Ulrike Necknig1, Ingmar Wolff2, Johannes Bründl3, Maximilian C Kriegmair4, David Marghawal5, Christian Wülfing5, Maximilian Burger3, Matthias May6. 1. Department of Urology and Pediatric Urology, Hospital Garmisch-Partenkirchen, Garmisch-Partenkirchen, Germany, necknig@yahoo.de. 2. Department of Urology, University Medicine Greifswald, Greifswald, Germany. 3. Department of Urology, University of Regensburg, Caritas St. Josef Medical Center, Regensburg, Germany. 4. Department of Urology, University Medical Center Mannheim, Mannheim, Germany. 5. Department of Urology, Asklepios Klinik Altona, Hamburg, Germany. 6. Department of Urology, St. Elisabeth Hospital Straubing, Straubing, Germany.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Senior urology physicians represent a heterogeneous group covering various clinical priorities and career objectives. No reliable data on gender-specific variations among senior urology physicians are available concerning professional and personal aspects. METHODS: The objective of this study was to analyze professional perspectives, professional and personal settings, and individual career goals. A Web-based survey containing 55 items was designed which was available for senior physicians at German urologic centers between February and April 2019. Gender-specific differences were evaluated using bootstrap-adjusted multivariate logistic regression models. RESULTS: One hundred and ninety-two surveys were evaluable including 29 female senior physicians (15.1%). Ninety-five percent would choose urology again as their field of specialization - with no significant gender-specific difference. 81.2% of participants rate the position of senior physician as a desirable career goal (comparing sexes: p = 0.220). Based on multivariate models, male participants self-assessed themselves significantly more frequently autonomously safe performing laparoscopic, open, and endourologic surgery. Male senior physicians declared 7 times more often to run for the position of head of department/full professor. CONCLUSION: This first study on professional and personal aspects among senior urology physicians demonstrates gender-specific variations concerning self-assessment of surgical expertise and future career goals. The creation of well-orchestrated human resources development strategies especially adapted to the needs of female urologists seems advisable.
INTRODUCTION: Senior urology physicians represent a heterogeneous group covering various clinical priorities and career objectives. No reliable data on gender-specific variations among senior urology physicians are available concerning professional and personal aspects. METHODS: The objective of this study was to analyze professional perspectives, professional and personal settings, and individual career goals. A Web-based survey containing 55 items was designed which was available for senior physicians at German urologic centers between February and April 2019. Gender-specific differences were evaluated using bootstrap-adjusted multivariate logistic regression models. RESULTS: One hundred and ninety-two surveys were evaluable including 29 female senior physicians (15.1%). Ninety-five percent would choose urology again as their field of specialization - with no significant gender-specific difference. 81.2% of participants rate the position of senior physician as a desirable career goal (comparing sexes: p = 0.220). Based on multivariate models, male participants self-assessed themselves significantly more frequently autonomously safe performing laparoscopic, open, and endourologic surgery. Male senior physicians declared 7 times more often to run for the position of head of department/full professor. CONCLUSION: This first study on professional and personal aspects among senior urology physicians demonstrates gender-specific variations concerning self-assessment of surgical expertise and future career goals. The creation of well-orchestrated human resources development strategies especially adapted to the needs of female urologists seems advisable.
Authors: M May; I Wolff; J Bründl; M C Kriegmair; D Marghawal; C Wülfing; M Burger; U Necknig; C Schäfer Journal: Urologe A Date: 2019-12 Impact factor: 0.639