| Literature DB >> 31717738 |
Yubin Jun1, Seong Ho Han1, Tae Yong Shin1, Jae Hong Kim1.
Abstract
The effect of CO2 curing on alkali-activated slag paste activated by a mixture of sodium hydroxide and sodium silicate solutions is reported in this paper. The paste samples after demolding were cured in three different curing environments as follows: (1) environmental chamber maintained at 85% relative humidity (RH) and 25 °C; (2) 3-bar CO2 pressure vessel; and (3) CO2 chamber maintained at 20% CO2 concentration, 70% RH and 25 °C. The hardened samples were then subjected to compressive strength measurement, X-ray diffraction analysis, and thermogravimetry. All curing conditions used in this study were beneficial for the strength development of the alkali-activated slag paste samples. Among the curing environments, the 20% CO2 chamber was the most effective on compressive strength development; this is attributed to the simultaneous supply of moisture and CO2 within the chamber. The results of X-ray diffraction and thermogravimetry show that the alkali-activated slag cured in the 20% CO2 chamber received a higher amount of calcium silicate hydrate (C-S-H), while calcite formed at an early age was consumed with time. C-S-H was formed by associating the calcite generated by CO2 curing with the silica gel dissolved from alkali-activated slag.Entities:
Keywords: C-S-H; CO2 curing; alkali-activated slag; calcite; carbonation curing; vaterite
Year: 2019 PMID: 31717738 PMCID: PMC6862564 DOI: 10.3390/ma12213513
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Materials (Basel) ISSN: 1996-1944 Impact factor: 3.623
Chemical composition (oxides in wt.%) of ground-granulated blast-furnace slag (GGBFS).
| CaO | SiO2 | Al2O3 | Na2O | K2O | MgO | MnO | TiO2 | SO3 | P2O5 | Fe2O3 | Others |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 47.97 | 30.76 | 13.26 | 0.23 | 0.54 | 3.06 | 0.52 | 0.87 | 1.81 | 0.01 | 0.61 | 0.25 |
Note: Others include BaO, ZrO2, V2O5, SrO, and Y2O3.
Figure 1X-ray diffraction (XRD) patterns of raw GGBFS.
Mix proportions of samples.
| Binder (g) | Activator (g) | Activator/Binder | |
|---|---|---|---|
| GGBFS | 5M NaOH | Liquid Na2SiO3 | |
| 2400 | 480 | 480 | 0.4 |
Curing conditions of samples.
| Sample Label | Curing time | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 h | 3 h | 20 h | 6 Days | 35 Days | |
| Control | Chamber at 25 °C and 85% RH | Chamber at 25 °C and 85% RH | |||
| CO2P-T1 | 3-bar CO2 pressure vessel | Chamber at 25 °C and 85% RH | |||
| CO2P-T2 | 3-bar CO2 pressure vessel | Chamber at 25 °C and 85% RH | |||
| CO2P-T3 | 3-bar CO2 pressure vessel | Chamber at 25 °C and 85% RH | |||
| CO2-HC | 20%-concentration CO2 chamber at 25 °C and 70% RH | ||||
Note. Demolding after 1 h pre-curing; Strength, XRD, and TG tests at 4 h: Control, CO2P-T1, and CO2-HC samples; Strength, XRD, and TG tests at 24 h: Control, CO2P-T1, CO2P-T2, and CO2-HC samples; Strength, XRD, and TG tests at 7 days: Control, CO2P-T1, CO2P-T2, CO2P-T3, and CO2-HC samples; Strength test at 42 days: Control, CO2P-T1, CO2P-T2, CO2P-T3, and CO2-HC samples.
Compressive strengths of the paste samples.
| Sample Label | Compressive Strength (Standard Deviation), MPa | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4 h | 24 h | 7 Days | 42 Days | |
| Control | 14.78 (1.33) | 65.56 (1.88) | 85.77 (0.88) | 108.83 (3.52) |
| CO2P-T1 | 18.27 (1.1) | 55.72 (1.14) | 80.62 (2.99) | 85.6 (1.62) |
| CO2P-T2 | - | 53.47 (2.09) | 69.11 (2.6) | 74.69 (1.9) |
| CO2P-T3 | - | - | 61.96 (0.48) | 73.87 (2.57) |
| CO2-HC | 24.81 (1.96) | 81.77 (2.86) | 111.89 (1.88) | 121.98 (1.43) |
Figure 2Compressive strengths at 4 h (a) and 24 h (b).
Figure 3Pressure loss in the pressure vessel during CO2 curing.
Figure 4Compressive strength developments of paste samples cured under different curing conditions with curing time.
Figure 5XRD patterns of samples with curing time. (a) Control; (b) detailed XRD figure of the control sample in the 29–30° 2θ range with reference patterns of calcite and calcium silicate hydrate (C-S-H); (c) CO2P-T1; (d) CO2P-T2; (e) CO2P-T3; (f) CO2-HC. 1: calcite (PDF 98-005-2151), 2: C-S-H (PDF 00-033-0306), 3: C-S-H(I) (PDF 00-029-0331), and 4: vaterite (PDF 98-018-1959).
Figure 6TG and derivative TG (DTG) curves of (a) control, (b) CO2P-T1, (c) CO2P-T2, and (d) CO2-HC samples with curing time.
Calcite concentrations of the samples.
| Sample Label | Calcite Concentration | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 4 h | 24 h | 7 Days | |
| Control | 1.33% | 1.51% | 2.09% |
| CO2P-T1 | 1.43% | 2.90% | 4.07% |
| CO2P-T2 | - | 3.64% | 3.93% |
| CO2P-T3 | - | - | 2.76% |
| CO2-HC | 8.37% | 6.96% | 2.27% |