analysis.

Authors:  Gildásio Antonio de Oliveira Júnior; Robson de Oliveira Albuquerque; César Augusto Borges de Andrade; Rafael Timóteo de Sousa; Ana Lucila Sandoval Orozco; Luis Javier García Villalba
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2020-08-14       Impact factor: 3.576

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.