| Literature DB >> 31717310 |
Shoichi Kikuchi1, Shunsuke Tamai2, Takao Kawai2, Yoshikazu Nakai2, Hiroki Kurita3, Sophie Gourdet4.
Abstract
TiB-reinforced Ti-3Al-2.5V matrix composites, in which TiB whiskers are oriented parallel to the direction of heat extrusion, were fabricated via mechanical alloying and hot isostatic pressing (HIP). To investigate the near-threshold fatigue crack propagation in TiB-reinforced Ti-3Al-2.5V matrix composites, stress intensity factor K-decreasing tests were conducted for disk-shaped compact specimens having two different orientations of TiB whiskers at force ratios from 0.1 to 0.8 under ambient conditions. The crack growth rates, da/dN, for the composites incorporating TiB whiskers oriented perpendicular to the direction of crack growth were constantly lower than those obtained in the case where the orientation was parallel at the same stress intensity range ΔK, while the threshold stress intensity range, ΔKth, was higher. This effect can be explained by the increase in the degree of roughness-induced crack closure resulting from the perpendicular TiB, because fatigue cracks preferentially propagated across the boundaries between the matrix and the TiB in certain regions. In contrast, the effective threshold stress intensity range, ΔKeff,th, for composites was unaffected by the TiB orientation at low force ratios.Entities:
Keywords: crack closure; fatigue; fracture mechanics; titanium alloy; titanium boride
Year: 2019 PMID: 31717310 PMCID: PMC6888305 DOI: 10.3390/ma12223685
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Materials (Basel) ISSN: 1996-1944 Impact factor: 3.623
Chemical composition of Ti-3Al-2.5V powder (mass%).
| Al | V | Fe | C | O | N | Ti |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3.28 | 2.48 | 0.04 | 0.069 | 0.122 | 0.008 | Bal. |
Chemical composition of TiB2 powder (mass%).
| B | Fe | C | O | N | Ti |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 30.0 | 0.1 | 0.5 | 1.1 | 0.6 | Bal. |
Figure 1Specimen configuration for fatigue crack propagation tests.
Figure 2(a) Boron map obtained by electron probe micro analysis (EPMA) analysis for TiB/Ti-3Al-2.5V alloy; (b) Schematic illustration for the disk-shaped compact (DC(T)) specimens having different TiB orientations.
Figure 3Inverse pole figure maps obtained by electron backscatter diffraction (EBSD) analysis for TiB/Ti-3Al-2.5V composites indicating the crystallographic orientation to the normal plane for (a) -Ti, (b) -Ti, and (c) TiB.
Figure 4Relationship between crack growth rate and stress intensity range for TiB/Ti-3Al-2.5V composites having different TiB orientations.
Figure 5Relationship between crack growth rate and effective stress intensity range for TiB/Ti-3Al-2.5V composites having different TiB orientations.
Figure 6Relationship between Kcl/Kmax and effective stress intensity range for TiB/Ti-3Al-2.5V composites having different TiB orientations.
Figure 7Backscattered electron (BSE) images obtained by SEM observations for crack profiles for (a) LT and (b) TL series after testing at R = 0.1.
Figure 8BSE images obtained by SEM observations for fracture surfaces for (a) LT and (b) TL series after testing at R = 0.1.