Literature DB >> 31715325

Antimicrobial activity of cefoperazone-sulbactam tested against Gram-Negative organisms from Europe, Asia-Pacific, and Latin America.

Helio S Sader1, Cecilia G Carvalhaes2, Jennifer M Streit2, Mariana Castanheira2, Robert K Flamm2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the antimicrobial activities of cefoperazone-sulbactam and comparator agents tested against a large collection of clinical isolates of Gram-negative organisms.
METHODS: A total of 19545 Gram-negative organisms were collected from medical centers located in western Europe (W-EUR; n=10626), eastern Europe and the Mediterranean region (E-EUR; n=4029), the Asia-Pacific region (APAC; n=2491), and Latin America (LATAM; n=2399) in 2015-2016 and susceptibility tested by reference broth microdilution methods.
RESULTS: Overall, 91.5% of Enterobacterales were susceptible (≤16mg/L) to cefoperazone-sulbactam, with susceptibility rates ranging from 82.0% (E-EUR) to 94.4% (W-EUR); overall susceptibility to cefoperazone-sulbactam, piperacillin-tazobactam, imipenem, and ceftriaxone was 91.5%, 85.4%, 90.5%, and 72.1%, respectively. Among Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates, cefoperazone-sulbactam susceptibility rates were higher in W-EUR, APAC, and LATAM (83.0-84.6%) compared to E-EUR (59.5%). Susceptibility to piperacillin-tazobactam, imipenem, and ceftazidime was 78.3%, 76.2%, and 82.0% in W-EUR; 52.3%, 43.5%, and 57.4% in E-EUR; 83.5%, 80.1%, and 84.5% in APAC; and 81.5%, 72.8%, and 83.0% in LATAM, respectively. Acinetobacter spp. susceptibility rates varied from 43.0% in E-EUR to 75.8% in LATAM (53.2% overall) for cefoperazone-sulbactam and from 19.8% in E-EUR to 40.2% in W-EUR (26.4% overall) for imipenem.
CONCLUSIONS: Susceptibility rates varied widely among geographic regions and were generally lowest in E-EUR. Based on the potency and activity spectrum, cefoperazone-sulbactam remains among the most active compounds in vitro at published breakpoints.
Copyright © 2019 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Acinetobacter spp.; Antimicrobial resistance; Cefoperazone-sulbactam; ESBL; Enterobacterales

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31715325     DOI: 10.1016/j.ijid.2019.11.006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Infect Dis        ISSN: 1201-9712            Impact factor:   3.623


  7 in total

1.  Optimal Dose of Cefoperazone-Sulbactam for Acute Bacterial Infection in Patients with Chronic Kidney Disease.

Authors:  Chien-Ming Chao; Chih-Cheng Lai; Chen-Hsiang Lee; Hung-Jen Tang
Journal:  Antibiotics (Basel)       Date:  2022-04-30

2.  Chronic wound isolates and their minimum inhibitory concentrations against third generation cephalosporins at a tertiary hospital in Uganda.

Authors:  Khalim Wangoye; James Mwesigye; Martin Tungotyo; Silvano Twinomujuni Samba
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-01-24       Impact factor: 4.379

3.  Current and future perspectives in the treatment of multidrug-resistant Gram-negative infections.

Authors:  Matteo Bassetti; Javier Garau
Journal:  J Antimicrob Chemother       Date:  2021-11-22       Impact factor: 5.790

4.  Repressed Central Carbon Metabolism and Its Effect on Related Metabolic Pathways in Cefoperazone/Sulbactam-Resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa.

Authors:  Yue-Tao Chen; Ke-Xin Yang; Zhen-Yuan Dai; Huan Yi; Xuan-Xian Peng; Hui Li; Zhuang-Gui Chen
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2022-03-03       Impact factor: 5.640

5.  Model-Informed Drug Development of New Cefoperazone Sodium and Sulbactam Sodium Combination (3:1): Pharmacokinetic/Pharmacodynamic Analysis and Antibacterial Efficacy Against Enterobacteriaceae.

Authors:  Xi-Wei Ji; Xiao Zhu; Yun Li; Feng Xue; Isabelle Hui San Kuan; Qing-Feng He; Xiang-Rui Meng; Xiao-Qiang Xiang; Yi-Min Cui; Bo Zheng
Journal:  Front Pharmacol       Date:  2022-07-18       Impact factor: 5.988

6.  Effects of Tigecycline combined with Cefoperazone on bacterial clearance and serum biochemical indexes in patients with pulmonary infections in ICU.

Authors:  Nina Li; Huiyan Zhang
Journal:  Pak J Med Sci       Date:  2022 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 2.340

7.  Clinical Efficacy of Cefoperazone-Sulbactam versus Piperacillin-Tazobactam in the Treatment of Hospital-Acquired Pneumonia and Ventilator-Associated Pneumonia.

Authors:  Chia-Hung Chen; Chih-Yen Tu; Wei-Chih Chen; Li-Kuo Kuo; Yao-Tung Wang; Pin-Kuei Fu; Shih-Chi Ku; Wen-Feng Fang; Chin-Ming Chen; Chih-Cheng Lai
Journal:  Infect Drug Resist       Date:  2021-06-16       Impact factor: 4.003

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.