| Literature DB >> 31717726 |
Joonho Seo1, Solmoi Park1, Hyun No Yoon1, Jeong Gook Jang2, Seon Hyeok Kim1, H K Lee1.
Abstract
The solidification and stabilization of calcium carbide residue (CCR) using granulated blast furnace slag was investigated in this study. CCR binding in hydrated slag was explored by X-ray diffraction, 29Si and 27Al magic angle spinning (MAS) nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectroscopy, and thermodynamic calculations. Mercury intrusion porosimetry and and compressive strength tests assessed the microstructure and mechanical properties of the mixtures of slag and CCR. C-A-S-H gel, ettringite, hemicarbonate, and hydrotalcite were identified as the main phases in the mixture of slag and CCR. The maximum CCR uptake by slag and the highest volume of precipitated solid phases were reached when CCR loading in slag is 7.5% by mass of slag, according to the thermodynamic prediction. This feature is also experimentally observed in the microstructure, which showed an increase in the pore volume at higher CCR loading.Entities:
Keywords: calcium carbide residue; cementitious material; characterization; slag; solidification; stabilization
Year: 2019 PMID: 31717726 PMCID: PMC6862086 DOI: 10.3390/ma12213511
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Materials (Basel) ISSN: 1996-1944 Impact factor: 3.623
Chemical compositions of the CCR and slag used in this study.
| (wt.%) | Al2O3 | CaO | Fe2O3 | MgO | Na2O | P2O5 | SiO2 | TiO2 | LOI 1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CCR | 1.83 | 70.10 | 0.14 | 0.50 | 0.05 | 0.01 | 4.70 | 0.02 | 21.60 |
| Slag | 11.50 | 47.70 | 0.60 | 3.00 | - | 0.60 | 32.40 | 0.50 | 0.29 |
1 Loss-on-ignition.
Figure 1X-ray diffractograms of (a) CCR and (b) raw slag.
Figure 2X-ray diffractograms of the mixtures of slag and CCR.
Figure 3Normalized 27Al MAS NMR spectra of raw slag and mixtures of slag and CCR.
Figure 4Normalized 29Si MAS NMR spectra of raw slag and mixtures of slag and CCR.
Deconvolution results of 29Si MAS NMR spectra of CCR-loaded slag. The estimated chi-square tolerance value is 10−6. The provided data are the chemical shift (ppm) and integration of the relative area (%).
| Specimen ID | Anhydrous Slag | Q1 | Q2(1Al) | Q2 | Q3(1Al) | MCL | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ppm | % | ppm | % | ppm | % | ppm | % | ppm | % | ppm | % | ||
| C10 | −74.0 | 50.8 | −78.5 | 16.8 | −80.8 | 9.0 | −84.0 | 16.5 | −87.0 | 6.5 | −89.0 | 0.4 | 4.42 |
| C20 | −74.0 | 46.6 | −77.0 | 10.9 | −80.9 | 31.2 | −84.7 | 7.1 | −86.7 | 4.3 | 2.72 | ||
| C30 | −74.0 | 44.0 | −78.5 | 19.5 | −81.0 | 22.3 | −84.5 | 5.1 | −86.0 | 9.1 | 2.80 | ||
| C40 | −74.0 | 42.6 | −78.7 | 22.5 | −80.9 | 21.2 | −84.6 | 10.6 | −86.9 | 3.0 | 2.87 | ||
Figure 5Calculated phase composition of the mixtures of slag and CCR.
Figure 6Mercury intrusion porosimetry test results of the mixtures of slag and CCR: (a) log differential intrusion curve and (b) cumulative intrusion curve.
Pore characteristics of mixture of slag and CCR as measured by MIP.
| Specimen ID | Median Pore Diameter (nm) | Porosity (%) | Total Intrusion Volume (mL/g) |
|---|---|---|---|
| C10 | 17.9 | 35.5 | 0.19 |
| C20 | 14.2 | 38.0 | 0.21 |
| C30 | 14.4 | 38.7 | 0.22 |
| C40 | 10.0 | 42.9 | 0.27 |
Figure 7Unconfined compressive strength of the mixtures of slag and CCR.