Literature DB >> 3171642

Effect of electrical stimulation of the crossed olivocochlear bundle on temporary threshold shifts in auditory sensitivity. II. Dependence on the level of temporary threshold shifts.

R Rajan1.   

Abstract

1. This report presents a more detailed examination of crossed olivocochlear bundle (COCB) effects on temporary threshold shifts (TTS). The principal aim was to establish the details of the relationship between the effects of continuous COCB stimulation and the TTS caused by various exposures. Initially, in various groups, different intensities of a 1-min exposure were presented with or without COCB stimulation. Stimulation at any particular rate caused greatest reductions in TTS to occur for the higher intensity exposures than for the lower intensity ones. Thus COCB stimulation at 140 pulses/s reduced maximum threshold losses by the following amounts: 13.33 [106 dB sound pressure level (SPL) exposure], 13.29 (103 dB SPL exposure), 8.9 (101 dB SPL exposure), and 0.77 dB (97 dB SPL exposure). 2. The effect of COCB stimulation was also examined on a shorter duration (30 s) exposure causing TTS intermediate between that due to 1-min exposure at 97 dB SPL and that at 101 dB SPL. Reductions in TTS to the shorter duration exposure were not obtained with COCB stimulation at 140 pulses/s but only when the rate was increased to 260/s. 3. Thus COCB stimulation at any particular rate caused greatest reductions in TTS when the exposure would have caused a large amount of TTS, regardless of the intensity or duration of exposure. These two parameters of the exposure could be traded to provide a level of TTS that would be affected by a standard COCB stimulus. Low-level exposures that caused only small amounts of TTS were not affected by the standard COCB stimulus. As the level of the exposure, and therefore, the ensuing TTS, increased (with increased duration or intensity of exposure), the standard stimulus had greater effects. Increasing the rate of pulses in the COCB stimulus resulted in the low-level exposures now being affected. Even at the higher rate, greatest reductions in TTS were obtained when the exposure would have resulted in high levels of TTS. 4. In an attempt to determine the site of action of the continuous COCB stimulus the endocochlear potential (EP) and the summating potential (SP) were recorded from scala media of the basal turn while applying COCB stimuli similar to those used in the TTS experiments. Although the continuous COCB stimulus caused the traditional changes in the EP and SP associated with COCB stimulation with pulsed short electrical trains, these changes adapted quite rapidly and did not persist for the amount of time shown to be necessary for full reductions in TTS to be obtained.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1988        PMID: 3171642     DOI: 10.1152/jn.1988.60.2.569

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0022-3077            Impact factor:   2.714


  10 in total

1.  Old mice lacking high-affinity nicotine receptors resist acoustic trauma.

Authors:  Haiyan Shen; Zhaoyu Lin; Debin Lei; Josiah Han; Kevin K Ohlemiller; Jianxin Bao
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2011-01-25       Impact factor: 3.208

Review 2.  Protection from acoustic trauma is not a primary function of the medial olivocochlear efferent system.

Authors:  E Christopher Kirk; David W Smith
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2003-06-06

3.  Long-term effects of sectioning the olivocochlear bundle in neonatal cats.

Authors:  E J Walsh; J McGee; S L McFadden; M C Liberman
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1998-05-15       Impact factor: 6.167

4.  Functional role of GABAergic innervation of the cochlea: phenotypic analysis of mice lacking GABA(A) receptor subunits alpha 1, alpha 2, alpha 5, alpha 6, beta 2, beta 3, or delta.

Authors:  Stéphane F Maison; Thomas W Rosahl; Gregg E Homanics; M Charles Liberman
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2006-10-04       Impact factor: 6.167

5.  Diverse responses of single auditory afferent fibres to electrical stimulation of the inferior colliculus in guinea-pig.

Authors:  W H A M Mulders; D Robertson
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2004-08-12       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Gentamicin abolishes all cochlear effects of electrical stimulation of the inferior colliculus.

Authors:  W H A M Mulders; D Robertson
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2006-03-10       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  In Vitro Wedge Slice Preparation for Mimicking In Vivo Neuronal Circuit Connectivity.

Authors:  Matthew J Fischl; Catherine J C Weisz
Journal:  J Vis Exp       Date:  2020-08-18       Impact factor: 1.355

Review 8.  The olivocochlear system and protection from acoustic trauma: a mini literature review.

Authors:  Adrian Fuente
Journal:  Front Syst Neurosci       Date:  2015-06-22

9.  A point mutation in the hair cell nicotinic cholinergic receptor prolongs cochlear inhibition and enhances noise protection.

Authors:  Julian Taranda; Stéphane F Maison; Jimena A Ballestero; Eleonora Katz; Jessica Savino; Douglas E Vetter; Jim Boulter; M Charles Liberman; Paul A Fuchs; A Belén Elgoyhen
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2009-01-20       Impact factor: 8.029

10.  Chronic Conductive Hearing Loss Leads to Cochlear Degeneration.

Authors:  M Charles Liberman; Leslie D Liberman; Stéphane F Maison
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-11-18       Impact factor: 3.240

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.